vvvslaxman Posted December 7, 2009 Posted December 7, 2009 http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;opposition=2;orderby=fow_score;partnership_wicketmin1=7;partnership_wicketval1=partnership_wicket;spanmax1=07+Dec+2009;spanmin1=07+Dec+2006;spanval1=span;template=results;type=fow;view=innings In the last 3 years Australia has been hurt by tail ender partnerships a lot. We thought we were not the best in finishing off the tail. There is someone who has lost lot of matches due to tail resistance. Some times tail managed to earn draws as well Zak/Bhajji once. Panesar/Anderson once. RED BOX means Australia lost in that match
cowboysfan Posted December 7, 2009 Posted December 7, 2009 they allowed monty and anderson to play for more than an hour and save a test match.I think they lack a top quality spinner who can just run through the tail.
vvvslaxman Posted December 7, 2009 Author Posted December 7, 2009 It is a lesson for everyone. These days lot of tailenders have started batting well. Teams cannot afford to relax anymore after getting through the top and middle order.
Don Sharma Posted December 7, 2009 Posted December 7, 2009 I think Brett Lee missed a good number of those highlighted matches. He was quite lethal when it comes to cleaning up the tail.
Karan114 Posted December 7, 2009 Posted December 7, 2009 I think Brett Lee missed a good number of those highlighted matches. He was quite lethal when it comes to cleaning up the tail. Not the Indian ones - Harbhajan, Kumble, Zak all scored plenty of runs against him in the two Aus series last year.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now