desi pride 1234 Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 world cup team has been announced . We all have our own suggestions. My only complain is sreesanth not making the cut. I failed to understand the logic behind munaf's inclusion in the team. yes he did well in the 2nd odi against sa. But his pace didn't cross 125 kmph. Sreee brings in lot of energy in the team. Chikka has always hated sreesanth for his nakras. Maybe that's y they didn't picked him.. Felt very bad for sreesanth.
Sid Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Poor decision,I also feel bad for Sree,deserved a chance
HowardRoark Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Maybe because the bowling average/economy of Munaf and Sree are 29.81/4.74 and 32.04/6.01 respectively?
saneindian Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Sree has a ER of 6+! Munna on the other hand has hard;y gone for runs in the last 8-9 matches he has played since comeback and picked up crucial wickets.
Sid Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Sree should have been picket not in place of Munna but Nehra
Sachin=GOD Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Sreesanth was not picked maybe because the selectors actually wanted this team to win the World Cup :hmmm:
b555 Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Sreesanth was not picked maybe because the selectors actually wanted this team to win the World Cup :hmmm:
Sid Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Sreesanth was not picked maybe because the selectors actually wanted this team to win the World Cup :hmmm: Then why Nehra has been picked :cantstop:
sudheer kumar Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Nice question............. But It should be Nehra in the place of Munaf Why Nehra? Why not Sreesanth? Munaf has ability of match winning performance.......which nehra don't have
Sachin=GOD Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Then why Nehra has been picked :cantstop: because while he gives away runs, he, unlike Sreesanth, also takes wickets (he has been our highest wicket taker in last 2 years).
Sid Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 because while he gives away runs' date=' he, unlike Sreesanth, also takes wickets (he has been our highest wicket taker in last 2 years).[/quote'] ok,then check the last few matches Sree has played in Odis he has also taken wickets,its not like he goes wicketless with getting hammered for 80 runs in 10 overs in every match he plays and add to that he is a much better fielder than Nehra and BTW what a LOL comment to make he goes for runs but at the same time picks up wickets,then better call Sir Aggy in the team as well he used to do the same thing
asterix Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Munna selection is good. Dhoni has more faith on Nehra than Santh. Santh should learn to not crass his path with the Boss..Hope he has learnt his lessons now..
Sachin=GOD Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 ok' date='then check the last few matches Sree has played in Odis he has also taken wickets,its not like he goes wicketless with getting hammered for 80 runs in 10 overs in every match he plays and add to that he is a much better fielder than Nehra[/quote'] last year Sreesanth's economy rate in ODIs was 7.19 and if you take figures of last two years , his economy rate is still 6.88 and this is the ODI world cup, not T20, so this high economy rate is unacceptable.
EnterTheVoid Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Sorry? Sorry for what? He is an AVERAGE bowler at best, and his on field tantrums are a distraction and more of a hindrance than help. As for the idiot who was comparing Sreesanth to Allan Donald/Glenn McGrath, pull your head out of your ****, sreesanth is not good enough to tie their shoe laces.
Sid Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 last year Sreesanth's economy rate in ODIs was 7.19 and if you take figures of last two years ' date= his economy rate is still 6.88 and this is the ODI world cup, not T20, so this high economy rate is unacceptable. But you forgot to tell us that Sree was also the 2nd highest wicket taker for India in indian conditions and legendary Nehra also had an economy rate of 6.1 in Indian conditions last year :giggle:
hari504504 Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Munaf is a good choice.. but Nehra will get hammered by one and all.. especially hate his run-up which looks like a dog with a limp running away after someone chucked a stone at it..
Sid Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Munaf is a good choice.. but Nehra will get hammered by one and all.. especially hate his run-up which looks like a dog with a limp running away after someone chucked a stone at it.. :hysterical::hysterical:
cowboysfan Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Maybe because the bowling average/economy of Munaf and Sree are 29.81/4.74 and 32.04/6.01 respectively? munna has a slightly better ER at home (4.65) which i find astonishing.
asterix Posted January 17, 2011 Posted January 17, 2011 Munaf is a good choice.. but Nehra will get hammered by one and all.. especially hate his run-up which looks like a dog with a limp running away after someone chucked a stone at it..
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now