ViruRulez Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 Oz for sure.. I especially like their bowing backup too .. the number of quality bowlers from Australia never seem to end Link to comment
Bradman99 Posted February 20, 2010 Author Share Posted February 20, 2010 I think Australia for one dayers definately, but in tests it is up for debate. Link to comment
Chandan Posted February 20, 2010 Share Posted February 20, 2010 did u manage to catch the series in SA? yes they lost a closely fought ashes........ and even mcwarne and company could only win them one series in 40 years in India......so lets not bring India. they have a very good pace attack....the fastest in the world at the moment......and Hauritz isnt a bad bowler Oh yes. I saw the three test fully. Hilfenhaus was the best of the lot, according to me. MJ, has a bit of unknown factor about him where despite bowling all those wide deliveries, he manages to take wickets. Siddle is decent and Bollinger now looks class. But they still have not proven themselves to be called the best. They couldn't dislodge the Windies in one of the tests. In the Ashes, England clearly had a better attack. Mcwarne finally won the test series, didn't they? They had almost won the 2001 series too. So there is no comparison. And fastest doesn't mean best, unless you are confusing. I think Australia for one dayers definately' date=' but in tests it is up for debate.[/quote'] Agree completely. Link to comment
The Outsider Posted February 21, 2010 Share Posted February 21, 2010 If I were to pick a World XI 4-man bowling line-up from all the bowlers today, then this would be my pick: Dale Steyn Mohd Asif Doug Bollinger M Muralitharan This really cracked me up! :hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
Deleted_User_1 Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 Not Pak since all of them are cheats of the highest order. Link to comment
punjabi_khota Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 Oz bowling is quite avg really . MJ is rubbish , Siddle & Bollinger decent SA pace attack is easily the best & harris is decent imo WI have a pretty good attack in Taylor , Roach , Edwards , Dave Mohammad & Bravo I would take WI if Edwards is fit ! :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: What are you smoking man ? Wi attack is full of pacers who know not what accuracy is. Theirs is one attack where everyone averages 35+. It sucks major balls and has fewer good days than the Pakis, which is saying something. If you had 3 agarkar clones, it would be better than WI pace attack. Roach is too inexperienced to be judged. Link to comment
Karan114 Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 I think Australia for one dayers definately' date=' but in tests it is up for debate.[/quote'] Agree with this - I can't really make a case for any one of the Test attacks being dominant. Link to comment
Deleted_User_1 Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 I think the duo of Bharat Arun and Dodda Ganesh is the best the world has seen..... Link to comment
Jai Ho Posted February 22, 2010 Share Posted February 22, 2010 all I can say is that Indian attack is very underrated. Link to comment
virufan Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 No' date=' but Shoaib Akhtar is.[/quote'] But Shoaib Akhtar is not in the playing XI. How can he be better than Steyn? :hysterical: Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now