sage Posted March 28, 2015 Author Posted March 28, 2015 I mean, in terms of population added to the game. There're probably better countries to target financially, I get the history of it all, and stuff. But is it really vital for the well-being of the game?
MCGGG Posted March 28, 2015 Posted March 28, 2015 The West Indies are done mate, basketball and soccer has taken over. :( The money just isn't there for cricketers, then you have the tension between islands and such.
Marut Posted March 28, 2015 Posted March 28, 2015 Not really. Strong India would actually help cricket in a bigger way because of India occupying a niche spot in cricket.
MCGGG Posted March 28, 2015 Posted March 28, 2015 Not really. Strong India would actually help cricket in a bigger way because of India occupying a niche spot in cricket. Disagree, cricket is already super strong in India, you just have to learn how to play the game.
kubrickian Posted March 28, 2015 Posted March 28, 2015 Strange thing about West Indies is they always seem to have a good team on paper - good batsmen, good fast bowlers, decent all rounders and usually a decent spinner but they never seem to perform as a team and stitch together a few decent performances to be able to win a game. I think its due to a lack of motivation, work ethic, professionalism than due to lack of talent or ability. For starters, they need to get rid of Gayle because some players are like poison because of their attitude and they rub off negatively on other team members.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now