Sid Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 If you go past warner and watson,then you have david hussey and cameron white taking the game away and now you the other hussey showing what a great cricketer he is,then brad haddin and mitchell johnson can hit any bowler out of the ground.with the exception of clarke all of their batsmen are match winners,who can clear any ground with ease. and the worst thing for england is that bad day for aussie bowlers has gone and i dont see their pace trio having another bad day but there is still a question marki about steven smith but he has also delivered in most matches! all in all i expect a hammering for england in the finals,aussies just looking too good for rest of the world:hatsoff: but one good thing two best teams are in the finals but aussies too good!
punjabi_khota Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 I think England will bend over meekly in the way only Poms can.
SRT195 Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 no chance at all ... Aussies r just too good ... will be another 1 sided final:hitler: having said that i hope Poms beat the Aussies or at least take it to the final over & not meekly surrender
Clarke Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 I think England will bend over meekly in the way only Poms can. ++
Sid Posted May 14, 2010 Author Posted May 14, 2010 so most of you also thinking of a englisg surrender
jusarrived Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 I predict an England win , been my favs for the tournament
DomainK Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 Australia will win. I will support England though. High time the inventors of the game won something. Poor chaps.
saneindian Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 Expect Lumb, the sweater guy and KP to attack the Aussie pace trio with gutso. If Akmal and Butt can hit this attack for 191, poms can do only better. ABout time too when the inventors of this game won some ICC tournament.
nballa Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 ashes on steroids. They better prepare diced lion for breakfast. eng at its best vs aus at its best.
kabira Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 England have got their tactics spot on for every game so far. I think they have been better tactic wise. If you compare two sides Both have inform Openers Peterson v/s White Captains out of form M Hussey v/s Morgan D. Hussey v/s Luke Wright Decent Spinners Australia are pace heavy. that can go against them if they have off day like they had today. All in all, it will be battle of the nerves. One who is willing to risk, will win.
Watson87 Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 Aussie Aussie Aussie Oi Oi Oi, puck the Poms, well guys look at it this way, if the Poms win we can never pick on them, now it's funny when we say wow they invented cricket and never won a major tournament, what pathetic losers, with England winning it, it stops, do we all want it to end here?
Watson87 Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 England have got their tactics spot on for every game so far. I think they have been better tactic wise. If you compare two sides Both have inform Openers Peterson v/s White Captains out of form M Hussey v/s Morgan D. Hussey v/s Luke Wright Decent Spinners Australia are pace heavy. that can go against them if they have off day like they had today. All in all, it will be battle of the nerves. One who is willing to risk, will win. David Hussey is way better and also a much powerful hitter than Luke Wright
jusarrived Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 some of you are not giving Eng enough credit .Their batting is very balanced & bowling has more variations than ozs .
Sid Posted May 14, 2010 Author Posted May 14, 2010 David Hussey is way better and also a much powerful hitter than Luke Wright ya david hussey is too good to be compared to a average player like wright
Clarke Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 some of you are not giving Eng enough credit .Their batting is very balanced & bowling has more variations than ozs . Dont think so. No English fast bowler is a proven resource as Nannes or even Tait in the short history of this format. England does not have the same batting depth as Australia. In short, England have the edge in the spin department but Aussies are better in every other respect.
Sid Posted May 14, 2010 Author Posted May 14, 2010 Dont think so. No English fast bowler is a proven resource as Nannes or even Tait in the short history of this format. England does not have the same batting depth as Australia. In short, England have the edge in the spin department but Aussies are better in every other respect. well they pwned pakistani spinners very easily and when it comes to bowling spin aussieswant most of the damage to be done by pacers and also english pace attack will be tested severly and i dont see them doing anything about it
hari504504 Posted May 15, 2010 Posted May 15, 2010 I think England will win this... It is about time they won an ICC tournament and tomorrow is going to be the great day
Pak_Forever Posted May 15, 2010 Posted May 15, 2010 Very much doubt it. Australianism will be too much to deal with.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now