Block hole Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 Yes, because both sides have such bad batsmen. That's my honest opinion, they're useless. Napier curator Phil Stoyanoff on why he thought the pitch would produce a result in the third Test. Stephen Hill, NZC's public affairs manager, said he hoped the comments would be used "in context and with restraint". :hysterical:
Block hole Posted December 11, 2009 Author Posted December 11, 2009 Our Curator's never enjoy that same Luxury .
vvvslaxman Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 Just because two teams have crappy batting line up they say the pitch is good.
champ Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 this was same ground last time NZ made 600+ against India .. they should do well atleast here i think ..
DomainK Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
king2be98 Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 Well will be interesting to see what the outcome is, historically Napier has been a ground for draws. 75% of the test matches there have been draws, I can't see that happening, not with 2 abysmal batting line ups.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now