asterix Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 This Ranking is FIXED by Reliance Mobile.. :hitler:
Clarke Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 When England beat pak 4-0 could they be no 1? :finger: http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/match_zone/test_predictor.php England gets to 114 after 4-0 win.
yoda Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 don't you guys know that any rating system which has India on top is bogus?
Serani Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 :finger: http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/match_zone/test_predictor.php England gets to 114 after 4-0 win. SO when England beat pak 4-0 and Aus 5-0 they might just scrape to number 1.
kabira Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 When England beat pak 4-0 could they be no 1? do you understand the rankings?? Pakistan is lowly team, winning wont gain much, losing any of the test match will hamper England, Even draws won't be good.
Serani Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 do you understand the rankings?? Pakistan is lowly team, winning wont gain much, losing any of the test match will hamper England, Even draws won't be good. Yes I understand them, just dont pay any notice to them. I just want England to get to number 1 so I can start calling them "TEAM ENGLAND"
Serani Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 Realistically speaking Indias reign at number 1 will probably last until they have a tour to Sa/Aus whenever that may be. Then SA will be the number 1 ranked team therefore due to the simple fact we drew with SA in SA we know deep down England are the true number 1 team. simple logic B->
kabira Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 if you want a simple logic, you don't deserve number 1. you were beaten by India, home and away so keep dreaming.
Clarke Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 Serani, it depends on how the other contenders perform as well. Why r u jumping the gun, there's rank 3, then 2 and finally #1. Let England climb the ladder one step at a time.
Serani Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 That was before England became "TEAM ENGLAND" that they have now under the excellent leadership of Andy Flower, before they were a one man team of Pietersen and some crappy bowlers like Harmison and now they are "TEAM ENGLAND" with superstars everywhere and a competent bowling attack that has PACE, BOUNCE, SEAM AND SWING!, mwahahaha.
Serani Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 Serani' date=' it depends on how the other contenders perform as well. Why r u jumping the gun, there's rank 3, then 2 and finally #1. Let England climb the ladder one step at a time.[/quote'] Us English dont settle for mediocrity, we have seen the glory in our T20 win and now we want to rule the world of cricket with an iron fist, beating all the hapless teams we happen to come up against in a merciless yet Stylish manner.
kabira Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 That was before England became "TEAM ENGLAND" that they have now under the excellent leadership of Andy Flower' date=' before they were a one man team of Pietersen and some crappy bowlers like Harmison and now they are "TEAM ENGLAND" with superstars everywhere and a competent bowling attack that has PACE, BOUNCE, SEAM AND SWING!, mwahahaha.[/quote'] LOL, check their bowling attack when they played India both in England and India. I am sure you will be shocked. Anderson, Flintoff, Broad, Swann all were there.
Serani Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 LOL' date=' check their bowling attack when they played India both in England and India. I am sure you will be shocked. Anderson, Flintoff, Broad, Swann all were there.[/quote'] There was also Harmison, a loser with a losers mentality that singe handedly cost England the game, its a good job that joke is finished.
Serani Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 TEAM UNITED NATIONS will be more appropriate.. ok then TEAM ENGLAND* * represents the fact the team may not be composed of entirely english players, merely players that choose to represent england and happen to be very good.
kabira Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 ^so you are entirely blaming your loses on Harmison. Well in India we have delusional fans, but you have just surpassed everyone.
Serani Posted July 30, 2010 Posted July 30, 2010 ^so you are entirely blaming your loses on Harmison. Well in India we have delusional fans, but you have just surpassed everyone. Well the particular test match in Chennai can be attributed to Harmison, then we have the entire ashes series.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now