Guest HariSampath Posted October 11, 2007 Posted October 11, 2007 I say that Bradman, had he tored India, would have got 600 runs in a series, can you refute it ?
Guest HariSampath Posted October 11, 2007 Posted October 11, 2007 At least you must define what your criteria is for being considered a success in India, a point you have miserably failed to do on 3 threads
Anakin Posted October 11, 2007 Posted October 11, 2007 I say that Bradman' date=' had he tored India, would have got 600 runs in a series, can you refute it ?[/quote']:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: He was an amateur, a very good one. Even he knew it. Saw a dvd long time back where he himself said they were amateur cricketers in those days.
Guest HariSampath Posted October 11, 2007 Posted October 11, 2007 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: He was an amateur, a very good one. Even he knew it. Saw a dvd long time back where he himself said they were amateur cricketers in those days. After seeing the "professionals" of today on Tv, I will take that "amateur" on dvd, everytime :giggle:
Anakin Posted October 11, 2007 Posted October 11, 2007 After seeing the "professionals" of today on Tv' date=' I will take that "amateur" on dvd, everytime :giggle:[/quote']Of course you would, why else would you be a self-loathing dude
Lurker Posted October 11, 2007 Posted October 11, 2007 Sorry. Dont think your intentions are honest. kindly excuse me ... and find someone else that can indulge in a slanging match with you ... it shouldnt be hard to find such a poster. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: intentions..honest :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Looks like you had a slam dunk here Hari.
Guest HariSampath Posted October 11, 2007 Posted October 11, 2007 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: intentions..honest :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Looks like you had a slam dunk here Hari. The best part of the entire discussion on Bradman was that bheem started out trying to show Bradman was a hype, and ended up finally having a hard time in struggling establish thru convoluted logic that Bradman could not have been certainly expected to score a 300 in India in 1948 alone The very benchmark being a furious unwillingness to concede the gap between a 200 and a 300, shows what we were trying to tell him , and he realised it and scooted the debate :D
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now