THX_1138 Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 tu tau gaya kaam sey .... :D :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: heres SRTs record just for chuckles ... Mat I NO Runs HS1 HS2 HS3 Ave 100 50 0 unfiltered 140 226 23 11150 248* 241* 217 54.92 37 45 13 Peak 93 149 15 7869 217 201* 179 58.72 29 31 8 After 47 77 8 3281 248* 241* 194* 47.55 8 14 5 actually there was a point in tendulkar's career he averaged about 60.00 - 61.00. this was either just before the south african tour of 1996 (or whenever it is that this happened, this was the tour where he scored a magnificient 169). Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Online Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Bump the after Peak avg of SRT stands right now at 48 :winky: that's only because he is a selfish player who plays for his average only Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
ananthd Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 It's a travesty that the WSC Super Tests aren't included in the test careers of many of the greats of the 70s & 80s..... Richards played in 14 Super Tests(11 for WI & 3 for RoW) and averaged 56 in them..... Unquestionably the best bowling attacks in the period 77-79 were to be found in the WSC..... Given the breakdown here it should really be: Viv Richards: Ist half: 58 Tests at 60.34 II half: 77 Tests at 43.12 Materially it only makes a slight difference to his career average(bumps it up to 50.88 from 50.34), but the idea that Richards was 'sorted out in 40 Tests' is incorrect. I've seen Richards(in the mid 80s), Lara & Tendulkar at their pomp.... I'd still pick Richards over the other 2, for the sheer intimidation he bought to the crease.... Link to comment
ananthd Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Basically, Richards hung around too long.... Scored only 1 of his 24 Test hundreds in the last 3 years of his career(88-91)..... Link to comment
Anakin Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 If you have the best team in the world with possibly the most lethal bowling attack in history, and you're very talented, there is no reason why you shouldn't bat with gay abandon. Link to comment
sandtest Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Great thread, all praise to Bossbhai as usual. So Rahul Dravid isn't alone, we have names like Viv Richards to accompany him:giggle: Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Great thread, all praise to Bossbhai as usual. So Rahul Dravid isn't alone, we have names like Viv Richards to accompany him:giggle: RSD has done enough for India so he is infact excused for his failures in the past 2 years whereas SRT is yet to win games for India so he has to score 50's in 1st innings and BIG 100's in 2nd innings every time he walks to the pitch :winky: Link to comment
coffee_rules Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Richards and Sehwag are similar. Their attacking shots are based on superb hand to eye coordination. That is why they can take on any bowler any ball any time. As they age, their prime skills die out and they start scrathcing around. Link to comment
Sooda Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 ^ Precisely, I do think Sehwag should play at 4 or 5 in the batting order for this reason, as he gets older the new/moving ball might pose more of a problem- we seem to have a few decent opening options to partner GG In any case once SRT retires and with Ganguly gone we need quick middle order run scorers- one in Yuvraj isnt enough Link to comment
Rajan Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 i think Lara was one player who lifted his average from 48 ish to 52 ish with the strength of his performances in the second half of his career.he was directionless after the great fast bowlers retired and was finding it difficult to realise that his team was losing almost every second test free falling in to an abyss.but some how he got a grip and returned with a vengeance.but he was also accused as a selfish player by his own team mate Ridley Jacobs. i remember Lara scoring some thing like 2, 12,192,2 in a series and get an average of 50, where as some one like sachin was more consistent for a longer part of his career. even in the series in which Lara scored 400*, he was a huge failure in the other 6 innings but the 400* lifted the average for the series when compared to the other consistent batsmen who did not get support from Lara. if Viv Richards played with gay abandon because he was part of a great team, Lara played with gay abandon because he was part of a weak team. Link to comment
Anakin Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 I agree, and that takes more balls. Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
graphic23 Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 someone is avoiding this thread like the plague :--D Haha. Yeah. ;) You should make up more stats trivia. I'd be interested in trying to answer them. :two_thumbs_up: Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Shehezaada Posted January 19, 2009 Share Posted January 19, 2009 from what i've read Viv continued to play his shots even after his eyesight and reflexes weren't what they used to be. That's why his averaged dropped. Amazing that inspite of 20 years Tendulkar is still able to invent and implement shots based on a situation (THAT uppercut over Lee on a quick Perth pitch). Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now