Little_Master Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 Here is my choice 1. Sehwag 2. gambhir 3. Sachin 4. Yuvi 5. Dhoni 6. Raina 7. Kartik (Badly missing irfaan pathan...would have him in this spot) 8. Bajji 9. PK 10. Nehra 11. Ishant Sehwag, yuvi and raina combined together bowl close to 10 overs whether or not we have 5 specialist bowlers..so 4 specialist (sorry for considering bajji a specialist spinner inspite of his pathetic performace:giggle:) bowlers are good enough. The key lies in the batting line order and i hope dhoni does'nt screw it by sending a rookie like kartik or kohli at no 3 or 4. Irrespective of the playing 11, if sehwag, gambhir, sachin, yuvi, dhoni and raina are playing, then they need to occupy the first 6 slots. We will have a good chance of chasing a good total or posting a good total. Go india go!!!!B-> Link to comment
Little_Master Posted November 5, 2009 Author Share Posted November 5, 2009 and i almost thought...no one wanted to discuss...10+ views and no replies:icflove: Link to comment
SachDan Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 Didn't BCCI release Karthik to play for TN in Ranji? Like it or not Sachin will continue to open. Link to comment
The Dark Horse Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 Here is my choice 1. Sehwag 2. gambhir 3. Sachin 4. Yuvi 5. Dhoni 6. Raina 7. Kartik (Badly missing irfaan pathan...would have him in this spot) 8. Bajji 9. PK 10. Nehra 11. Ishant Sehwag, yuvi and raina combined together bowl close to 10 overs whether or not we have 5 specialist bowlers..so 4 specialist (sorry for considering bajji a specialist spinner inspite of his pathetic performace:giggle:) bowlers are good enough. The key lies in the batting line order and i hope dhoni does'nt screw it by sending a rookie like kartik or kohli at no 3 or 4. Irrespective of the playing 11, if sehwag, gambhir, sachin, yuvi, dhoni and raina are playing, then they need to occupy the first 6 slots. We will have a good chance of chasing a good total or posting a good total. Go india go!!!!B-> mmm only 4 bowlers with an out of form Bhajji, Ishant? And Kartik is playing the Ranji against railways. Link to comment
davidcooper Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 and i almost thought...no one wanted to discuss...10+ views and no replies:icflove: patience :winky: Link to comment
davidcooper Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 mmm only 4 bowlers with an out of form Bhajji, Ishant? And Kartik is playing the Ranji against railways. the 5th bowler jadeja bowled only 2 overs last game:giggle: Link to comment
Temujin Khaghan Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 i think the OP is a classic case of some indian fans' fascination with batsmen and strokeplayers. Going in with only 4 bowlers, without zak and an out of form ishanth is crazy. Why is it that people prefer to see karthik score 20 quick runs in the end rather than jadeja (no supporter of his) bowl a full quota of 10 decent overs and even take a couple of wickets? i think if jadeja is so hated, then the team should give a spot to mishra. Bowlers win more matches than batsmen do. I think the present batting order that we have is more than sifficient. Yeah well... they may not click all the time, but that doent mean we concentrate more on the batsmen all the time... Link to comment
Little_Master Posted November 5, 2009 Author Share Posted November 5, 2009 i think the OP is a classic case of some indian fans' fascination with batsmen and strokeplayers. Going in with only 4 bowlers' date=' without zak and an out of form ishanth is crazy. Why is it that people prefer to see karthik score 20 quick runs in the end rather than jadeja (no supporter of his) bowl a full quota of 10 decent overs and even take a couple of wickets? i think if jadeja is so hated, then the team should give a spot to mishra. Bowlers win more matches than batsmen do. I think the present batting order that we have is more than sifficient. Yeah well... they may not click all the time, but that doent mean we concentrate more on the batsmen all the time...[/quote'] sorry...but i never considered india to have any bowling strength ever...not today...not 20 years ago when i started watching cricket seriously. The way i see it..irrespective of whether we have 3 or 4 or 5 bowlers...all but one are going to have a miserable day and it is only our batsmen that come to our rescue most of the times. and yeah...we terribly miss zak. Link to comment
davidcooper Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 i think the OP is a classic case of some indian fans' fascination with batsmen and strokeplayers. Going in with only 4 bowlers' date=' without zak and an out of form ishanth is crazy. Why is it that people prefer to see karthik score 20 quick runs in the end rather than jadeja (no supporter of his) bowl a full quota of 10 decent overs and even take a couple of wickets? i think if jadeja is so hated, then the team should give a spot to mishra. Bowlers win more matches than batsmen do. I think the present batting order that we have is more than sifficient. Yeah well... they may not click all the time, but that doent mean we concentrate more on the batsmen all the time...[/quote'] no you are worng, ODIs are batsmen friendly and hence 7 batsmen is essential, greg chappal encouraged 5 bowlers and it was disastrous by the way ur 5th bowler jadeja bowled only 2 overs last game :giggle: Link to comment
The Dark Horse Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 the 5th bowler jadeja bowled only 2 overs last game:giggle: Thats not his fault:giggle: I remember times when RP, Ishant etc bowling lesser overs than Yuvi. Link to comment
Temujin Khaghan Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 sorry...but i never considered india to have any bowling strength ever...not today...not 20 years ago when i started watching cricket seriously. The way i see it..irrespective of whether we have 3 or 4 or 5 bowlers...all but one are going to have a miserable day and it is only our batsmen that come to our rescue most of the times. and yeah...we terribly miss zak. so u would rather chase 320 with 7 batsmen (the 7th dwarf being dinesh karthik) rather than chase 280 with 6 batsmen and a meaty tail? anyway today our bowlers will get thrashed... even after the aus batting is depleted coz hyderabad pitch is a batting pitch. Link to comment
Temujin Khaghan Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 no you are worng, ODIs are batsmen friendly and hence 7 batsmen is essential, greg chappal encouraged 5 bowlers and it was disastrous by the way ur 5th bowler jadeja bowled only 2 overs last game :giggle: 5th bowler jadeja is the leading wicket taker of the tourny Most wickets Player Mat Overs Mdns Runs Wkts BBI Ave Econ SR 4 5 RA Jadeja (India) 4 31.3 1 142 6 3/35 23.66 4.50 31.5 0 0 A Nehra (India) 4 34.0 0 186 6 3/37 31.00 5.47 34.0 0 0 MG Johnson (Aust) 4 38.2 2 251 6 3/75 41.83 6.54 38.3 0 0 SR Watson (Aust) 4 22.4 1 146 5 3/29 29.20 6.44 27.2 0 0 I Sharma (India) 4 28.0 0 150 5 3/50 30.00 5.35 33.6 0 0 and ****ing jadeja bowled more overs than ishath sharma "the pace spearhead" what do you say to this? i am not saying that jadeja should walk in to the team. all iam saying is that if you are taking out jadeja then bring in a bowler rather than karthik. another possible argument will be to make karthik our no7 batsman and keeper and ask yuvraj/raina and dhoni to share the 5th bowler quota... but u wont get wickets with them... Link to comment
Temujin Khaghan Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 ^^ and look at jadeja's ****ing average - its 23.66. lol. maybe even mishra may not have performed this well. Link to comment
ViruRulez Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 I completely agree with the batting order and that is the one I have been suggesting for long. But I feel Jadeja might be included once again for his bowling. If included he should be sent after Bhajji and PK to bat. And I would also like either Tyagi or Munaf being given a chance in place of Ishant in this match. Link to comment
someone Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 I completely agree with the batting order and that is the one I have been suggesting for long. But I feel Jadeja might be included once again for his bowling. If included he should be sent after Bhajji and PK to bat. And I would also like either Tyagi or Munaf being given a chance in place of Ishant in this match. Yep The batter Bhajji > The batter Jadeja(but he can defend better) The bowler Jadeja>The bowler Jadeja I know which one I would pick Link to comment
davidcooper Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 :hysterical::hysterical: at OP jadeja went at 8.80 and india has one less batsman in a big chase Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now