jigjig Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 Bc 47 mein kyun alag huye agar friendship hi karni thi.
Sharjah-Harjah Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 4 minutes ago, jigjig said: Bc 47 mein kyun alag huye agar friendship hi karni thi. Jis nai yeh batwara kia, Chura ghopa, aur sab ka kat gaya Acha hota hai united he rehtay toh sala exploit nai hotay. But an bhi waqt hai
jigjig Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 12 minutes ago, Sharjah-Harjah said: Jis nai yeh batwara kia, Chura ghopa, aur sab ka kat gaya Acha hota hai united he rehtay toh sala exploit nai hotay. But an bhi waqt hai Ab waqt gaya. Raaste aapne alag chose kiye hain. Hindu ke saath nahi reh sakte aap. Yeh bhi dekhein https://x.com/ShivAroor/status/1857689429634150905
Sharjah-Harjah Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 29 minutes ago, Throwaib_Chuckter said: Ah we see, not playing Pakistan has resulted in huge losses. BCCI is struggling for revenues, lets start bilaterals again so BCCI officials can afford Atta to feed their famished families. Ye sab chhoray, mudde pe aaye aur kahe ke ICC tourneys me ziyada hissedari nahi milti uss se aap pareshan hai. Bilateral honge to paise hi paise honge, hissedaari bhi ziyada hogi. The issue with some tech companies rising in India, along with a few billionaires, is the growing arrogance and detachment from reality. Statements like “We don’t care about Pakistan,” “Pakistan is irrelevant,” or “Pakistan has nothing to offer” are ironic when games Pakistan loses receive more views and likes than those it wins—all thanks to the “love” from across the border. Bhai, duniya mein ajao! Reality mai ajao Hamari maali halat dekh apni na sulgaaye. Humare jaise Maghroor kaum ke saath cricket na khele to shaayad aap ke liye behtar hai. Aap khud duniyavi chizon pe dhyaan de. Apni maali aur jamhuri haalaat sudhaare. Jawan aur baccho mei mazhabi shiddat pasandi ko rokne ki vaccine lagwaaye. (For the non Urdu speakers) It is better for you if you don't play cricket with arrogant people like us. Focus on the worldly problems impacting your country like poverty and democracy. Vaccinate the youth and children against religious extremism. Don't be jealous of our economic situation. I never said that BCCI or Indian cricket cannot survive without Pakistan. Only a fool would think that. All i said was that Modi government is posturing to get votes. and I am not jealous of India’s economic growth; however it’s nuanced growth. The Human Dev Index, poverty, inequality and education metrics are still pretty bad and marginally better than Pakistan’s, there are some big winners in the Indian economy which paper over the crack. It’s by no means a shared and equal growth. one can only fool people who haven’t studied economics. as for vaccinating, it’s true there are bad apples, but they are kept on sidelines. Pakistan consistently elects non-religious parties to office. Pakistani leaders do not **** talk Hindus to get elected into office. The real extremism is what is happening in India. You are ELECTING an extremist manifesto to office, as evident by statements by your PM calling a significant minority “infiltrators”.. what I was envious of was the secular and democratic India and wished Pakistan was the same. However, today I am glad that I was not born in this India after looking at what has happened with it. You will know in 20 or 30 years what has happened. Even Pakistan grew 8% during Zia and Musharraf regime. Growth is not everything and you will soon find out.
Throwaib_Chuckter Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 12 minutes ago, Sharjah-Harjah said: Acha hota hai united he rehtay toh sala exploit nai hotay. But an bhi waqt hai Thanks, but no thanks. You are a shaistagi waali koum and we are maghroor. The twain should never mix like Na and H20.
Sharjah-Harjah Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 30 minutes ago, jigjig said: BCCI initially approved. Where did you get this from? Your madrasa ? The entire thing was finalized no? 3 months they are waking up. When ICC awarded the tournament years ago, all parties signed on it right
Sharjah-Harjah Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 1 minute ago, Throwaib_Chuckter said: Thanks, but no thanks. You are a shaistagi waali koum and we are maghroor. The twain should never mix like Na and H20. Lolol hahaha sai hai bhai tu theek hai
jf1gp_1 Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 13 minutes ago, Sharjah-Harjah said: The entire thing was finalized no? 3 months they are waking up. When ICC awarded the tournament years ago, all parties signed on it right I am sure Indian agreement would have been conditional.
Suhaan Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 3 hours ago, Sharjah-Harjah said: lol samjh kisi ko fir bhi nahi arahi. Pakistan sai cricket nai khelaingai… kya ukhadliya? Kuch nahi ukhada. Nuksan sirf cricket fans ka hua aur faida politician ka! Paxtan se khelke tumhe paise deke kya terrorists ko fund karna hai? Apni politics tum dekho ham apni,yaha kya kon bol rha tumse koi matlab nhi
jigjig Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 18 minutes ago, Sharjah-Harjah said: The entire thing was finalized no? 3 months they are waking up. When ICC awarded the tournament years ago, all parties signed on it right No it wasn't. India did not sign
Suhaan Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 2 hours ago, Sharjah-Harjah said: If India and Pakistan cricket doesn’t matter, then why do so many Indians tune to watch it. Prove it with your eyeballs. Otherwise you’re just making statements out of your a** this forum cricket fans explodes on India Pakistan games Equally explodes infact more featuring Ind vs Aus Ind vs SL,final is still the most viewed match in history of WC Toh apne ap ko itni importance mat de, paxtani and importance don't get along in the same sentence
jigjig Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 Just now, Suhaan said: Equally explodes infact more featuring Ind vs Aus Ind vs SL,final is still the most viewed match in history of WC Toh apne ap ko itni importance mat de, paxtani and importance don't get along in the same sentence Kahin terrorism karna ho to inki importance hai
Sharjah-Harjah Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 10 minutes ago, jf1gp_1 said: I am sure Indian agreement would have been conditional. Why did BCCI and Indian govt keep quite until 3 months before the tournament. They should have just said no right away when original MOU was signed. It would have avoided the entire drama and controversy. Or is the drama and controversy needed to posture and show “we are tough on terror haven”.
Sharjah-Harjah Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 2 minutes ago, Suhaan said: Equally explodes infact more featuring Ind vs Aus Ind vs SL,final is still the most viewed match in history of WC Toh apne ap ko itni importance mat de, paxtani and importance don't get along in the same sentence You are right about misinformation. It’s India games that are most viewed, but pak vs India is the most viewed games generally speaking. Maybe a few games are viewed more than that. however one cannot say that Indians don’t care about Pakistan India cricket match. That’s not true. In fact it’s the opposite. If Pakistan turns up more, specially in ODIs, it has a path to even more viewership.
Suhaan Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 Just now, Sharjah-Harjah said: You are right about misinformation. It’s India games that are most viewed, but pak vs India is the most viewed games generally speaking. Maybe a few games are viewed more than that. however one cannot say that Indians don’t care about Pakistan India cricket match. That’s not true. In fact it’s the opposite. If Pakistan turns up more, specially in ODIs, it has a path to even more viewership. Yes you have answered it other sides giving India run for their money sets more Indian fans glued than random Indo Pak matches even WC ones
Sharjah-Harjah Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 22 minutes ago, Suhaan said: Paxtan se khelke tumhe paise deke kya terrorists ko fund karna hai? Apni politics tum dekho ham apni,yaha kya kon bol rha tumse koi matlab nhi lol toh sala Pakistan India mai khelay toh terrorism fund nai hota? MCG mai khelay toh fund nai hoga? ICC to fir bhi fund kerta hai Pakistan ko , match kahin bhi ho ICC has offered full payment to Pakistan to host ICc champions trophy hybrid model. If money is the main reason, Pakistan would have accepted it. But the whole r**** Rona is because India will play Pakistan in ICC and ACC event anywhere but Pakistan, takay kuch bol sakay “we are though on terror haven”
Suhaan Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 1 minute ago, Sharjah-Harjah said: lol toh sala Pakistan India mai khelay toh terrorism fund nai hota? MCG mai khelay toh fund nai hoga? ICC to fir bhi fund kerta hai Pakistan ko , match kahin bhi ho ICC has offered full payment to Pakistan to host ICc champions trophy hybrid model. If money is the main reason, Pakistan would have accepted it. But the whole r**** Rona is because India will play Pakistan in ICC and ACC event anywhere but Pakistan, takay kuch bol sakay “we are though on terror haven” Abey Mai bilaterals ke context me keh rha tha
Sharjah-Harjah Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 1 minute ago, Suhaan said: Yes you have answered it other sides giving India run for their money sets more Indian fans glued than random Indo Pak matches even WC ones Don’t mix formats. In T20s, India has lost 2 out of last 4 games against Pakistan, and even the ones it has won, it was very close. its in ODIs, where games have been one sided. in any case, Indians enjoying winning and dominating Pakistan. The viewership of such games has benefited due to one sided nature
Sharjah-Harjah Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 1 minute ago, Suhaan said: Abey Mai bilaterals ke context me keh rha tha Toh ICC match ka paisa fund nai kerta terrorism?
jigjig Posted November 17, 2024 Posted November 17, 2024 14 minutes ago, Sharjah-Harjah said: Why did BCCI and Indian govt keep quite until 3 months before the tournament. They should have just said no right away when original MOU was signed. It would have avoided the entire drama and controversy. Or is the drama and controversy needed to posture and show “we are tough on terror haven”. It has been our stance for years. Why would it change?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now