Malcolm Merlyn Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 The World's Hottest Sports League Two years ago, IPL cricket was a pipe dream. Now it's the fastest-appreciating sports business on Earth. The season opener was mere moments away when the Washington Redskins cheerleaders marched to mid-field to perform a routine that brought the crowd--draped in red and yellow team colors--to its feet. No, it wasn't a late-summer night at Maryland's FedEx Field, but rather a sweltering April evening in Bangalore's Chinnaswamy Stadium and the inaugural match of the Indian Premier League (IPL), cricket's first foray, from a business prospective, into the major leagues. The 2008 match between the Royal Challengers Bangalore (the team's owner, Vijay Mallya's United Breweries, hired the cheerleaders for four games) and the Kolkata Knight Riders (co-owned by Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan) was seen by 40,000 spectators, 14.4 million TV viewers in India and millions more watching on the eight networks that syndicated coverage across the globe. Signs above the playing field were branded with Citi ( C - news - people ), Sony ( SNE - news - people ) and Vodafone ( VOD - news - people ) logos, just to name a few. Not exactly humble origins. Welcome to the hottest sports league in the world. IPL has been served well to the audience, hence they have grabbed it!If you plan well for a "CAUSE" you are bound to succeed and thats what Mr. Lalit Modi has done and is still doing!!What FIFA is pl.... Comment On This Story Our first round-up of the IPL's finances shows the league generated $209 million in revenue in its second season, for an aggregate operating profit (earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation) of $89 million. The average franchise is worth $67 million, a 31% increase in just one year. The Rajasthan Royals, winners of the league's first championship, has risen in value by 71%. This despite the uncertainty and logistical headaches caused by moving this year's entire 59-game slate, including the final, to South Africa with only three weeks' notice. (After terror incidents, the Indian government was anxious about providing security as parliamentary elections coincided with the month-long season.) The IPL was conceived in 2007 near some hallowed ground for sports: in London's Wimbledon suburb. There, Lalit Modi, representing the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the governing body of Indian cricket, and Andrew Wildblood, an executive at sports management powerhouse IMG, discussed the disconnect between cricket's worldwide popularity and the lack of commercial success of any domestic league. Their solution: a franchise ownership structure modeled after top U.S. sports leagues. Since then, the league has grown at breakneck speed. In January 2008, eight IPL teams were auctioned for a combined $724 million (to be paid in 10 annual installments to the nonprofit BCCI, an umbrella for the IPL). Just three months later, the Redskins' "First Ladies of Football" were flown in to shake their pom-poms at the sold-out opener. Proceeds from the auction, as well as portions of national media and sponsorship deals, are reinvested, mostly in India's aging (as far back as the 19th century) cricket stadiums, including some of the 10 rented by IPL teams for $100,000 per match. How successful was that first season? The 2008 semifinals and final drew 62 million viewers in India, with a per-match average of 11% of the nation's total cable audience. In the months that followed, Modi, now IPL commissioner, opted out of TV deals with Sony and World Sports Group, risking nearly $1 billion of guaranteed payments over the next nine years. The gamble paid off, to the tune of a 98% annual increase from those broadcast partners, both of which deemed the IPL too valuable a property to lose. One reason the league is so TV-friendly is its format: Matches are held under Twenty20 rules that speed up each contest to about three hours (a traditional cricket match can last days, with tea breaks). The format is sweeping cricket worldwide. Revenue from TV, mobile and digital rights deals totaled $100 million for the latest season, of which teams split an 80% share equally. They also divvied up 60% of the $40 million in league sponsorships, including a cool $10 million from the league's title sponsor, DLF, India's largest real estate firm, and $5.5 million from motorbike maker Hero Honda. Despite playing 5,000 miles away, Indian companies actually increased spending on team sponsorships, which grew by 60% to a collective $60 million. Ground staff scurried to change signage before every match so that none of the floating teams' advertisers were underrepresented. Ticket sales did not go as smoothly. The move led to a 75% drop in gate receipts, as prices were slashed to fill up stadiums to make the product more appealing on TV. That must have worked: This year, the final's telecast reached 24% more viewers in India than in 2008. Even Modi is surprised by how quickly the league has grown. "At the beginning there were not many bidders who were conscious of the fact that the league would succeed, and they had to bid on total blind faith. There was no history, everybody was writing against it, there was no support for it," he says. Then the first season averaged 58,000 fans per match (80% more than a typical Major League Baseball game), and new investors clamored to climb aboard. In February, an ownership group that includes Lachlan Murdoch, the son of media baron Rupert Murdoch, sold a minority stake in the Rajasthan Royals to investors fronted by actress Shilpa Shetty in a deal that reflected the rapid value appreciation. Just last year, the Royals were auctioned for a league-low $67 million over 10 years. Our survey of franchise values is determined by multiples of revenue from continuing operations, except in cases where teams are on the verge of gaining additional money and exposure. Example: The Delhi Daredevils will play for a share of a $6 million purse in the inaugural Twenty20 Champions League this fall, on top of receiving $500,000 just for participating in the tournament. Since up to half of team revenue is accrued by dint of gate receipts, local sponsorships and merchandising--revenue streams of which teams share little with the league--market size plays a major role in making some franchises more valuable than others.Appreciation is based on the multiple of the money already paid for 2 years and not 10 years. Take the Mumbai Indians, who play before a robust corporate base in India's largest city. The Indians are the IPL's most valuable team, worth $80 million for the owner, oil and gas giant Reliance Industries and company chairman and largest shareholder Mukesh Ambani, India's wealthiest man. Sensing Mumbai as the IPL's signature brand, akin to the English football's Manchester United or baseball's New York Yankees, companies from outside of India, like Adidas ( ADDDY.PK - news - people ) and MasterCard ( MA - news - people ), have been quick to sponsor the team. Over two seasons, Mumbai's $43 million in revenue tops the IPL. Some of the IPL's cachet comes from its owners: Khan uses the resources of his film company, Red Chillies Entertainment, to promote Kolkata and expand the team's reach into new markets. His strategy is paying off. Polls consistently rank the Knight Riders as India's most popular team, and they're already more valuable than two teams that were sold at higher auction prices only a year and a half ago. Such hands-on management is a far cry from the Stanford Super Series, the defunct Twenty20 competition between the English national team and all-stars from around the West Indies that was bankrolled by alleged Ponzi schemer R. Allen Stanford and thought to be competition for the IPL. Instead, after only one year, the SSS joined an alphabet soup of failed cricket ventures, including the IISC, WSC and APC. Cricket has been played internationally for 165 years and was once a contest at the Olympics. With 104 nations as members of cricket's governing body, it's one of the most popular sports in the world. But before the IPL, professional leagues had never truly been run as a business. Most leagues around the world are operated by nonprofit entities and teams owned by athletic clubs with thousands of members; often, making money is a low priority. Says Donald Lockerbie, chief executive of the USA Cricket Association, "[English cricket] is as traditional a sport as there is. It's essentially a club membership drive." National teams have always been cricket's top draw. But private franchise ownership coupled with the commercial possibilities of the new, abbreviated version of the game in India's cricket crazed marketplace has upended the sport's established order. It's also made Modi into cricket's most influential (if polarizing) figure, for whom profit always trumps tradition. A brash and charismatic promoter, he's the subcontinent's answer to Don King. In April he hired around-the-clock security after reportedly receiving death threats from the mob, the gambling operations of which stood to take a hit from the season moving to South Africa. Unfazed, Modi is already laying the groundwork for the IPL's next chapter. "We plan to have another shorter [season] that will move around the world, with a main league that will stay in India," he says. Another plan to boost league coffers is to add more teams. IMG's Wildblood projects expansion as early as 2011 with the IPL adding one or two more squads. Unlike in the early days, bidders will have a sense of the league's long-term prospects. "I think a lot of people discounted the fact that there was any value," Modi says. Not anymore. SOURCE So much for the people who called IPL a circus and worth less league.......Forbes is not an Indian magazine so its a neutral view............ Link to comment
The Outsider Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 So much for the people who called IPL a circus and worth less league.......Forbes is not an Indian magazine so its a neutral view............ Huh? What does Forbes know about cricket? IPL is a circus, not worthless by any means though. I don't think any sane person questioned the financial viability of IPL, but did you take a look at the junk it produces in the name of cricket where cowlashers like some Bangalore opener get touted as the next best thing in cricket and people like Atul Sharma who has not bowled a competitive delivery for 7 years become the future. It's been 2 seasons and can you name 5 cricketers who struck it at the international level because of IPL? Link to comment
DomainK Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 IPL is a circus. A circus that entertains, a circus that sells, a circus that is popular. But it is a circus. I like the circus, but not for the quality of cricket. Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted August 30, 2009 Author Share Posted August 30, 2009 Huh? What does Forbes know about cricket? IPL is a circus, not worthless by any means though. I don't think any sane person questioned the financial viability of IPL, but did you take a look at the junk it produces in the name of cricket where cowlashers like some Bangalore opener get touted as the next best thing in cricket and people like Atul Sharma who has not bowled a competitive delivery for 7 years become the future. It's been 2 seasons and can you name 5 cricketers who struck it at the international level because of IPL? Shaun Marsh Yusuf Pathan Dirk Nannes Which league produces 5 internatinal cricketers per year???? Atul Sharma never hyped by IPL....but by Ian Pont Manish Pandey os a 19 yr old and who said he is the next big thing??? IPL is entertaining and it has some quality Link to comment
cowboysfan Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Huh? What does Forbes know about cricket? IPL is a circus, not worthless by any means though. I don't think any sane person questioned the financial viability of IPL, but did you take a look at the junk it produces in the name of cricket where cowlashers like some Bangalore opener get touted as the next best thing in cricket and people like Atul Sharma who has not bowled a competitive delivery for 7 years become the future. It's been 2 seasons and can you name 5 cricketers who struck it at the international level because of IPL? he,leave bangalore out of this:giggle:.did you really expect international cricketers to come out of IPL.you will find that its the other way around in most cases and everybody is fine that.to expect otherwise is a fallacy. Link to comment
zubinpepsi Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Shaun Marsh Yusuf Pathan Dirk Nannes Which league produces 5 internatinal cricketers per year???? Atul Sharma never hyped by IPL....but by Ian Pont Manish Pandey os a 19 yr old and who said he is the next big thing??? IPL is entertaining and it has some quality :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Yusuf Pathan was already int he T20 team even b4 IPL started.. and Dirk Nannes has been playing in australia since 2006raking up wkts.. got any new names bud?? Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted August 30, 2009 Author Share Posted August 30, 2009 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Yusuf Pathan was already int he T20 team even b4 IPL started.. and Dirk Nannes has been playing in australia since 2006raking up wkts.. got any new names bud?? IPL is 2 yrs old........give it soem time buddy...... Link to comment
The Outsider Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Shaun Marsh Yusuf Pathan Dirk Nannes Which league produces 5 internatinal cricketers per year???? Atul Sharma never hyped by IPL....but by Ian Pont Manish Pandey os a 19 yr old and who said he is the next big thing??? IPL is entertaining and it has some quality Errr......where is Shaun Marsh today? Nannes has been a quality performer in Aussies domestics forever. Look at Pathan's numbers in Ranji if you ever get time outside that IPL!! Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted August 30, 2009 Author Share Posted August 30, 2009 Errr......where is Shaun Marsh today? Nannes has been a quality performer in Aussies domestics forever. Look at Pathan's numbers in Ranji if you ever get time outside that IPL!! i do follow ranji..........btw i was talking about T20 performance.......you cant expect a 6 weeks leagur to throw up test players but it will give some quality T20 players.....give it some time....things take time to mature Nannes was playing in australia league did he get selected to australia team???? give some credit to the league Link to comment
The Outsider Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Manish Pandey os a 19 yr old and who said he is the next big thing??? Man, there were exclusive threads devoted to that cowlasher on ICF......you can search for them. Some delusional people were clamoring for his inclusion in the Indian team after IPL every time our squad was announced. Link to comment
EnterTheVoid Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 IPL is a shytty tournament that no body cares about. Thats why every self respecting cricket board are hunting in their droves looking for a copy. IPL, PPL, P20, Stanford etc etc Ask Pakistan what they'd give for an IPL copy. You can bet every penny they'd flag their IPL copy at every opportunity to bring cricket to Pakistan. Link to comment
The Outsider Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 i do follow ranji..........btw i was talking about T20 performance.......you cant expect a 6 weeks leagur to throw up test players but it will give some quality T20 players.....give it some time....things take time to mature Nannes was playing in australia league did he get selected to australia team???? give some credit to the league Nannes was on the fringe of selection for a very long time. Quality T20 players? There is no quality in T20 to begin with - it's a format which hypes cowlashers and dibbly dobbly bowlers. It might be the future of cricket but I would rather watch Baseball than that crap. Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted August 30, 2009 Author Share Posted August 30, 2009 Nannes was on the fringe of selection for a very long time. Quality T20 players? There is no quality in T20 to begin with - it's a format which hypes cowlashers and dibbly dobbly bowlers. It might be the future of cricket but I would rather watch Baseball than that crap. hmmmm..........well it mite be the format that may make cricket an internatinal game in true sense Link to comment
zubinpepsi Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 IPL is a shytty tournament that no body cares about. Thats why every self respecting cricket board are hunting in their droves looking for a copy. IPL, PPL, P20, Stanford etc etc Ask Pakistan what they'd give for an IPL copy. You can bet every penny they'd flag their IPL copy at every opportunity to bring cricket to Pakistan. do you have to bring pakistan in this thread??? man some guys r living with secere insecurity... Link to comment
zubinpepsi Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Man' date=' [b']there were exclusive threads devoted to that cowlasher on ICF......you can search for them. Some delusional people were clamoring for his inclusion in the Indian team after IPL every time our squad was announced. :cantstop: luv this cowlasher term.. Link to comment
The Outsider Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 hmmmm..........well it mite be the format that may make cricket an internatinal game in true sense I don't want an "international" game of cricket......I want competitive quality test cricket. Link to comment
ludhianvi Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Why do people not like IPL and hatred towards it? Is it because in just two years it can/has shaken the foundations of a century old game and claims to erase the memories of another ~40 year old format? If it can do that, then perhaps the foundations were made of clay. Everything is ever evolving and like it or not, cricket is no different. You can get all nostalgic and all but IPL is expanding and the only thing that is going to stop this juggernaut is itself. Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted August 30, 2009 Author Share Posted August 30, 2009 I don't want an "international" game of cricket......I want competitive quality test cricket. Test cricket is ofcourse the pinnacle and the greatest player and the best teams will be judges by that......But this format will make it reach the masses......by no means i mean to say that this is a great format to show case skills...itz just an avenue for some entertaining cricket Something like the amwerican baseball......short and crisp and entertaining Link to comment
The Outsider Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Why do people not like IPL and hatred towards it? Is it because in just two years it can/has shaken the foundations of a century old game and claims to erase the memories of another ~40 year old format? If it can do that' date=' then perhaps the foundations were made of clay. Everything is ever evolving and like it or not, cricket is no different. You can get all nostalgic and all but IPL is expanding and the only thing that is going to stop this juggernaut is itself.[/quote'] Because T20 is not cricket. It's a format where awwal darje ke chewtias like Afridi win Man of the Series awards in two successive World Cups. Fine, it might be the future of cricket, but being an oldie I would rather stick to watching reruns of past test matches than follow that nonsense. Link to comment
Mr. Wicket Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Nannes was on the fringe of selection for a very long time. Quality T20 players? There is no quality in T20 to begin with - it's a format which hypes cowlashers and dibbly dobbly bowlers. It might be the future of cricket but I would rather watch Baseball than that crap. Agreed. I'd rather see David Ortiz smashing a few than David Warner, Afridi or this week's cowlasher flavour of the month slogger. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now