Block hole Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Yes, because both sides have such bad batsmen. That's my honest opinion, they're useless. Napier curator Phil Stoyanoff on why he thought the pitch would produce a result in the third Test. Stephen Hill, NZC's public affairs manager, said he hoped the comments would be used "in context and with restraint". :hysterical: Link to comment
Block hole Posted December 11, 2009 Author Share Posted December 11, 2009 Our Curator's never enjoy that same Luxury . Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Just because two teams have crappy batting line up they say the pitch is good. Link to comment
champ Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 this was same ground last time NZ made 600+ against India .. they should do well atleast here i think .. Link to comment
Sachinism Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 LMAO what a comment to make Link to comment
DomainK Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
king2be98 Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Well will be interesting to see what the outcome is, historically Napier has been a ground for draws. 75% of the test matches there have been draws, I can't see that happening, not with 2 abysmal batting line ups. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now