Guest Hiten. Posted December 9, 2007 Posted December 9, 2007 Priceless! not the thread..akhtar's value to india :hysterical:
Mr. Wicket Posted December 9, 2007 Author Posted December 9, 2007 From Cricinfo's Quote/Unquote: "I don't know - for us or for Pakistan?" Graeme Smith wittily replies when asked if the absence of Shoaib Akhtar would be an advantage during South Africa's tour of Pakistan
siddhu Posted December 9, 2007 Posted December 9, 2007 He came' date=' he chucked, got farked[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical:
Rajiv Posted December 9, 2007 Posted December 9, 2007 He came' date=' he chucked, got farked[/quote'] Will he ever be picked again, if PCB doesn't realize the drama then they are the biggest losers
siddhu Posted December 9, 2007 Posted December 9, 2007 Will he ever be picked again' date=' if PCB doesn't realize the drama then they are the biggest losers[/quote'] They already are the biggest losers. They realize the drama (for sometime), ban him for few matches and pick him again (again proving themselves losers).
chanakya Posted December 9, 2007 Posted December 9, 2007 He is a true matchwinner, Pakistan haven't won a match with him since his comeback,
King Posted December 9, 2007 Posted December 9, 2007 He is a true matchwinner' date=' Pakistan haven't won a match with him since his comeback,[/quote'] Match winner or match sinner? :D
Mr. Wicket Posted December 9, 2007 Author Posted December 9, 2007 They already are the biggest losers. They realize the drama (for sometime)' date=' ban him for few matches and pick him again (again proving themselves losers).[/quote'] Yup. The PCB disgraced their team and themselves by bending rules and regulations to bring Akhtar back prematurely after that drug ban looked to have potentially called time on his career (he'd have been 33 by the time it ended, not an age favouring a comeback). Then after his incident with Asif, they gave him a carefully timed ban designed to let him still take part in the India tests. No concern for team dynamics, no concern for the fact that he's a selfish, egotistical character who's a disgrace to the game and a disruption in the dressing room. Just needed the self proclaimed "moish whinnhaah" Ferrari back for the big games. And this is what they've done it all for. One giant liability.
siddhu Posted December 9, 2007 Posted December 9, 2007 Yup. The PCB disgraced their team and themselves by bending rules and regulations to bring Akhtar back prematurely after that drug ban looked to have potentially called time on his career (he'd have been 33 by the time it ended, not an age favouring a comeback). Then after his incident with Asif, they gave him a carefully timed ban designed to let him still take part in the India tests. No concern for team dynamics, no concern for the fact that he's a selfish, egotistical character who's a disgrace to the game and a disruption in the dressing room. Just needed the self proclaimed "moish whinnhaah" Ferrari back for the big games. And this is what they've done it all for. One giant liability. Now they will somehow make him a scapegoat for both the series loss and they prove themselves even bigger loosers... ise kehte hain "chit bhi meri aur pat bhi meri"
King Posted December 9, 2007 Posted December 9, 2007 Yup. The PCB disgraced their team and themselves by bending rules and regulations to bring Akhtar back prematurely after that drug ban looked to have potentially called time on his career (he'd have been 33 by the time it ended, not an age favouring a comeback). Then after his incident with Asif, they gave him a carefully timed ban designed to let him still take part in the India tests. No concern for team dynamics, no concern for the fact that he's a selfish, egotistical character who's a disgrace to the game and a disruption in the dressing room. Just needed the self proclaimed "moish whinnhaah" Ferrari back for the big games. And this is what they've done it all for. One giant liability. Yup, can't describe any better the plight.
riya Posted December 9, 2007 Posted December 9, 2007 The trouble with shoaib Akhtar ,being Akhtar he thinks that Indians should give wickets in a platter to him when he bowls 10 overs .What the heck? He didn't get any wickets .He started thinking about his statistics ,his match winning(overhyped ) ability etc .Now they can and he can claim that he was unfit blah blah......Finding for excuses .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now