Does England Have Any Chance?

[Serani]

To add to english woes is the bouncy wicket at Kensington Oval.Pace trinity of Oz will batter the english batting.

Our South African top 3 certainly dont mind pace unlike the Indians.

[Sachinism]

Come on you England!!!!

[jusarrived]

I told you so , deservingly Eng win

[jhakati]

:hysterical:

[Dark Warrior]

England - 60 Australia - 40 :D :D

[Serani]

My tactic of betting icf$ on the teams I want to lose has worked spectacularly, however I am now broke.

[SRT195]

atleast 1 prediction came good ... 1 sided final:hysterical:

[Zelig]

I think England will bend over meekly in the way only Poms can.

no chance at all ... Aussies r just too good ... will be another 1 sided final:hitler:

No.

++

Dont think so. No English fast bowler is a proven resource as Nannes or even Tait in the short history of this format. England does not have the same batting depth as Australia. In short, England have the edge in the spin department but Aussies are better in every other respect.

absolutely not ' date='An english team playing at its peak cant beat this aussie team in t20.[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

Some of the comments are hilarious:cantstop: You could be right, England might fold like a pack of cards but they have scored more runs than any other team in the first six overs(avg:50) and it's not right to just write them off:headshake:

:wizard:

[Ranjha]

England surprised me...well done.

[saneindian]

Expect Lumb' date=' [b']the sweater guy and KP to attack the Aussie pace trio with gutso. If Akmal and Butt can hit this attack for 191, poms can do only better. ABout time too when the inventors of this game won some ICC tournament.

:two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up:

[Bradman99]

To say a side has no chance against another side in 20/20's is silly.