Lord Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 I so wish we were touring SA next. We would beat them and be undisputed king of the world it isnt that easy,they r the best team in the world atm.beat the aussies in their own backyard n now looking good for a clean sweep.that too after aussies winning the toss every time n batting first
Lord Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 dsr v/s rox here we go ... who r u supporting? anyway nice avatar!:two_thumbs_up:
SachDan Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 it isnt that easy' date='they r the best team in the world atm.beat the aussies in their own backyard n now looking good for a clean sweep.that too after [b']aussies winning the toss every time n batting first So Dhoni winning those tosses had nothing to do with India's victories..right ?? :giggle:
King Tendulkar Posted January 3, 2009 Author Posted January 3, 2009 Nope we are the best. We destroyed the aussies and put them on the mat. Their strength was not only their ability but like all great teams in any sport their collective self belief. We destroyed that self belief and put them on the floor, SA have merley put the finishing blow. We also clearly won last series in oz. Just robbed by umpires. SA have no spinner, a make shift opner and wekanesses in middle order. We will beat the SAs, I have no doubt. In fact they came to India and limped to a draw. We are no 1 in world
Shane Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 So Dhoni winning those tosses had nothing to do with India's victories..right ?? :giggle: Wow ... bang on Dan !!! :hysterical:
Shane Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 who r u supporting? anyway nice avatar!:two_thumbs_up: sitting firmly on the fence ... avvy ... rewind 19 yrs !!!
Lord Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 So Dhoni winning those tosses had nothing to do with India's victories..right ?? :giggle: thats exactly wat i said.luck was with the aussies n they still got thrashed.toss is an imp.factor nowadays
SachDan Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 Nope we are the best. We destroyed the aussies and put them on the mat. Their strength was not only their ability but like all great teams in any sport their collective self belief. We destroyed that self belief and put them on the floor, SA have merley put the finishing blow. We also clearly won last series in oz. Just robbed by umpires. SA have no spinner, a make shift opner and wekanesses in middle order. We will beat the SAs, I have no doubt. In fact they came to India and limped to a draw. We are no 1 in world Good points :two_thumbs_up:
h4te Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 uhm, he sorta looksl like this (minus the makeup):
Shane Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 Good points :two_thumbs_up: So i assume we have a winner !!!
Lord Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 Nope we are the best. We destroyed the aussies and put them on the mat. Their strength was not only their ability but like all great teams in any sport their collective self belief. We destroyed that self belief and put them on the floor, SA have merley put the finishing blow. We also clearly won last series in oz. Just robbed by umpires. SA have no spinner, a make shift opner and wekanesses in middle order. We will beat the SAs, I have no doubt. In fact they came to India and limped to a draw. We are no 1 in world :hysterical:@ 'limped'.they limped so badly that they thrashed us by an innings at ahmedabad n we had to prepare a disgraceful pitch to get even as for the self belief,we destroyed that in 2001 too,but the aussies came back n remained champs.however this time SA didnt let that happen. as for the series in OZ we may have won if not for the umpires but even then it wouldnt be as dominating a win as SA's. and btw,even sehwag is a makeshift opener.and they have a better attack overall
SachDan Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 :hysterical:@ 'limped'.they limped so badly that they thrashed us by an innings at ahmedabad n we had to prepare a disgraceful pitch to get even as for the self belief,we destroyed that in 2001 too,but the aussies came back n remained champs.however this time SA didnt let that happen. as for the series in OZ we may have won if not for the umpires but even then it wouldnt be as dominating a win as SA's. and btw,even sehwag is a makeshift opener.and they have a better attack overall Domaink's post India created the crack in the wall. SA is smashing it down.
Lord Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 ^^smashing down the wall is much more difficult than creating cracks in it.cracks can be sorted.
Ram Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 He didnt look a test-class player. His batting isnt what you would worth of a proper batsman. We dont know about his bowling as yet. The Aussie selectors look confused beyond logic... First they pick a half-fit, out of form all-rounder( Symonds) over a fitter, in form one(Watson). Now, the latter too is injured. They play musical chairs with the spinner's spot. And for a tour of India, they pick a a guy ( Cameron White, who's a nonsense spinner), ahead of a specialist spinner for the first three tests. They pick Hilfenhaus for previous tours and this one and yet an unknown all-rounder is thrust ahead of him. What are they thinking? What are they doing?
King Tendulkar Posted January 3, 2009 Author Posted January 3, 2009 uhm, he sorta looksl like this (minus the makeup): :hysterical:
Chorazin Reto Posted January 4, 2009 Posted January 4, 2009 There are other all rounders, Hopes, Henriques, Doropoulos, they just decided to give Mcdonald a run, but i was as surprised as everyone else they picked a 75% fit Symonds who couldnt bowl really. If you've got an all rounder who cant bowl thats called a batsmen, in which case take a specialist batsmen, D.Hussey, B.Hodge, P.Hughes, C.Rogers, theres plenty of options for specialist batsmen. M.Clarke has saved Australia from embarrassment twice this series toughing it out on day 1 and batting with the tail on day 2(which has also been wagging).
cochise Posted January 4, 2009 Posted January 4, 2009 uhm, he sorta looksl like this (minus the makeup): He was batting like him too.
amits Posted January 5, 2009 Posted January 5, 2009 we would have beaten aus in aus if it hadnt been for bucknor
Chorazin Reto Posted January 5, 2009 Posted January 5, 2009 They like Marsh for ODI's and T20, seems not for Tests, much like Nathan Bracken who you never see outside ODI's and T20.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now