thecricketer Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 Any one noticed it yesterday ? Ajmal was bowling in Mallinga's sling action. Funny part is that both of them already have suspect action. Why ICC is allowing this ?
rixxuu Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 To be fair that action was looking more legit, his arm was straighter then regular while bowling that ball.
Pagalpanti Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 Wonder why no one is reporting his action. So many experts question it time and again.. Weren't Murali and Bhajji reported twice? Just because he's cleared doesn't mean he hasn't gone back to chucking.
CSK Fan Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 Malinga has a suspect action? Malinga has one of the cleanest actions under ICC laws and has never been reported or called suspicious
Pioneer Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 Wonder why no one is reporting his action. So many experts question it time and again.. Weren't Murali and Bhajji reported twice? Just because he's cleared doesn't mean he hasn't gone back to chucking. Haha which experts? ICF experts ?
jusarrived Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 Haha which experts? ICF experts ? are you suggesting that Ajmals action is clean ? :cantstop:
Pioneer Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 are you suggesting that Ajmals action is clean ? :cantstop: Define what you mean by clean? If by clean you mean legal then yes its definitely clean. If by clean you mean a dead straight arm then no its not. I just find it funny how people, mostly Indians, harp on about Ajmal's action for days when the rest of the world has gotten over it as he's been put under the scanner before. Crying online won't help
Midfielder Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Define what you mean by clean? If by clean you mean legal then yes its definitely clean. If by clean you mean a dead straight arm then no its not. I just find it funny how people, mostly Indians, harp on about Ajmal's action for days when the rest of the world has gotten over it as he's been put under the scanner before. Crying online won't help I dont understand how pakistanis start quoting laws of physics to defend a chucker. That man is illegal bowler and should be called. Malinga is fine.
Midfielder Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 He has been and this is what they found. http://www.espncricinfo.com/pakistan-v-england-2012/content/story/552586.html Now for the science bit: as Ajmal begins to bring his arm over to bowl, there is, on average, a 23.5 degree bend in his elbow (elbow flexion) - the angle to which Ajmal referred in his BBC interview. As he delivers the ball, his arm straightens (elbow extension) by, on average, eight degrees - well within the 15-degree range of tolerance for international cricket set by the ICC. First - I dont give a damn about this university of Western Australia. I am not sure how good they are. It seems like someone paid them off for this bullsheet. Even by their admission he flexes it by 25 degrees and straightens it later on. So according to my calculations he can get much more rpm by 25 degree bend than someone like Ashwin who is barely 3 degrees. 25/3 = 8 times the advantage. If he has arm problem he can play paraolympics but should not be allowed to set foot on cricket field.
Guest Sabi Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Now for the science bit: as Ajmal begins to bring his arm over to bowl' date= there is, on average, a 23.5 degree bend in his elbow (elbow flexion) - the angle to which Ajmal referred in his BBC interview. As he delivers the ball, his arm straightens (elbow extension) by, on average, eight degrees - well within the 15-degree range of tolerance for international cricket set by the ICC. First - I dont give a damn about this university of Western Australia. I am not sure how good they are. It seems like someone paid them off for this bullsheet. Even by their admission he flexes it by 25 degrees and straightens it later on. So according to my calculations he can get much more rpm by 25 degree bend than someone like Ashwin who is barely 3 degrees. 25/3 = 8 times the advantage. If he has arm problem he can play paraolympics but should not be allowed to set foot on cricket field. Nonsense. Who are you to say that.? Cry a river, he is a top bowler and you guys are just jealous.
Midfielder Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Nonsense. Who are you to say that.? Cry a river' date=' he is a top bowler and you guys are just jealous.[/quote'] He is a cheater and we will call him a cheater all day long. If there was an Indian bowler pulling this crap you will be crying like a newborn baby.
Sajid_Rana Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 He is a cheater and we will call him a cheater all day long. If there was an Indian bowler pulling this crap you will be crying like a newborn baby. A cheat is someone like Dravid or Asif who is convicted of a crime. No body cares about the internet trolls who are jealous of a successful spinner who doesn't play on home pitches and still average in 20s. Some spinners mostly play at home and still average in 40s.
Midfielder Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 A cheat is someone like Dravid or Asif who is convicted of a crime. No body cares about the internet trolls who are jealous of a successful spinner who doesn't play on home pitches and still average in 20s. Some spinners mostly play at home and still average in 40s. Not at all jealous just upset that he can cheat in broad day light. Never copmlained about Saqlain or Wasim or Waqar's action but Murli and Ajmal give me a break.
undisputed chap Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Malinga action or not i still think warne>>ajmal
Midfielder Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Malinga action or not i still think warne>>ajmal agreed
moniker Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Now for the science bit: as Ajmal begins to bring his arm over to bowl' date= there is, on average, a 23.5 degree bend in his elbow (elbow flexion) - the angle to which Ajmal referred in his BBC interview. As he delivers the ball, his arm straightens (elbow extension) by, on average, eight degrees - well within the 15-degree range of tolerance for international cricket set by the ICC. First - I dont give a damn about this university of Western Australia. I am not sure how good they are. It seems like someone paid them off for this bullsheet. Even by their admission he flexes it by 25 degrees and straightens it later on. So according to my calculations he can get much more rpm by 25 degree bend than someone like Ashwin who is barely 3 degrees. 25/3 = 8 times the advantage. If he has arm problem he can play paraolympics but should not be allowed to set foot on cricket field. Ajmal may bend his arm to 23 degrees but he doesn't straighten it completely. It is still bent at the point of delivery, his arm not straightening through the whole 23 degrees but rather 8 degrees. But yeah 8 degrees vs 3 degrees, Ajmal is going to impart more revs on the ball than Ashwin. The ICC has come up with this arbitrary value of 15 degrees, gotta just take it and move on.
Crookbond Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 A cheat is someone like Dravid or Asif who is convicted of a crime. No body cares about the internet trolls who are jealous of a successful spinner who doesn't play on home pitches and still average in 20s. Some spinners mostly play at home and still average in 40s. Dravid is convicted of a crime?
FischerTal Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 A cheat is someone like Dravid or Asif who is convicted of a crime. No body cares about the internet trolls who are jealous of a successful spinner who doesn't play on home pitches and still average in 20s. Some spinners mostly play at home and still average in 40s. Dravid convicted of crime? What are you smoking?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now