Bradman99 Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 Which international team do you think has the best bowling line up ? Be it, in one dayers or test matches.. or both ?
Serani Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 Australia has the best resources, anyone they call up seems to be able to bowl 90MPH+, havent got too much in the way of spinners though. They are defo the best One Day bowling attack, in tests its a bit too one dimensional.
cochise_2.0 Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 Which international team do you think has the best bowling line up ? Be it, in one dayers or test matches.. or both ? Oz.
IKnowU Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 Oz bowlers are lucky they had windies and padosi's gifting their wickets every couple of overs. Tell me one player out of both those teams that made Oz work for his wicket????? Oz bowlers go through recylcling stage as soon as they drop their form. Thats why you never see the bad side of their bowling since someone else is performing.
vvvslaxman Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 I agree OZ has good bowling line up and good bench strength. Other teams depend on 1 or 2 key bowlers.
Ranjha Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 OZ...who else? and for any delusional pakis reading this thread, your bowling attack is worse than ours.
Malcolm Merlyn Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 australia.....though Hauritz wont harm most indians on most days....he is good enough for most other teams....and their express bowling attack is good enough on most days.
Chandan Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 australia.....though Hauritz wont harm most indians on most days....he is good enough for most other teams....and their express bowling attack is good enough on most days. But didn't they lose the Ashes just few months back to a not so dominant England? Just by winning two home series can't make them the best in tests, though they have a terrific attack for one dayers.
Malcolm Merlyn Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 But didn't they lose the Ashes just few months back to a not so dominant England? Just by winning two home series can't make them the best in tests' date=' though they have a terrific attack for one dayers.[/quote'] as just one series loss doesnt make them bad.....
Pak_Forever Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 Australia on the top then Pakistan and SA.
Chandan Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 as just one series loss doesnt make them bad..... They were already bad, having lost a test a test series badly in India, and a series at home (perhaps after 20 years or so) just the previous year. So how were they good? And they didn't prove to have improved a great deal after losing ashes in England where even the much maligned India bowlers had won a series. So how were they good in tests?
Dhondy Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 Australia on the top then Pakistanand SA. :hysterical::hysterical:
Malcolm Merlyn Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 Australia on the top then Pakistan and SA. what have they won????? okay leave that how many of them avg under 30 in tests????or have taken 100 wickets? so neither do thay have past performance nor present.....and dont give me the they have talent ****.....SA and england have better attacks....... and if winning is considered India beats them at that as well..... Pakistan and their overrated attack.....
Malcolm Merlyn Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 They were already bad, having lost a test a test series badly in India, and a series at home (perhaps after 20 years or so) just the previous year. So how were they good? And they didn't prove to have improved a great deal after losing ashes in England where even the much maligned India bowlers had won a series. So how were they good in tests? did u manage to catch the series in SA? yes they lost a closely fought ashes........ and even mcwarne and company could only win them one series in 40 years in India......so lets not bring India. they have a very good pace attack....the fastest in the world at the moment......and Hauritz isnt a bad bowler
gult Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 Australia on the top then Pakistan and SA. You mean, that druggie asif is better than dale steyn?? :omg:
falconhawk Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 You mean' date=' that druggie asif is better than dale steyn?? :omg:[/quote'] No, but Shoaib Akhtar is.
vvvslaxman Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 No' date=' but Shoaib Akhtar is.[/quote'] oh lifebuoy Akthar i mean lipoboy
Texan Posted February 19, 2010 Posted February 19, 2010 No team can currently claim to have the "best" bowling line-up. Aus and SA have good quicks, but not such a great spinner. SL and Eng have a good spinner each, but not that good pace bowlers. India have 2 good bowlers in Bhajji and Zaheer, but the rest are ordinary. Pak have a good seamer in Mohd Asif, but the rest are average. NZ have decent bowlers, but without Bond, they lack a match-winner.
Texan Posted February 20, 2010 Posted February 20, 2010 If I were to pick a World XI 4-man bowling line-up from all the bowlers today, then this would be my pick: Dale Steyn Mohd Asif Doug Bollinger M Muralitharan
jusarrived Posted February 20, 2010 Posted February 20, 2010 Oz bowling is quite avg really . MJ is rubbish , Siddle & Bollinger decent SA pace attack is easily the best & harris is decent imo WI have a pretty good attack in Taylor , Roach , Edwards , Dave Mohammad & Bravo I would take WI if Edwards is fit !
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now