siddhu Posted February 24, 2008 Posted February 24, 2008 The entire series he fails batting on a slightly bowler oriented pitch and once he gets a batting paradise he goes and scores a century.... what does that tell you about this crybaby:finger:
CC1981 Posted February 24, 2008 Posted February 24, 2008 Tendulkar failed all series. What does that tell you about Tendy then ? Seriously, Ponting is a great ODI player...show some respect, dude...enough of the namecalling and 'crybaby' nonsense- Ponting would walk into an Indian alltime team if he were an Indian- in any format, any era. That should be enough for Indians to show some respect towards his cricketing prowess.
Cricketics Posted February 24, 2008 Posted February 24, 2008 irrelevant man.. PUnter has scored over 30 test centuries.. about 25 odi tonz.. why u call such player a FTB.. i have no idea..
Rajiv Posted February 24, 2008 Posted February 24, 2008 Whats wrong with you idiots FTB=Full Time Batsman
Cricketics Posted February 24, 2008 Posted February 24, 2008 Whats wrong with you idiots FTB=Full Time Batsman I WOUld agree with the OP if FTB meanz - FULL TIME BEVADA
siddhu Posted February 24, 2008 Author Posted February 24, 2008 Tendulkar failed all series. What does that tell you about Tendy then ? Seriously, Ponting is a great ODI player...show some respect, dude...enough of the namecalling and 'crybaby' nonsense- Ponting would walk into an Indian alltime team if he were an Indian- in any format, any era. That should be enough for Indians to show some respect towards his cricketing prowess. sorry no respect for that man.... had a lot of respect for him but lost it this series
16 str8 Posted February 24, 2008 Posted February 24, 2008 The entire series he fails batting on a slightly bowler oriented pitch and once he gets a batting paradise he goes and scores a century.... what does that tell you about this crybaby:finger: India 3-47!! Maybe you should have waited until both teams had batted. You know, would have saved yourself the embarrisment and all. :hysterical::haha::hysterical::haha:
siddhu Posted February 24, 2008 Author Posted February 24, 2008 India 3-47!! Maybe you should have waited until both teams had batted. You know, would have saved yourself the embarrisment and all. :hysterical::haha::hysterical::haha: 47-3 is due to good bowling rather than bad batting... and it was bound to happen due to pressure of chasing...
Dhondy Posted February 24, 2008 Posted February 24, 2008 I'm cheering for the IPL "underdogs" here. Go Ponting, Hayden, Bracken, Clarke. Just because you are valued at a million dollars a year doesn't mean you are not rubbish.
siddhu Posted February 24, 2008 Author Posted February 24, 2008 India 3-47!! Maybe you should have waited until both teams had batted. You know, would have saved yourself the embarrisment and all. :hysterical::haha::hysterical::haha: ahem.... Indian batsmen also almost reached that score. and that too when 47/3 and 52/4. With the famed seniors back in the dressing room.. Gambhir played an exceptional innings under pressure with lower order batsmen and tail enders...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now