Gaurav Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 That is like going to the corn-flakes counter when the biriyani counter is right next to it and both are free. :confused_smile: No it's like going to the corn flake AND biryani counter :hysterical: Have you thought that maybe I am a porn photographer by profession? hahahhah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandtest Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 No it's like going to the corn flake AND biryani counter :hysterical: :haha::giggle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongosamaj Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 No it's like going to the corn flake AND biryani counter :hysterical: Have you thought that maybe I am a porn photographer by profession? hahahhah Err..well okay. As i said, whatever floats your boat. To me its silly, thats all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaurav Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 India won yaaaaaa :yay: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajiv Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 India won yaaaaaa :yay: ..you were watching the game? I thought u must be magan with the dancers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THX_1138 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Tissue paper is still not very popular in India.....many rely on washable "rumaal" after working hard on hathgaadi :teeth_smile: did not need to know that bro... remind me to never ask you for a rumaal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fineleg Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 did not need to know that bro... remind me to never ask you for a rumaal. Aren't you glad you know...lest you visit sandtest and did not know :hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 But my point is, i can't understand why someone would LOOK at porn when they have the option to GETTING SOME REAL ACTION. What you are clearly don't seem to realize Bongosamaj is that us men are built differently to females, well most of us anyways. It is not porn that tickles our imagination but female beauty as such. I am not sure how much of a Hindi movie buff are you, but if you are then you would realize that one of the greatest line ever spoken in Hindi cinema is by Rajkumar(in Pakeezah). It went thus - Aapke Pair dekhe behad haseen hain, inhein jameen pe mat rakhiyega maile ho jaayenge. Yep a young man admires the beauty of a woman through his feet. In the movie Mere Mehboob a young poet(Rajendra Kumar) falls for the beauty of a burqa clad female(Sadhna) even though all he can see is her eyes. Point being men are built in a way that we appreciate female beauty. In this sense we are obviously different to females, I mean in which movie did a girl appreciate a guy's feet?? If anything it is often used as a joke. Taking a movie example again, in Andaaz Apna Apna, Aamir Khan fantasises about Juhi Chawla telling him, "Agar in majboot kandhon ka sahara mujhe mil jaata"... I can personally attest to this since every morning I tend to watch beautiful females bodies in gym. And personally I feel no two females bodies are same, they are different all the time and are always beautiful. One assumption/judgement that people sometimes make is that tharkis are "easy". Actually it is other way around. Tharkis are romantics but they are not cheap. I can see what GKD means that he hasnt cheated on his wife, not because he is a fellow member of tharki clan, but putting it simply there is no way he is gonna get swayed unless there is something huge at offer. I mean what is he gonna get that he hasnt seen before?? I suppose in this way tharkis are much better than non-tharkis who tend to slip ever so often. Just look at all the right-wing family value people that fall everyday in USA. xxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongosamaj Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 What you are clearly don't seem to realize Bongosamaj is that us men are built differently to females, well most of us anyways. It is not porn that tickles our imagination but female beauty as such. I am not sure how much of a Hindi movie buff are you, but if you are then you would realize that one of the greatest line ever spoken in Hindi cinema is by Rajkumar(in Pakeezah). It went thus - Aapke Pair dekhe behad haseen hain, inhein jameen pe mat rakhiyega maile ho jaayenge. Yep a young man admires the beauty of a woman through his feet. In the movie Mere Mehboob a young poet(Rajendra Kumar) falls for the beauty of a burqa clad female(Sadhna) even though all he can see is her eyes. Point being men are built in a way that we appreciate female beauty. In this sense we are obviously different to females, I mean in which movie did a girl appreciate a guy's feet?? If anything it is often used as a joke. Taking a movie example again, in Andaaz Apna Apna, Aamir Khan fantasises about Juhi Chawla telling him, "Agar in majboot kandhon ka sahara mujhe mil jaata"... I can personally attest to this since every morning I tend to watch beautiful females bodies in gym. And personally I feel no two females bodies are same, they are different all the time and are always beautiful. One assumption/judgement that people sometimes make is that tharkis are "easy". Actually it is other way around. Tharkis are romantics but they are not cheap. I can see what GKD means that he hasnt cheated on his wife, not because he is a fellow member of tharki clan, but putting it simply there is no way he is gonna get swayed unless there is something huge at offer. I mean what is he gonna get that he hasnt seen before?? I suppose in this way tharkis are much better than non-tharkis who tend to slip ever so often. Just look at all the right-wing family value people that fall everyday in USA. xxx Yaar, you are not understanding. And I don't consider Indian culture's views on sexuality (that has happened over the last 1000 years) to be very sane or consistent either. But anyways, my point is very simple- just like once you taste biriyani, you don't eat McDonald's hamburgers if you have the exact same free choice(availability & price), it just seems very silly/repressed/stunted for me to indulge in pornography when there is the available option of getting laid by someone real and in person directly interacting with you. I am sorry but the 'hand' is only a very very poor substitute for the vagina and if you argue otherwise, i don't want to discuss this any further. You will find the same perspective consistent in most western culture folks as well - those who get laid often ( either by same person/many people) don't do porn and those who can't get laid are the ones heavy in porn as far as majority behaviour goes. Plus i don't think most of the 'porn proponents' here realize that the way sex and nudity is potrayed in pornography is mostly very crass and completely alien to that of a real life encouter resulting from a 'sexual spark between two people'. And the bulk majority of pornography is highly degrading in its nature. So not only is it like watching a black-and-white tv when you got the option of a color widescreen LCD, it is also far less 'real' in its nature. I can garantee you, if you approached sex like 90% of pornography does, you will create serious issues in your relationship or flat out get tossed from bed by the other partner. But hey, if it floats your boat, go for it. As far as i am concerned, i don't do porn when i got the option of getting some. Otherwise, it is just stupidity and uncreativity, thats all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaurav Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Bongo yaar why are you so stubborn? :D I for one look at SOFT porn and no not always for wacking off(not like I used to as a teenager). Lurker summed it up very nicely I must say. Plus i don't think most of the 'porn proponents' here realize that the way sex and nudity is potrayed in pornography is mostly very crass and completely alien to that of a real life encouter resulting from a 'sexual spark between two people'.Are yaar why do you assume the worst? Have you looked at arty porn? Just pure feminine body in VERY artistic poses. Everything is black and white for you? No grey? it just seems very silly/repressed/stunted for me to indulge in pornography when there is the available option of getting laid by someone real and in person directly interacting with you.What if your partner is unavailable? Say she is away and you have the urge to surge... :hysterical: I am sorry but the 'hand' is only a very very poor substitute for the vagina and if you argue otherwise, i don't want to discuss this any further.Are yaar again you make up your own points and then argue against them. No one here said that wacking off it better than the real deal. You will find the same perspective consistent in most western culture folks as well - those who get laid often ( either by same person/many people) don't do porn and those who can't get laid are the ones heavy in porn as far as majority behaviour goes.Blanket statement. No one here said that they are HEAVILY into porn. Atleast I am not. And the bulk majority of pornography is highly degrading in its nature. So not only is it like watching a black-and-white tv when you got the option of a color widescreen LCD, it is also far less 'real' in its nature.It's no more fake than the discussion we are having. :D I can garantee you, if you approached sex like 90% of pornography does, you will create serious issues in your relationship or flat out get tossed from bed by the other partner.Looks like you into nasty stuff so you are assuming that we all are as well :hysterical: But hey, if it floats your boat, go for it. As far as i am concerned, i don't do porn when i got the option of getting some. Otherwise, it is just stupidity and uncreativity, thats all. Liar :finger: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongosamaj Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 What if your partner is unavailable? Say she is away and you have the urge to surge.. That rarely happens for more than a week or two at best in my case ( unavailability of partner) and in that time, i just wait for her to come back and unleash my two weeks worth of frustrations in the bedroom. Perhaps you've not been involved with several people or perhaps you simply need to blow your wad everyday, but as far as i am concerned, porn is but a poor substitute for the real thing and once you get a taste of the real thing, porn loses its potency. And i still maintain that its juvenile to look at porn when you have experienced the real deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts