UmarAkmal Posted June 16, 2010 Posted June 16, 2010 WASHINGTON: The Afghan Taliban are denying a report that it receives funding, training and protection from Pakistan's ISI intelligence agency, a US monitoring group said Tuesday http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/world/16-afghan+taliban+denies+link+to+pakistan+isi+report-hs-04 This group of Talibans are liars and obviously cannot be trusted by you know who :cantstop:
Clarke Posted June 16, 2010 Posted June 16, 2010 okay, so the report "was concocted by the London School of Economics to “protect” American and British interests in the country", can u please throw the Brits and Americans out of the land of the pure since they are primarily destroying ur country. That would be one bold move :woot:
yoda Posted June 16, 2010 Posted June 16, 2010 That clears them and the ISI. What else do you expect other than the whole truth and nothing but truth out of a terrorist organization regarding their underhand dealings with an Intelligence agency?
Rajiv Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 WASHINGTON: The Afghan Taliban are denying a report that it receives funding' date= training and protection from Pakistan's ISI intelligence agency, a US monitoring group said Tuesday http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/world/16-afghan+taliban+denies+link+to+pakistan+isi+report-hs-04 This group of Talibans are liars and obviously cannot be trusted by you know who :cantstop: I am with you, ignore these stupid Indians. I will always trust the Talib who are liberal on women rights with full support ( all in black from top to toe ). non-muslims and freedom of speech in the language best coded by pigeons The 2 inch "not touch ground" salwar with trimmed beard and guns in their hand is true democracy Part 2: How jeans wearing paks love them - for next time
Desi Cartman Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 I think the people who came up with the theory are Zionist ( arent they all Zionist, I mean all non-muslims ?) They all deserve 300 lashes :orderorder:
hari504504 Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 What else would they do ??...admit ISI links so that US freezes Pak hand-outs..which means Talib would lose their source of funding indirectly...yeah that makes a lot of sense to do :haha:
Pioneer Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 Interviews with Afghan Taliban suggested that the ISI was helping them- "OMG that's so true!" Afghan Taliban deny any ISI link- "OMG terrorists, they are just lying!" Make up your mind
Pioneer Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 We didn't need an LSE report to confirm what's an open secret. ISI was the conduit through which CIA funneled money to the then Mujahiddins. Now here's a homework for you : What's the Paki strategy for "strategic depth" all about? Why are you talking about the Soviet invasion? It's a completely different scenario with Frankenstein now biting our own ass.
King Tendulkar Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 Why are you talking about the Soviet invasion? It's a completely different scenario with Frankenstein now biting our own ass. OMG:omg: Do we finally have a pak admitting the open secret!!! That they pakistan conducted state sponsored terrorists against India and that these jihaids have come back to Frankenstein pak itself???
achilles Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 OMG:omg: Do we finally have a pak admitting the open secret!!! That they pakistan conducted state sponsored terrorists against India and that these jihaids have come back to Frankenstein pak itself??? Pioneer bhai's reply will be similar to the ones the "experts" from Pakistan give in their debates - "I am not a spokesperson for the Government of Pakistan".
Clarke Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 Interviews with Afghan Taliban suggested that the ISI was helping them- "OMG that's so true!" Afghan Taliban deny any ISI link- "OMG terrorists, they are just lying!" Make up your mind Applies to u as well doesnt it .. u choose to ignore the first claim and will stand by the second. The same goes with Kasab's statements; a terrorist caught red handed fighting the 'holy war' against India gave out his history initially and in between the trials started the story that he was wrongly accused and had come to Mumbai to be a bollywood hero. You can thus complain, hey u believed him earlier but u dont believe him now .. he's no perfect human to speak the truth and nothing but the truth and the prevailing circumstances and evidence allow us to judge whats true and whats not. Makes sense ?
achilles Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 Applies to u as well doesnt it .. u choose to ignore the first claim and will stand by the second. The same goes with Kasab's statements; a terrorist caught red handed fighting the 'holy war' against India gave out his history initially and in between the trials started the story that he was wrongly accused and had come to Mumbai to be a bollywood hero. You can thus complain, hey u believed him earlier but u dont believe him now .. he's no perfect human to speak the truth and nothing but the truth and the prevailing circumstances and evidence allow us to judge whats true and whats not. Makes sense ? I still can't believe Kasab actually acted that dumb :hehe:
Rajiv Posted June 17, 2010 Posted June 17, 2010 Denying the act of terrorism by Pakistanis is like Clinton denying the Monica Act
Recommended Posts