Desi Cartman Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 Thanks .. so if India can get couple of early wickets of inexperienced openers then they are more than likely to struggle to even get to 300 ...
Cricketics Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 statz idea would be good only when WACA TEST stas are exposed.. btw, good on u bheem for releasing those stats...thanks for that. can u bring waca ground stats when aus are chasing and have lost early wickets.. surely cricnfo's statz guru suck @ that
Desi Cartman Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 the above stats anyway show that ALL sides struggle if they lose couple of early wickets so now we can fairly blame Jaffer for the first 2 tests
Cricketics Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 and if we dont get early breakthroughs the avg 4th inngs total for Aussies is 319 which is almost double :nervous: well there tail is not that great this time around.. surely with brad hogg in there , it looked decent just like englandz tail with ashley gilez in it...
Cricketics Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 bheem, classic, fantastic thanks mate,, but can u expalin those statz a bit and i will pick it up rite away..
Cricketics Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 never mind bheem i got it, understood thanks
Desi Cartman Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 Now this is worrying guys ... India Australia 342 8 339
Cricketics Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 lol ... all 4th innings chases for Aus at Perth ... and the result ' date='target , wkts lost & opposition are listed as well ... this ground has very few matches played on it compared to other Aus grounds hence the smallish looking list.[/quote'] ya replied at same time.. it sucks that such few matches have been played and also mostly played against england.. thanks for the stats though
Cricketics Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 Now this is worrying guys ... India Australia 342 8 339 lol that was in 1977 dude, none of the current bowlerz were playing.. haha and none of the aussie batsman were there
Desi Cartman Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 lol that was in 1992 dude' date=' none of the current bowlerz were playing.. haha and none of the aussie batsman were there[/quote'] oh ok but I still think if India sets them anything lesser than 350 then Aussies have more chances of winning :nervous:
OriginalCopy Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 most aussie big names had moved over to the Packer camp ... And many here weren't even an itch in the pants :haha:
dial_100 Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 another thing I noticed is that very good fast bowlers always got the team out for less than 400 runs. Only our team with good fast bowler + a good spinner are exceptions. Part time spinners never worked there... Even english spinners, SL spinner and NZ spinners didn;t work much. Kumble is a different breed. Besides us only WI managed a good show there with Ambrose, Walsh & co. So chances are Aus will find it very difficult to keep the momentum going to win. To win, they will need 100 runs partnerships 2 50 runs partnerships 2 10 runs partnerships 3 and rest are 5 runs per wkt. so basically, 200 + 100 + 30 + 15 would be = 345 now this will need some efforts... Now think that do they have 7-8 batsman to give 2 big and 2 medium partnerships??? I doubt its possible. If we manage more 3-4 wkts in first 25 overs then we have the game....or else anything is possible.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now