Gaurav Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Dada what did he say? Personally I find him very fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dada_rocks Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Wo to purani kahani hai gai baba fir kabhi.. is dhakkan ko slew of movies dealing with pakistani terrorism raas nahin aai and he went on to express that.. But dhakkan was tight-lipped when others were so vocal during kargil misadventure of parosi.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 well you said look at picture to see who he supports. Well I am saying he may be be acting in it I always thought he is a crap actor.:hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Wo to purani kahani hai gai baba fir kabhi.. is dhakkan ko slew of movies dealing with pakistani terrorism raas nahin aai and he went on to express that.. But dhakkan was tight-lipped when others were so vocal during kargil misadventure of parosi.. Didn't you get completely owned by Gambit and Aditi on a similar discussion not too long ago?:hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aditi Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Dude looks like a lady! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dada_rocks Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Didn't you get completely owned by Gambit and Aditi on a similar discussion not too long ago?:hysterical: Ur make-belief world is amazing, no comments there. U have started even dreaming about debates now..:hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Ur make-belief world is amazing' date=' no comments there. U have started even dreaming about debates now..:hysterical:[/quote'] All I know is that, Shahrukh Khan has done more for Kargil soldiers than you can ever dream of doing. That's good enough for me.:two_thumbs_up: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranvir Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 He's lost a lot of weight to get a six pack for his latest film. You can see his face has been sucked in, hence he looks like michael jackson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Was great to see SRK there. :two_thumbs_up: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kumble_rocks Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 SRK rules !:yay: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gs Posted September 25, 2007 Author Share Posted September 25, 2007 Dude looks like a lady! An ugly one at that :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandtest Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 he is a wolf in the skin of sheep....enuff said about this before....watch this space in future to know your beloved Shahrukh....:giggle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predator_05 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Times must be hard in Jollywood, so he probably took up a job as Michael Jackson's double. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guju24 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 its his own kid.. lil brat got to celebrate with indian team..damn, i am jealous :mad::P i knw man wht a lucky kid guy,.....:tounge_smile: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dada_rocks Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 All I know is that' date=' [b']Shahrukh Khan has done more for Kargil soldiers than you can ever dream of doing. That's good enough for me.:two_thumbs_up: As usual u know gilch although it;s not about me and u debate champion can;t see this little thing but ( shahrukh khan will have to leave other lucrative things to keep attempting to join defence that's about intention and would have had to fork out 25% of his savings to come close to my commitement and contribution in terms of monetary help) I am sure shahrukh mafia-tratoir khan had done anythign of that sort media wud have lapped it and wud have been all over place .. anyway continue I guess tit's dificult toexpect from likes of u to resist routing the deabte in personal territory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kumble_rocks Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 As usual u know gilch although it;s not about me and u debate champion can;t see this little thing but ( shahrukh khan will have to leave other lucrative things to keep attempting to join defence that's about intention and would have had to fork out 25% of his savings to come close to my commitement and contribution in terms of monetary help) I am sure shahrukh mafia-tratoir khan had done anythign of that sort media wud have lapped it and wud have been all over place .. anyway continue I guess tit's dificult toexpect from likes of u to resist routing the deabte in personal territory Silly post . SRK is guilty by association and AB is not ! What logic , Prof DR . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 DR, I have no intention of getting into a discussion with someone like you. I can give a scathing reply to your post but it will get personal and ugly. I just found it amusing that after you and a couple of your partners were ripped apart on a similar discussion a few days back come back babbling the same stuff. Adios. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kumble_rocks Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 DR' date= I have no intention of getting into a discussion with someone like you. I can give a scathing reply to your post but it will get personal and ugly. I just found it amusing that after you and a couple of your partners were ripped apart on a similar discussion a few days back come back babbling the same stuff. Adios. Good idea. I don't know how he gets time for these debates . He can go on and on . CC is the only poster who can take him on . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dada_rocks Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Silly post . SRK is guilty by association and AB is not ! What logic ' date=' Prof DR .[/quote'] Amar Singh: is respectable member of parliament no absconder as those mafia dons. I mentioend if having a political stand sympathetic to jihadist is crime then 70% of India is criminal. If u seriously have some evidence of Amar Singh or anyone supporting SIMI ( here the word is supporting not sympathetic otherwise Sonia Gandhi anhd Manmohan singh both become criminal) do produce that security agencies most certainly wud like to have a look because supporting SIMI or any banned organization is a punishable crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dada_rocks Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 DR, I have no intention of getting into a discussion with someone like you. I can give a scathing reply to your post but it will get personal and ugly. I just found it amusing that after you and a couple of your partners were ripped apart on a similar discussion a few days back come back babbling the same stuff. Adios. If u have not noticed yet u have already gotten personal.. Yes u have no leg to stand other than getting personal I do get that part. Good riddance I am not dying to have this logical fallacy fileld debate where in every second post I wil have to keep pointing the topic of debate either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts