Hypothetical Question

[msb1991]

Hi all, I doubt that this would or even can be answered truthfully but I was wondering that if the shoe was on the other foot and it was alleged that an Australian player was racist to an Indian player, would you have disregarded a lack of concrete evidence and called for the player's head, so to speak. Msb1991

[The Outsider]

Why would you need the shoe to be in another foot when even in this foot majority of the board has said that Harbhajan should have been punished if evidence was found against him.

[King Tendulkar]

Called for the aussies head, as well as their captains and their prime minsters. Then declared war on australia! I voted for the first option by the way!

[msb1991]

Why would you need the shoe to be in another foot when even in this foot majority of the board has said that Harbhajan should have been punished if evidence was found against him.

Because we are talking about an identical situation, therefore, the same evidence (or lack therof) as in real life.

[Sachinism]

i'd be more pissed off about my team BSing like aus has been doing

[Bumper]

I am of the view that people who are willing to dish out should be prepared to take a bit of that. We neednt imagine an Aussie player being abusive. There are plenty of instances of such abuse in the past (many well documented) & I dont recall any opponent complaining. Even when the abuse was as blatant (as in the case of McGrath - Sarwan), the match referee simply chose to look the other way

[Sachinism]

Aussies are just crying coz things didnt go their way they need to stop whining and realise there is a new super power about