Ishant Sharma- pathetic bowling, disguzting fielding and zero commitment

[Guest whineleg]

Could it be that Ishant has now become trundler? I think so its true. team wants him to be selfish like sachin and sehwag so they told him to become trundler, losing pace. now his bowling is disgusting. 6-0-35-0 are the worst figures in history of indian cricket. he is useless and maybe itz coz he is injured??? he is hiding injury to collect match fee. oh why oh why iz our team so bad, they are dizgraceful and so selfish. we will lose by innings and 500 runs and ishant must not play for india again coz he is disgusting trundler. :pray:

[Desi Cartman]

:cry_smile::cry_smile::cry_smile::cry_smile::cry_smile::cry_smile: :mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama:

[graphic23]

He has set out to create history today. Those figures of 6-0-35-0 will improve to a phenomenal figure of 20-0-200-0 in the next 16 overs, and he'll be celebrating within himself. Such a horrible bowler. Whoever asked him to become a bowler should be thrown into jail and the team management for playing him should be asked to retire from cricket. Such a disgraceful, awful, selfish, arrogant, foolish bowler. Ugh.

[Guest whineleg]

:cry_smile::cry_smile::cry_smile::cry_smile::cry_smile::cry_smile: :mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama::mama:

you cannot accept the reality and this iz sad.

[Tapioca]

he is hiding injury to collect match fee.

Certainly not. If he were zelfish, he would have hidden it for this match too so as to make sure that he could play in the ayepeeyell

[Guest whineleg]

Certainly not. If he were zelfish' date=' he would have hidden it for this match too so as to make sure that he could play in the ayepeeyell[/quote'] he knowz he will play IPL anywayz, so he decide to make extra bonus in this match. SA will score 850/2 declared and india will have to bat twicez so he won't have to bowl much. only 20 overz and pitch waz also prepared for spinnerz so he knew he would not have to bowl more than 18 to 20 overz. it all makez perfect zenze. itz all part of the plan of the selfish indian cricketerz. I can quote articlez from TOI if you don't believe me

[diegovegaz]

u cannot blame ishant he is coming out of an injury, after a month even the wicket isn't good for his kind of bowling but he did beat smith with a yorker, n got an edge as well

[Tapioca]

u cannot blame ishant he is coming out of an injury, after a month even the wicket isn't good for his kind of bowling but he did beat smith with a yorker, n got an edge as well

Agree. Whenever someone comes back from injury, it is acceptable if they fail in the next three or four matches.

[Mr. Wicket]

Agree. Whenever someone comes back from injury' date=' it is acceptable if they fail in the next three or four matches.[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

[DomainK]

even the wicket isn't good for his kind of bowling

Since when wickets started following a bolwer's requirement? You have to bowl according to the wicket.

[msb1991]

he is coming out of an injury, after a month even the wicket isn't good for his kind of bowling

Then why pick him?

[Zakhmi]

u cannot blame ishant he is coming out of an injury, after a month even the wicket isn't good for his kind of bowling but he did beat smith with a yorker, n got an edge as well

Agreed as it was expected only... we cannot blame Ishant, instead blame the selectors for giving him responsibility as the strike bowler ( he needs some experience to bowl on different kinda wickets and different batsmen )... he is coming out of injury after a month, he may need some time to generate pace...may be 5-6 days more, if and only if the pitch is of Australia type ( Indian pitches aren't his kinda stuff ) wickets aren't good...which other excuse is so much safe to escape from responsibilities and own shortcomings ( the same pitches will be used by opponents to oppress our batsman, so that we wind up for 76 ) yes, its really a great achievement that Smith was beaten by him with a yorker ( mostly batsmen get beaten with yorkers ), one time edge is enough for safe-guarding our hero, Ishant Sharma ( what more should we expect? ) He took Amla's wkt also ( bonus for us )...

[Cricketics]

atleast unlike other Indian seamers, he is able to pick up wicket of settled batsman who has alredy scored a 150 in this series

[Zakhmi]

atleast unlike other Indian seamers' date=' he is able to pick up wicket of settled batsman who has alredy scored a 150 in this series[/quote'] yes, atleast he could strike after the batsmen get settled down...

[hatja_tau]

Uhoo uhoo... Boucher gone!, stumps rattled!

[hatja_tau]

uhooooooooo uhoooooooooooo....man is it TB???..lol Another one bites the dust!...well bowled Ishant, better than RP+Sree the whole series!

[Chaos]

haha where did this f@g goo???????

[Chaos]

this guy has REAL talent. Sad we didnt have our bowler's fit for 2nd test >

[Vignesh]

@ Whineleg Where do you let ur face in now????? Jus dont underestimate people particularly INDIANS you piece of crap..... He has 3 wickets.......... and along with bhajji has brought India Back in this game.....

[Zakhmi]

this guy has REAL talent. Sad we didnt have our bowler's fit for 2nd test ><

Amla b Sharma 51 101 6 0 Boucher b Sharma 29 59 3 0 Harris b Sharma 12 31 2 0

agreed, he if far better than our unwanted all-rounder IKP. But, he is not at his best. Here, he bowled intelligently on line and length - 3 scalps through scattering the stumps. May be, we need surfaces like in Australia.