Random Stat

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Cricketics]

yeah I know I have heard that ... shows the diff in levels isnt it ? But in his debut inngs he came in as a Nightwatchman ... which is why he is listed at #5 :D

yaa.. a lot diff. meanwhile players like cuffy, were here too.. playing for windies club..

[Dhondy]

man BossBhai - u rock. How the eff do you come up with all this...thanks

He's rocked for a long time. If he had the time, he'd set up his own interactive stats-package- unrivalled by Statsguru, Howstat or any other instrument, so that every member of this board could run his own query without relying on him. Unfortunately, we haven't seen enough appetite for that kind of thing, so can't take the leap of faith. We are a heartbeat away from making this the most stats-oriented cricket site in the world, every argument, every debate backed up by the bedrock of objectivity. But enough people have to ask.

[Chandan]

Full list of bowlers tried . PS: Raju batted at No.5 in his debut test hence the list is 35+1

Raju at #5? Must have been sent as night watchman in his very first match! Otherwise I just can't imagine how one can plan beforehand to make him bat at that position!!:D :thumbs_up: for the stats. Wonderfully done. And it also goes on to show how we've played with such an unsettled attack all these years and that explains our somewhat dismal performance in tests through most of 90s.

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --