Rank the batsmen!

[zen]

Simple Q: How much would the top batsmen of all time average if they had access to the same coaching, training, etc .... Some of the greats may not have played to their full potential so you when you rank them you can assume their best potential Please rank the top batsmen with their perceived averages. My ranking: 1. Bradman ----> 80 2. Sobers ----> 60 3. Richard ----> 58 Others: Tendulkar, Gavaskar, Lara, Chappell, Pollock, Hutton, Hammond, Headley, Hobbs, .... ----> 56 - 52 Any yes, wishing everyone a merry christmas and happy new year! :icflove:

[ShahidAfridi]

Bradman 65 Sobers 60 Afridi 60 Sachin 55

[zen]

Bradman 65 Sobers 60 Afridi 60 Sachin 55

We are not talking about bowling averages :P

[ShahidAfridi]

We are not talking about bowling averages :P

Yes your right There is no Ishant Sharma :haha:

[Serani]

I you believe Afridi even has the talent to average 60 in tests then your a moron. Then we consider the fact he is mentally retarded.

[Sir john]

@Sereni :bow:

[Rajiv]

I you believe Afridi even has the talent to average 60 in tests then your a moron. Then we consider the fact he is mentally retarded.

Depends on how many matches he plays, coz he can play 1, score a quick 60 and then retire -- oh wait..

[Roshanrocks]

If all of them debut internationally at the age of 16 irrespective of how good they were, face the same opposition.... face serious career threatening injuries, play as much number of ODI's , T20's, play in the same team, have the same team mates, have the same practise bowlers, play for the same country, have third umpires, modern technology etc.... In tests Tendulkar 56 Sehwag 53 Bradman 52 Sobers 52 Ponting 48 Lara 48 Richards 46 I can make up any numbers i want cant i? :hmmm: And after lookin at Mohammad Ameer n Jaydev Unadkat I'd like to think not everyone can debut n click early.

[zen]

In tests Tendulkar 56 Sehwag 53 Bradman 52 Sobers 52 Ponting 48 Lara 48 Richards 46

You only put 56 for Tendulkar! .... This is so disappointing as I expected anyone with a Sachin avatar or an username like "Sachin is whatever" to put in a lot more (like the Afridi fan has Afridi avg 60) :(( And also good to see that some folks think that Richards playing at his full potential would avg only 46 and that too 10 runs behind Tendulkar, who is also playing at his full potential!

[Roshanrocks]

You only put 56 for Tendulkar! .... This is so disappointing as I expected anyone with a Sachin avatar or an username like "Sachin is whatever" to put in a lot more (like the Afridi fan has Afridi avg 60) :(( And also good to see that some folks think that Richards playing at his full potential would avg only 46 and that too 10 runs behind Tendulkar, who is also playing at his full potential!

:hysterical: I knew u wud reply to my quote

[zen]

:hysterical: I knew u wud reply to my quote

I knew folks like you (Sachin is .... brigade) would post in this thread too :P

[Roshanrocks]

I knew folks like you would post in this thread too :P

:two_thumbs_up: ur obsession with Tendulkar is just incredible

[Roshanrocks]

I knew folks like you (Sachin is .... brigade) would post in this thread too :P

oh u re-phrased ha? :woot: You see... whenever I see Rett opening a thread...I always know that I will find Tendulkar mentioned in it somewhere... other than ur photography thread of course

[zen]

:two_thumbs_up: ur obsession with Tendulkar is just incredible

I am one of the biggest Sachin fans around but that doesn't mean have to blow his trumpet at any given opportunity :giggle: PS I even posted when someone had Afridi avg 60 :P

[Roshanrocks]

I am one of the biggest Sachin fans around but that doesn't mean have to blow his trumpet at any given opportunity :giggle: PS I even posted when someone had Afridi avg 60 :P

:giggle: :P :--D