Pak v WI 3rd test

[King]

Pakistan now moving along nicely to 167/3 and as usual a customary 50 by Yousuf. Inzi has just claimed Yousuf is a better batsman than Javed Miandad. That pretty much says Inzi rates himself less than these two. I disagree with Inzi of course.

[Dhondy]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test Third Statement, Ravi? Were you thinking of the Testaments? Meanwhile, Inzamam finds a way of getting out to Darren Ganga, of all people. Is the foremost slayer of fast bowling of his time the world over, the conquerer of Donald in SA and McGrath in Australia, finally finished?

[King Tendulkar]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test I think age has caught up with him. After the world cup I think he may retire.

[King]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test

Third Statement' date=' Ravi? Were you thinking of the [b']Testaments? Meanwhile, Inzamam finds a way of getting out to Darren Ganga, of all people. Is the foremost slayer of fast bowling of his time the world over, the conquerer of Donald in SA and McGrath in Australia, finally finished?

Thanks for pointing out Dhondy. This is the result of multitasking. I have been working on something critical and also posting. The statement was to go in the doco and test here but test ended up in the project doc while statement ended up here :hic:

[Dhondy]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test

[Dhondy]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test Malik gone to Taylor. Mohammad Bradman bats on.

[King Tendulkar]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test

Malik gone to Taylor. Mohammad Bradman bats on.

Bradman, don't even go there. Mohammad FTB. He is on 97 as eases to another FTB 100

[Gambit]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test This guy has done ballistic. Will probably break Viv's record.

[King Tendulkar]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test 100 for mo yo and he does the standard, ridiculous, overt look at me religious celebration.

[King Tendulkar]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test moyo gone lbw Pak struggling at 239 for 6 on the slowest, flattest track you will ever see. Come on the windies clean up the tale now

[MundaPakistani]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test Excellent performance from the WI and from the PAK POV M Yousuf was the only positive.I recko the pitch is sluggish and there is a bit of swing for the fast bowlers too so scoring wont be easy(unless you are Lara or Yousuf)

[yoda]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test 272-9. Collymore bowls a beauty to Akmal and uproots his middle stump.

[Gambit]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test Lara goes for a duck on a pitch slightly assisting the bowlers.

[MundaPakistani]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test Umar Gul and Kaneria have put PAK on top....Gul's post lunch spell was simply brilliant! The Karachi crowd was right behind him too....kind of like when Waqar Younis used to charge in all those years ago!

[MundaPakistani]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test M Yousuf has done it.....Viv's record is history! PAK only 2 down at lunch

[Guest dada_rocks]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test Even hafeez is scoring century after century tell u all u need to know about wicket and quality of attack

[Guest dada_rocks]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test allo comes in the middle

[King]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test Still a good enough effort by Yousuf. Scoring these may runs on whatever track and whatever attack is good stuff. It takes a ball for the batter to get out and he has kept that ball at bay shows he is in the best of his form ever. I remember an article on crickinfo about a year or so ago, the writer was asking Yousuf to be sacked as he never really scored when required. Wonder what the writer would be thinking now.

[Guest dada_rocks]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test

Still a good enough effort by Yousuf. Scoring these may runs on whatever track and whatever attack is good stuff. It takes a ball for the batter to get out and he has kept that ball at bay shows he is in the best of his form ever. I remember an article on crickinfo about a year or so ago' date=' the writer was asking Yousuf to be sacked as he never really scored when required. Wonder what the writer would be thinking now.[/quote'] yup u got to score runs at the end of day and he is doing it with aplomb

[shailesh]

Re: Pak v WI 3rd test 2 down already..hopefully Lara can get a big one.