patriot Posted September 21, 2009 Posted September 21, 2009 I think a fair few of the players- the established ones certainly- are quite confident in their own right- Dravid, Yuv, MSD Sehwag even Gambhir. Doubt it will have that kinda effect In fact it should be quite galvanising playing alongside the greatest cricketer ever. And they shouldnt be too reliant on him either I would not have thought, not since at full strength there are a few pretty good ODI batsmen in our set up ...and SRK is the greatest actor ever in the history of world cinema.
Sooda Posted September 21, 2009 Posted September 21, 2009 Yknow in terms of sheer number of fans/followers/people who have heard of him, SRK might well be the greatest actor ever in the history of cinema.
patriot Posted September 21, 2009 Author Posted September 21, 2009 LOL !!! at ^^^^. Lets not even talk about the utter utter legends of the past. Even among his most parallel contemporaries - Murali as a bowler ( really, a bowling Bradman recordwise ) , has achieved more than SRT as a batter. Played a similar talismanic role for the Rakshasas as a bowler that SRT has played as a batter for India. Only he plays for a country 50 times smaller.
patriot Posted September 21, 2009 Author Posted September 21, 2009 Anyways..I don't intend to start another Ramayan here. fanboys..carry on.:D:D:D
Params7 Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 ...and SRK is the greatest actor ever in the history of world cinema. SRK is a great actor no doubt...but c'mon, in the World?? Though I agree Sachin...one cannot imagine how it must be to bowl to or bat alongside a living, playing legend. Sad to see them all retire though one after the other, but I'm going to enjoy CT because this may be the last time we get to see Dravid and Tendulkar together in a big ODI tournament.
Jersey #10 Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 LOL !!! at ^^^^. Lets not even talk about the utter utter legends of the past. Even among his most parallel contemporaries - Murali as a bowler ( really, a bowling Bradman recordwise ) , has achieved more than SRT as a batter. Played a similar talismanic role for the Rakshasas as a bowler that SRT has played as a batter for India. Only he plays for a country 50 times smaller. I can almost see a nub trying to act smart here ^^^.. for once you are comparing a bowler with a batsman while ranking them on the same scale :lol:and on the other side you are talking as if you understand cricket more than any one else out there :haha: btw, If some one said "murali is a bowling bradman" on a stand up comedy stage...it would be the funniest thing ever :haha::haha::haha: get a life and shut the :finger: up loser
Jersey #10 Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 ...and SRK is the greatest actor ever in the history of world cinema. may be not the greatest actor in the history of the world but definitely amongst the most popular actors in the history of the world. If you havent heard, Forbes named SRK in top 50 strongest people in the world only on his sheer fan following power. He was the only actor on the list. now dont tell me that you can analyze such personalities better than Forbes can
Jersey #10 Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 Anyways..I don't intend to start another Ramayan here. fanboys..carry on.:D:D:D btw, if your peanut sized brain can understand this, records and stats is the only way to analyze a player in a long run. You can not say that such and such is better than sachin or lara because they had a few better tournaments than Sachin. and If you have the ability to explain the math with which you rank bowlers and batsmen on the same scale please share your unique knowledge:haha::haha::haha:
patriot Posted September 22, 2009 Author Posted September 22, 2009 btw, if your peanut sized brain can understand this, records and stats is the only way to analyze a player in a long run. You can not say that such and such is better than sachin or lara because they had a few better tournaments than Sachin. and If you have the ability to explain the math with which you rank bowlers and batsmen on the same scale please share your unique knowledge:haha::haha::haha: transparent brain, Learn to read properly. As a bowler - Murali owns more records than SRT as batsman . OK ?
yoda Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 We just now won the compaq cup with him and others contributing and lost a meaningless warm up without him. What is there to discuss other than stfu and enjoy the tournament? :winky:
Guest Hiten. Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 transparent brain, Learn to read properly. As a bowler - Murali owns more records than SRT as batsman . OK ? And as a batsman SRT owns more record than Murali. OK ? Apples and Oranges my friend P.S: Stop derailing all the bloody topics ffs. Mention SRT when the thread is about him. One fineleg was enough for us ICFers
patriot Posted September 22, 2009 Author Posted September 22, 2009 And as a batsman SRT owns more record than Murali. OK ? Apples and Oranges my friend P.S: Stop derailing all the bloody topics ffs. Mention SRT when the thread is about him. One fineleg was enough for us ICFers The argument was wrt to " greatest cricketer of all times" - and that would include bowlers as well.
Params7 Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 may be not the greatest actor in the history of the world but definitely amongst the most popular actors in the history of the world. If you havent heard, Forbes named SRK in top 50 strongest people in the world only on his sheer fan following power. He was the only actor on the list. now dont tell me that you can analyze such personalities better than Forbes can lol dude you're talking to me like I just said he's isn't good. I agree with the FACT that he is, without the a doubt one of the best that has ever graced films on screen...and hell I'll even say he is the best in Hindi cinema (yeah that's me saying SRK > AB), but I just thought saying he's the greatest ever in the World is a bit fanboyish :cantstop: And there's a difference between a fan and a fanboy/girl.
Rajiv Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 Greatest doesn't necessarily mean numbers all the time, it involves lot of personality, respect and ability to carry yourself around. SRT's composure over the years in his game, personal life, critics and dedication is what makes him great. Murali i is big, very big but very small in comparison to Tendulkar Murali carried 30 Million smiles, Tendulkar has 30 times that
patriot Posted September 22, 2009 Author Posted September 22, 2009 Greatest doesn't necessarily mean numbers all the time, it involves lot of personality, respect and ability to carry yourself around. SRT's composure over the years in his game, personal life, critics and dedication is what makes him great. Murali i is big, very big but very small in comparison to Tendulkar Murali carried 30 Million smiles, Tendulkar has 30 times that Agreed 100 %. Murali has shown tremendous character ( to keep performing game after game ) after all those career threatening accusations of chucking. 99 % cricketers would have simply fallen apart multiple times when such accusations are heard every second frickin day by the Western cricketers/media. Add to that him being amazingly humble and composed. You can't fault him for the fact that he represents a much much smaller country - for thats totally out of his hands.
Anakin Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 Agreed 100 %. Murali has shown tremendous character ( to keep performing game after game ) after all those career threatening accusations of chucking. 99 % cricketers would have simply fallen apart multiple times when such accusations are heard every second frickin day by the Western cricketers/media. Add to that him being amazingly humble and composed. You can't fault him for the fact that he represents a much much smaller country - for thats totally out of his hands. The fact is he does chuck
Jersey #10 Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 transparent brain, Learn to read properly. As a bowler - Murali owns more records than SRT as batsman . OK ? you do realize that Sachin holds almost 70 records as a batsman while Muralitharan holds less than 15 right? If Murali has highest wickets in both tests and ODIs then sachin has highest runs in both formats. I dont see how you can rank these two on one scale...I seriously think that you need to stop acting smart because you are making a fool out of your own self. Please get real...:two_thumbs_up: If you had compared Murali with warnie and sachin with Lara...It would be a healthy discussion but right now its just a waste of time trying to explain sh1t to a 7 year old kid on the internet.
punjabi_khota Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 transparent brain, Learn to read properly. As a bowler - Murali owns more records than SRT as batsman . OK ? Murali averages 36 against OZ. Murali averages 70 in OZ. Murali averages 30 against India. Murali averages 40 in India. Not the hallmarks of the greatest cricketer ever. Especially given the fact that OZ and India have been the 2 leading test playing teams during his career. He has done well against SA among the top teams. He is not even the greatest bowler of his generation. I would put McGrath, Akram ahead of him and maybe Warne too.
Jersey #10 Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 Agreed 100 %. Murali has shown tremendous character ( to keep performing game after game ) after all those career threatening accusations of chucking. 99 % cricketers would have simply fallen apart multiple times when such accusations are heard every second frickin day by the Western cricketers/media. Add to that him being amazingly humble and composed. You can't fault him for the fact that he represents a much much smaller country - for thats totally out of his hands. Please be careful when you compare countries now. At this level of the legendary comparision such as Sachin and Murali, they dont only have fans in SL and India but all over the world. They are not only cricketers representing their own countries but now they have transformed into much bigger icons for the whole world to enjoy their talent. It would be unfair to say that one or the other have bigger fan base because every cricket lover would appreciate their contribution by now. They are both big people in cricket and we all appreciate it but my concern is that you can not compare the two. both have different roles to perform and have performed very well.
Jersey #10 Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 lol dude you're talking to me like I just said he's isn't good. I agree with the FACT that he is' date=' without the a doubt one of the best that has ever graced films on screen...and hell I'll even say he is the best in Hindi cinema (yeah that's me saying SRK > AB), but I just thought saying he's the greatest ever in the World is a bit fanboyish :cantstop: And there's a difference between a fan and a fanboy/girl.[/quote'] I don't remember quoting you dude...any ways...thanks for quoting me...good to know your point of view..:two_thumbs_up:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now