Jump to content

Best strategy to deal with Kashmiri Stone pelters


narenpande1

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

1. The 'strategy' for 370 is no big secret. It involves getting a BJP majority in Rajya Sabha. Which will take time, because it will happen only when BJP controls majority of state legislatures AND the previous round of state-nominated Rajya Sabha members retire. So its going to take another 4-6 years for BJP to get Rajya Sabha majority. And without Rajya Sabha majority, we cannot repeal 370.

 

2. Security was a big issue when the Pandits were evicted. Since then, security has improved massively. But its always harder to convince refugees to go back to their homes, if it isn't completely safe. IMO, if the Pandits were in the valley today, they wouldn't be leaving. 

 

3. yes, security apparatus needs to improve. But what India (including Kashmir) requires, is a massive expansion in judiciary branch. More judges, jails and courthouses. That way, any violence against property and person will be processed a lot faster. We need western standard turnarounds in property disputes & attacks on person - i.e. ~ 2-6 months to resolution. Or else, it becomes hard to deter crime when people can post bail and hang around for years till trial. (No credible judicial system will refuse bail till trial for small-time crime, especially first offence against property or person, especially if its small time vandalism and assault).

 

4. We need better trained police. Military are not police, yet they are forced to do the job of the police. Which is patently unfair to them. Its like putting a trained killer (which is what the military are) to be the hall monitor and dispute resolution personnel.  The military is trained to kill. Not to de-escalate and keep the peace. That is the job of the police.

 

5. We also need a western style RCMP/FBI branch of the police. That is directly under the control of the centre. Otherwise our police force becomes mired in state level politics and corrupt. Which is the case currently. State-level police is fine for micro-managing the police force. But we also need a police force that is directly under the command of the centre. 

 

Show to country the reality of much of Kashmiri Netas and people to justify president's rule. Impose indefinite president's rule, the police comes under central Govt. Near LS election of 2019, repeal art. 370. Seems like a plan.

 

Anyways, since people wouldn't go to settle first as militants can come n attack women, children and old, we need to settle armed soldiers in galis and nukkads of kashmir. with time, as they surrender mentally, militancy dies down, civilians from rest of india will also come.

 

Edited by randomGuy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, randomGuy said:

Show to country the reality of much of Kashmiri Netas and people to justify president's rule. Impose indefinite president's rule, the police comes under central Govt. Near LS election of 2019, repeal art. 370. Seems like a plan.

 

Anyways, since people wouldn't go to settle first as militants can come n attack women, children and old, we need to settle armed soldiers in galis and nukkads of kashmir. with time, as they surrender mentally, militancy dies down, civilians from rest of india will also come.

 

Bhai, president's rule is a short term option. The only excuse can be 'law and order' to impose president's rule. And these Pakistan-funded stone throwers will go all quiet. Then what ? You must end president's rule sometime. Maybe 1 year ? 2 years ? At-most 5-7 years. Then it will be 'back to today' as soon as it ends. And then President's rule again ? Cycle continues.

 

A solution for Kashmir will take 30-40 years. We don't need women, children and the old. Just migrant workers who leave villages to go to cities. There are hundreds of millions of them. Give them 10% wages paid on top by government and 50% less income tax and the more desperate ones will go. Let them go first. They will settle, they will marry and dilute the Kashmiriyat. 


I'd rather have well armed policemen than soldiers- soldiers are meant to be killing machines, not long term police. Doing so, is going to make them go soft AND create more body-count than necessary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...