Avg Aus Team Score when they lose early wkts

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Desi Cartman]

Thanks .. so if India can get couple of early wickets of inexperienced openers then they are more than likely to struggle to even get to 300 ...

[arkay]

is this for last innings?

[Cricketics]

statz idea would be good only when WACA TEST stas are exposed.. btw, good on u bheem for releasing those stats...thanks for that. can u bring waca ground stats when aus are chasing and have lost early wickets.. surely cricnfo's statz guru suck @ that

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Desi Cartman]

the above stats anyway show that ALL sides struggle if they lose couple of early wickets so now we can fairly blame Jaffer for the first 2 tests

[Cricketics]

and if we dont get early breakthroughs the avg 4th inngs total for Aussies is 319 which is almost double :nervous:

well there tail is not that great this time around.. surely with brad hogg in there , it looked decent just like englandz tail with ashley gilez in it...

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Cricketics]

bheem, classic, fantastic thanks mate,, but can u expalin those statz a bit and i will pick it up rite away..

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Cricketics]

never mind bheem i got it, understood thanks

[Desi Cartman]

Now this is worrying guys ... India Australia 342 8 339

[Cricketics]

lol ... all 4th innings chases for Aus at Perth ... and the result ' date='target , wkts lost & opposition are listed as well ... this ground has very few matches played on it compared to other Aus grounds hence the smallish looking list.[/quote'] ya replied at same time.. it sucks that such few matches have been played and also mostly played against england.. thanks for the stats though

[Cricketics]

Now this is worrying guys ... India Australia 342 8 339

lol that was in 1977 dude, none of the current bowlerz were playing.. haha and none of the aussie batsman were there

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Desi Cartman]

lol that was in 1992 dude' date=' none of the current bowlerz were playing.. haha and none of the aussie batsman were there[/quote'] oh ok but I still think if India sets them anything lesser than 350 then Aussies have more chances of winning :nervous:

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[OriginalCopy]

most aussie big names had moved over to the Packer camp ...

And many here weren't even an itch in the pants :haha:

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[dial_100]

another thing I noticed is that very good fast bowlers always got the team out for less than 400 runs. Only our team with good fast bowler + a good spinner are exceptions. Part time spinners never worked there... Even english spinners, SL spinner and NZ spinners didn;t work much. Kumble is a different breed. Besides us only WI managed a good show there with Ambrose, Walsh & co. So chances are Aus will find it very difficult to keep the momentum going to win. To win, they will need 100 runs partnerships 2 50 runs partnerships 2 10 runs partnerships 3 and rest are 5 runs per wkt. so basically, 200 + 100 + 30 + 15 would be = 345 now this will need some efforts... Now think that do they have 7-8 batsman to give 2 big and 2 medium partnerships??? I doubt its possible. If we manage more 3-4 wkts in first 25 overs then we have the game....or else anything is possible.