Crookbond Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 http://www.dnaindia.com/india/1542579/report-nia-rubbishes-reports-that-david-headley-spoke-about-ishrat-jahan NIA's letter was produced in the court by the central government's counsel, Pankaj Champaneri. "Aversion made regarding David Colman Headley making statement on Ishrat Jahan is purely in the nature of hearsay, it does not have any evidentiary value," the letter says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FischerTal Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 ^ you have already made that point, why repeat it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crookbond Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 Not all people believe law is perfect and ultimate truth. Consider your odds, Guj HC + SIT + Metropolitan Magistrate + NIA backing up claims including multiple forensic evidence analysis etc. If law is not perfect, extraneous comments made by newspapers are far from even perfect. You need to weigh your options here. Mind you, I'm still not proclaiming that what they say is the ultimate truth but with the evidence presented it is hard to argue otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crookbond Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 ^ you have already made that point' date=' why repeat it?[/quote'] THIS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seedhi Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 http://www.dnaindia.com/india/1542579/report-nia-rubbishes-reports-that-david-headley-spoke-about-ishrat-jahanThats what I was saying - it does not specifically deny that David Headley made any statement regarding Ishrat. This is a carefully crafted statement to suppress David Headley's testimony and avoid contempt of court at a later date. I could have simply confirmed or denied, but is deliberately ambiguous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FischerTal Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 THIS ffs LET put her name on their website. why put a stranger's name on your own website? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 Any official confirmation about Modi ordered these killings? Don't hold your breath waiting for an official confirmation on someone as powerful as Modi either on the riots or this case, or any other case. If you want to believe Maya Kodnani and Rajinder Kumar were making dozens of phone calls to the Chief Ministers' office to inquire about what Modi was having for breakfast and lunch, sure go ahead. Thankfully I am not that naive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FischerTal Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 IB Chief Asif Ibrahim confirmed Rajinder Kumar's claim that Ishrat was a terrorist with LET links. Is he wrong too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FischerTal Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/ishrat-jahan-was-an-let-suicide-bomber-headley-to-nia-35665 Ishrat Jahan was an LeT suicide bomber: Headley to NIA Press Trust of India | Updated: July 05, 2010 14:23 IST Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulbul Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 Don't hold your breath waiting for an official confirmation on someone as powerful as Modi either on the riots or this case, or any other case. If you want to believe Maya Kodnani and Rajinder Kumar were making dozens of phone calls to the Chief Ministers' office to inquire about what Modi was having for breakfast and lunch, sure go ahead. Thankfully I am not that naive. There are lot of accusations against PMO , do you also believe MMS is corrupt & a criminal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crookbond Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 Thats what I was saying - it does not specifically deny that David Headley made any statement regarding Ishrat. This is a carefully crafted statement to suppress David Headley's testimony and avoid contempt of court at a later date. I could have simply confirmed or denied' date= but is deliberately ambiguous. You mean to say "David Colman Headley making statement on Ishrat Jahan is purely in the nature of hearsay" does not imply that DCH did not make any statement on IJ? :ohmy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 There are lot of accusations against PMO ' date=' do you also believe MMS is corrupt & a criminal?[/quote'] What has it got to do with the topic of this thread? Open one on Manmohan Singh and specific accusations, including exactly how the PMO is implicated, and I'll answer the question there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FischerTal Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 There are lot of accusations against PMO ' date=' do you also believe MMS is corrupt & a criminal?[/quote'] the ridiculousness of all this is, if Modi is that conniving and involved, why would he have people like Kodnani and Kumar call directly to his office from which suspicion would go to his door? logic dies a million deaths with every single post from anti-modistas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulbul Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 What has it got to do with the topic of this thread? Open one on Manmohan Singh and specific accusations' date=' including exactly how the PMO is implicated, and I'll answer the question there.[/quote'] It's about belief , if you believe one you have to believe other one also,end of day you don't have enough proof for both cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 It's about belief ' date=' if you believe one you have to believe other one also,end of day you don't have enough proof for both cases.[/quote'] Yeah and how do you know my belief. All I am saying is that it's a pointless question in the context of this thread and will derail the thread into a Congress versus BJP discussion when the point of this thread is to talk about Modi's criminal activities, and more specifically the Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulbul Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 Yeah and how do you know my belief. All I am saying is that it's a pointless question in the context of this thread and will derail the thread into a Congress versus BJP discussion when the point of this thread is to talk about Modi's criminal activities' date=' and more specifically the Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case.[/quote'] Show the proof. Why can't you believe Ishrat is a terrorist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seedhi Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 You mean to say "David Colman Headley making statement on Ishrat Jahan is purely in the nature of hearsay" does not imply that DCH did not make any statement on IJ? :ohmy:No it doesn't. It deliberately uses the word "hearsay" instead of "falsehood" in order to suppress Headley's testimony and avoid contempt of court when it is discovered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crookbond Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 ffs LET put her name on their website. why put a stranger's name on your own website? Is it? May I know the link to LeT's website? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 Show the proof. Proof of what? Why can't you believe Ishrat is a terrorist? Are you thick? Where have I said Ishrat was or was not a terrorist? Just making up things are you? Whether she was or was not a terrorist is immaterial. The main point is that she was killed in a fake encounter, one associated person is already in jail for another encounter killing and another associated person made dozens of phone calls to Modi's office the day of the encounter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FischerTal Posted June 14, 2013 Share Posted June 14, 2013 Is it? May I know the link to LeT's website? they removed it after ishrat's mother filed the case. surely you would know atleast that much about this case. :giggle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts