vvvslaxman Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 http://www.foxsports.com.au/cricket/australia/australia-v-india-2015-player-ratings-ian-chappell-rates-every-aussie-cricketers-series/story-fn2mcu3x-1227180898543 They have impressive pool of pace bowling . Hazlewood is definitely an exciting addition. He is very similar to Pigeon.
MCGGG Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 http://www.foxsports.com.au/cricket/australia/australia-v-india-2015-player-ratings-ian-chappell-rates-every-aussie-cricketers-series/story-fn2mcu3x-1227180898543 They have impressive pool of pace bowling . Hazlewood is definitely an exciting addition. He is very similar to Pigeon. He's just keeping Pattinsons seat warm mate., Pattinson is as nasty as they come.
vvvslaxman Posted January 10, 2015 Author Posted January 10, 2015 He's just keeping Pattinsons seat warm mate.' date=' Pattinson is as nasty as they come.[/quote'] That is what i meant. Pattinson, Siddle they have array of fast bowlers to choose from. Whether they are world class or not but they are proper test match bowlers.
MCGGG Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 That is what i meant. Pattinson' date=' Siddle they have array of fast bowlers to choose from. Whether they are world class or not but they are proper test match bowlers.[/quote'] I think Pattinsons one out of the box, if he gets his body right he could be anything.
brendan07 Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 I think Pattinsons one out of the box' date=' if he gets his body right he could be anything.[/quote'] Cummins is even better, and I have worked in both squads and that view is shared by everyone. Pattinson will be your ideal 2nd quick, Cummins has the potential to be absolutely elite. I like Joel Paris (WA) as the swinging left armer. Hazelwood, Starc, Sean Abbott, Behrendoff as the reserves. Hazelwood first in line. Would replace Paris in England though, will destroy England in the UK.
MCGGG Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 Cummins is even better' date=' and I have worked in both squads and that view is shared by everyone. Pattinson will be your ideal 2nd quick, Cummins has the potential to be absolutely elite. I like Joel Paris (WA) as the swinging left armer. Hazelwood, Starc, Sean Abbott, Behrendoff as the reserves. Hazelwood first in line. Would replace Paris in England though, will destroy England in the UK.[/quote'] Have to agree to disagree on that then, time will tell.
brendan07 Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 Have to agree to disagree on that then' date=' time will tell.[/quote'] Cummins has way more tricks and he is upwards of 5-10kmph at his best quicker. Cummins can swing it but on flat pitches can bowl cutters and his slower ball is outstanding. I'll take the word of 20+ coaches I have had some work with through my work at Cricket NSW, SACA, and Cricket Victoria. NONE have said they would take Pattinson first. They see him as a 2nd quick supporting Cummins.
MCGGG Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 Cummins has way more tricks and he is upwards of 5-10kmph at his best quicker. Cummins can swing it but on flat pitches can bowl cutters and his slower ball is outstanding. I'll take the word of 20+ coaches I have had some work with through my work at Cricket NSW' date=' SACA, and Cricket Victoria. NONE have said they would take Pattinson first. They see him as a 2nd quick supporting Cummins.[/quote'] Not doubting your word, but I've learnt to trust my own eye, and mate Cummins isn't anywhere near 10ks quicker than Patto, if anything I'd say Patto is quicker, atleast for a combined spell, FTR Patto clocked 150 tonight coming off injury with a new action.
brendan07 Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 Not doubting your word' date=' but I've learnt to trust my own eye, and mate Cummins isn't anywhere near 10ks quicker than Patto, if anything I'd say Patto is quicker, atleast for a combined spell, FTR Patto clocked 150 tonight coming off injury with a new action.[/quote'] In a Big Bash game coming down wind- Cummins clocked 154 the night before. That said both are at their very best when around 146-147kmph and accurate. Pattinson is very good but on flat tracks he has struggled a bit and it comes from not having cutters or a decent slower ball. Both will compliment one another but Cummins will spearhead the attack.
MCGGG Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 In a Big Bash game coming down wind- Cummins clocked 154 the night before. That said both are at their very best when around 146-147kmph and accurate. Pattinson is very good but on flat tracks he has struggled a bit and it comes from not having cutters or a decent slower ball. Both will compliment one another but Cummins will spearhead the attack. I like what you're saying, And I like Cummins, but ive been on the Patty wagon since day 1 lol, Patto himself couldn't convince me Cummins is better lol. I like to think Australia have delayed announcing their WC squad because they wanted to see how Pattinson came back from injury, if that's true they know now, I'd pick him.
MCGGG Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 Not sure if you saw Patto in the BB tonight Brendon but his opening spell was borderline scary, and he weren't bowling to hacks.
brendan07 Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 Not sure if you saw Patto in the BB tonight Brendon but his opening spell was borderline scary' date=' and he weren't bowling to hacks.[/quote'] White is in terrible form. It was okay but I'll take Cummins there are just more tricks to his bowling and you need that on flat tracks.
brendan07 Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 I like what you're saying, And I like Cummins, but ive been on the Patty wagon since day 1 lol, Patto himself couldn't convince me Cummins is better lol. I like to think Australia have delayed announcing their WC squad because they wanted to see how Pattinson came back from injury, if that's true they know now, I'd pick him. WC side was named last weekend internally just delayed due to the test match. Pattinson is no hope. Hasn't played a match where he has bowled more than 4 overs.
MCGGG Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 WC side was named last weekend internally just delayed due to the test match. Pattinson is no hope. Hasn't played a match where he has bowled more than 4 overs. Why the delay? Harris? As in his knee? Clarke? Must be a reason.
MCGGG Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 White is in terrible form. It was okay but I'll take Cummins there are just more tricks to his bowling and you need that on flat tracks. He got that English guy (name escapes me), and had him in all sorts prior as well, not sure about White, but he's no hack that's for sure, easily on the second cusp of Australia's Limited overs 11.
brendan07 Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 Why the delay? Harris? As in his knee? Clarke? Must be a reason. It is named tomorrow and mainly it was delayed so that the players in the test who were very emotional could get through the match. Plus they need a guide whether Clarke is half a Chance. Pattinson isn't a realistic chance hasn't had the bowling yet, he will break down.
MCGGG Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 And Brendon, they won't be flat tracks mate, drop ins or not the majority of the WC will be played in March, pitches will be very unpredictable IMO.
brendan07 Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 He got that English guy (name escapes me)' date=' and had him in all sorts prior as well, not sure about White, but he's no hack that's for sure, easily on the second cusp of Australia's Limited overs 11.[/quote'] Luke Wright, has an abysmal technique- good reason he has barely played a game for England. Pieterson dealt with him pretty comfortably. He isn't ready for the WC yet.
brendan07 Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 And Brendon' date=' they won't be flat tracks mate, drop ins or not the majority of the WC will be played in March, pitches will be very unpredictable IMO.[/quote'] Odi's are always fairly placid. Perth and Brisbane should offer something, the rest 300 will be absolute par
MCGGG Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 It is named tomorrow and mainly it was delayed so that the players in the test who were very emotional could get through the match. Plus they need a guide whether Clarke is half a Chance. Pattinson isn't a realistic chance hasn't had the bowling yet' date=' he will break down.[/quote'] Yeah Andrew Ramsay predicts Johnson-Stark-Harris and Cummins.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now