Jump to content

A surprising fact - Cambridge (and Episcopal Divinity School) admits morons like me


Recommended Posts

Posted
none of those were dodgy pitches in the first two the windies batting was crap and in the third it was England at fault and the last one was just a low scoring match. I doubt you watched any of them or attended any of these games
And SA batting was not crap at Kanpur test :hysterical::giggle::haha: Did you attend Ind-SA match at Kanpur ?
Posted
Want to use any more smilies mate?
So this pie chucker is your spinning hope. And Harbhajan is ranked low because he played very few test last year. And Swann played 5 in Ashes and averaged 40 :hysterical::haha::giggle:
Posted
So this pie chucker is your spinning hope. And Harbhajan is ranked low because he played very few test last year. And Swann played 5 in Ashes and averaged 40 :hysterical::haha::giggle:
By any chance can you use your favorite programme ever statsguru and find out for me Harbhajans stats against teams that play spin best [aka asian teams] thats Pak, SL and Bangladesh. Satyam any reason you not getting back to me on this?
Posted
Want to use any more smilies mate?
If you ignore the emoticons, he has a very valid stat. I would like to know your comment on that, given that he's the best Off Spinner in the world by your admission.
Posted
yes satyam - the only one that is disappointing is the India one. In fact for a spinner on English seamers and in SA thats very good. BTW Harbhajan outside of India has an average of 37!!! and excepting the 2001 fluke against the aussies 35
C'mon. If that was a fluke, is Swann bowling the fluke of his life?
Posted
If you ignore the emoticons' date=' he has a very valid stat. I would like to know your comment on that, given that he's the best Off Spinner in the world by your admission.[/quote'] Its not by my admission though, its by the ICC and many people that watch cricket, I seem to recall a thread praising Swann on ICF not too long ago.
Posted
yes satyam - the only one that is disappointing is the India one. In fact for a spinner on English seamers and in SA thats very good. BTW Harbhajan outside of India has an average of 37!!! and excepting the 2001 fluke against the aussies 35
That fluke was better than Botham in 1981 Ashes and Flintoff at 2005 ashes. And no we haven't given Harbhajan SIR title yet and MBE :haha::hysterical::cantstop: So you consider 40 average in Ashes to be a good one . :giggle::hysterical::haha:
Posted
Afridi >>>> Botham >>>>>> any Indian.
Anyone who disagrees with this statement is indirectly saying that they want perform the action in h4te's title to Shoaib Akhtar.
Posted
yes satyam - the only one that is disappointing is the India one. In fact for a spinner on English seamers and in SA thats very good. BTW Harbhajan outside of India has an average of 37!!! and excepting the 2001 fluke against the aussies 35
So, you want to manipulate stats to suit your stance? Don't answer, it is a rhetorical question. :desiwoman:
Posted
So, you want to manipulate stats to suit your stance? Don't answer, it is a rhetorical question. :desiwoman:
:hysterical: Azaarimanga, were you not taught at your "well rounded" educational (and stunning university) system how to perform a statistical analysis ?
×
×
  • Create New...