Tendulkar planning to play way beyond 2011 .....

[Lord]

If only winning a World Cup could have been done single handedly' date=' SRT would have won 2 World Cups in his last 5 attempts. Twice he has been the highest scorer in World Cups (1996 and 2006) outperforming every other batsman in those tournaments. I wish Ganguly elected to bat first after winning the toss in the 2003 WC Finals, things could have been so different.[/quote'] yeah that was stupidity.Ponting couldnt believe his luck n was smiling wen Ganguly said he'd bowl:((

[Jersey #10]

Surprised you haven't said he should quit ODIs as well and just return to playing your beloved T20' date=' eh?[/quote'] I would suggest that he play Test matches as well had there been test wc :haha::haha::haha::haha::haha: but then if they did...half the games would get no results after 5 days of boring play. At the same time the players would not be compensated for 5 days of work as much as they would get for 3 hours or 6 hours of work in the other two formats:haha: Having said that, it would be worthless to broadcast such lame tournaments so Neo cricket would go bankrupt or close down before that. LAME! No wonder why we had to opt for two other formats because that lame format was going nowhere. Soccer didn't have to make huge changes or come up with different formats to keep their game alive because their game was not Lame! The cricket experts knew that Test cricket was not meant to go on for a long time on it own hence the two new formats. You can make up names for ODIs and T20s and laugh at them but at the end of the day these two formats are the real face of cricket for billions of cricket fans. :finger: I would be more than happy to see SRT play T20 wc but he won't.

[Jersey #10]

Let's hope that we can save the half dead version of cricket. I mean every one knows that it's dying and that's why all the experts and 1% of the fans are talking about saving it.