Crookbond Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Since late 70s they have deep hatred. There attacks are more violent and hate is more. I dont know what your sourcesare but Pakistan is root cause of all the bad terror stuff going on in the world. They should be taken seriously. No denying that part. However, that doesn't mean the average Pakistani on the street is filled with "hate".
gs Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 No denying that part. However' date=' that doesn't mean the average Pakistani on the street is filled with "hate".[/quote'] But that appears to be enough to wreak havoc in the world.
gs Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 That appears to be enough to wreak havoc in the world.
panther Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 the points you are deliberately ignoring 1) Your own government agreed to the Indian version 2) ISI and your army has also not denied this version 3) the fishing boar belonged to India. the Indian navy did indeed intercept the boat and the captain, who was a hostage, spoke to the navy and showed all the papers. The captain was later killed. do you know how many thousands of such fishing boats ply everyday in those waters? Do you think each and every boat is completely searched? 4) David Headley in the US exposed how Hafeez Saeed and ISI had trained Kasab and others in different accents and languages deliberately. Obviously they thought it was enough to fool some really stupid people who cannot see beyond their nose. What do you think happens in the months/years of training such high profile terrorists? Of course they are trained to be different to later deny that they were one of yours As they say, those who conduct such terrorist acts always look for the sympathies of fools and conspiracy minded individuals who are willing to close their eyes and swallow these lies i have replied to each hole you tried to poke in the official theory. Now answer these point about the hole in your theory if you are honest 1) How can a democracy like India carry such an operation? The party in power is a rag-tag bunch of politicians. they neither command the power, nor the source to carry such a conspiracy. 2) the Indian army has no where near power as the Pakistan army to either conduct such a mission or have the will to do so 3) India has never openly supported Israel, Why would it kill it's own citizens for anything Israel says 4) What benefit, if any will India get from this. What benefits will the politicians get from this when they are not even assured of another term because of the way our country is ruled You are quick to poke theories in the official version, lets see if you have the guts to defend your theory which is something a 5 year old will come up with 1) Indian government did not carry it out, it was done by Fascist, with the help of isreal and usa.Congress government had no option but to blame Pakistan they were promised one more term in order to keep quite, but now it's bye bye congress and secular India, and welcome to Hindu India. 2) Indian army had no role in it, Raw did. 3) Hinduivita and Zionism are two branches from the same tree, They formed an alliance back in the late 80s/ early 90s, Israel most strategic ally today after suadia Arabia is India. 4) There is no benefit for The Indian people or congress government apart from one more term to loot the Country, National interest and the people are of no concern for Hinduvita and Zionism which both have a pig headed obsession with their specific goals, they do not care what the cost they have to pay, the lives lost they are obsessed in Zionism case with the return of the messiah and in Hinduviitas case akand bharat.
panther Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Kashmiris r less opressed than every single paki thats not related to the army or isi or is a mega millionaire Sent from my GT-S5830D using Tapatalk 2 what bs, if kashmris are not oppressed than what are Half a million Indian soldiers doing in a great and free land.
Midfielder Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 what bs' date=' if kashmris are not oppressed than what are Half a million Indian soldiers doing in a great and free land.[/quote'] Because the muslims in Indian part of kashmir want to separate. But what other poster was alluding to the fact even these muslims have more right in India then the crap you serve across the border. That is part of India and India can have one, ten or million soldiers whatever they decide.
Midfielder Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 1) Indian government did not carry it out, it was done by Fascist, with the help of isreal and usa.Congress government had no option but to blame Pakistan they were promised one more term in order to keep quite, but now it's bye bye congress and secular India, and welcome to Hindu India. 2) Indian army had no role in it, Raw did. 3) Hinduivita and Zionism are two branches from the same tree, They formed an alliance back in the late 80s/ early 90s, Israel most strategic ally today after suadia Arabia is India. 4) There is no benefit for The Indian people or congress government apart from one more term to loot the Country, National interest and the people are of no concern for Hinduvita and Zionism which both have a pig headed obsession with their specific goals, they do not care what the cost they have to pay, the lives lost they are obsessed in Zionism case with the return of the messiah and in Hinduviitas case akand bharat. So you want to play cricket with people like these who thinks RAW was responsible for what happened in India.
gs Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 So you want to play cricket with people like these who thinks RAW was responsible for what happened in India. Probably their half a dozen WC losses to India can also be attributed RAW/Israel/US/Mars etc.
panther Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 So you want to play cricket with people like these who thinks RAW was responsible for what happened in India. In Islam even at times of war trade is allowed with the enemy.
veer Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 In Islam even at times of war trade is allowed with the enemy. No wonder you are in mess with that kind of ideology.. Indirectly killing soldiers of a country while asking for money directly. Begeiraati ki hadd hoti he..
Crookbond Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 No wonder you are in mess with that kind of ideology.. He's trolling!!!
Midfielder Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 In Islam even at times of war trade is allowed with the enemy. In Islam is it OK to blow up innocent people?
panther Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 In Islam is it OK to blow up innocent people? nope
panther Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 No wonder you are in mess with that kind of ideology.. Indirectly killing soldiers of a country while asking for money directly. Begeiraati ki hadd hoti he.. Actually it is more of my mistake in the sense I meant That sanctions, basically withholding of goods is not allowed on a country you are in war with because within that country are women and children, who are not considered as combatants. So we can not block off trade routes, or break our own trade agreements that were signed before any war unless there is a clause in them.
Midfielder Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 nope Then why do you kill Indians in Mumbai? Another question, Is it OK to lie in Islam?
Midfielder Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Actually it is more of my mistake in the sense I meant That sanctions, basically withholding of goods is not allowed on a country you are in war with because within that country are women and children, who are not considered as combatants. So we can not block off trade routes, or break our own trade agreements that were signed before any war unless there is a clause in them. Clause means way out? In Islam is it OK to desecrate others places of religion and worship?
veer Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Clause means way out? In Islam is it OK to desecrate others places of religion and worship? Abbe thakkan.. even us hindus do that too. its not religion.. its people. You are talking like we are perfect role models. We got our own long list of faults. So just chill.. Gyaan mat de..
panther Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Then why do you kill Indians in Mumbai? Another question, Is it OK to lie in Islam? I won't answer the first question because I haven't killed anyone in mumbai. No it is not ok to lie in Islam, if you have any serious objective behind your question than you can search the Quran for proof.
panther Posted April 18, 2014 Posted April 18, 2014 Clause means way out? In Islam is it OK to desecrate others places of religion and worship? in a way an agreement may be disbanded if certain conditions are not met, or due to certain circumstances. Nope A Muslim is not allowed to desecrate other peoples places of religion and worship.
Recommended Posts