Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

They set some rules for certain stories and couldnt apply the same rules to other stories, that was my point. Now had they not gone public about what made them do a story or not do a story then it would have been fine. Once you set a policy, you must stick to it.

Posted
It means that more crimes are being reported and more convictions. In India only a fraction of cases are reported.
How do you know that there is no under reporting of rapes in Philipines?
Posted

On NDTV they are saying that Mr Singh (the rapist) might escape the death penalty as his appeals process has been compromised. Dont know how true this is, but he this guy manages to get off the noose, then the documentary maker really needs to hang her head in shame. How can you not weight the legal consequences? At the very least wait for the legal process to finish.

Posted

I watched the documentary. There is nothing in it that "damages India's image" which has not been damaged so far. Stupid decision to ban it. If anything it damages India's image even more.

Posted
I watched the documentary. There is nothing in it that "damages India's image" which has not been damaged so far. Stupid decision to ban it. If anything it damages India's image even more.
and what about the legal reasons i just mentioned?
Posted
and what about the legal reasons i just mentioned?
What legal reasons? The govt is just acting stupid. BBC did not broadcast it in India. Indian laws don't apply in the U.K. The government is really making a fool of itself. They should not have banned it in the first place. Can you explain to me why it was banned?
Posted
That is my biggest problem.By naming her and then showing her photograph and then revealing in details what they did with her is againist Indian law and British law as well. UK revels in denigrating its old colonies and live in a superiority complex.This is a result of that.
If her parents are OK with revealing her name then where is the problem?
Posted
What legal reasons? The govt is just acting stupid. BBC did not broadcast it in India. Indian laws don't apply in the U.K. The government is really making a fool of itself. They should not have banned it in the first place. Can you explain to me why it was banned?
read the posts i made and the legal reasons have been explained.
Posted
If her parents are OK with revealing her name then where is the problem?
the law is the law.. you cannot selectively pick and choose. As i have mentioned before the rapist can use the technicality of trial by media to avoid the hangman's noose.
Posted
On NDTV they are saying that Mr Singh (the rapist) might escape the death penalty as his appeals process has been compromised. Dont know how true this is, but he this guy manages to get off the noose, then the documentary maker really needs to hang her head in shame. How can you not weigh the legal consequences? At the very least wait for the legal process to finish.
....
Posted
On NDTV they are saying that Mr Singh (the rapist) might escape the death penalty as his appeals process has been compromised. Dont know how true this is, but he this guy manages to get off the noose, then the documentary maker really needs to hang her head in shame. How can you not weight the legal consequences? At the very least wait for the legal process to finish.
Do you really think that the SC would base its judgement on a documentary? How has his appeal process been compromised by this documentary?
Posted
Do you really think that the SC would base its judgement on a documentary? How has his appeal process been compromised by this documentary?
but why not wait? Is there something stopping you from waiting?
Posted
The father in his own voice has said in the documentary that he wants the world to know the name of his daughter. He is changing his tune now' date= perhaps under political pressure.
Who are you to judge this man?
×
×
  • Create New...