CG Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 Yeah Yeah,We know how good aussies are at judging potential , have a look at there ONCE in a generation bowler http://www.smh.com.au/news/cricket/australian-crickets-pop-star-has-the-it-factor/2006/03/03/1141191849845.html
rkt.india Posted November 2, 2011 Author Posted November 2, 2011 Yeah Yeah' date='We know how good aussies are at judging potential , have a look at there ONCE in a generation bowler http://www.smh.com.au/news/cricket/australian-crickets-pop-star-has-the-it-factor/2006/03/03/1141191849845.html But Johnson is good, better than any Indian bowler, and the best left arm pacer right now.
vamos_rafa Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 His action looks a bit like that of Steve Harmison's when he had started out. Cummins gets a bit more side-on though. But looking at his action, a stress fracture seems inevitable.
saneindian Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 Yet to hit 90 mph. The wicket though looks to be a batting beauty, nice pace and carry.
rkt.india Posted November 16, 2011 Author Posted November 16, 2011 Yet to hit 90 mph. The wicket though looks to be a batting beauty' date=' nice pace and carry.[/quote'] Pacey wicket with some extra bounce much better than Kotla and Eden.
carnish Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 But Johnson is good' date=' better than any Indian bowler, and the best left arm pacer right now.[/quote'] tsotsobe:nono:
carnish Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 Pacey wicket with some extra bounce much better than Kotla and Eden. why do you think pace and bounce is a good wicket.... just cause indian wickets are not fast and bouncy doesnot mean ours are bad wickets... we have had slow and dusty pitches since a long time and our players cherish playing on these tracks... these should always be the better tracks for us... atleast we indians should consider our pitches as best and not follow west countries and loose our tradition.
Hur Rizvi Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 looked good in ODIs and T20 but i think as of yet he is not ready for test cricket...
Pagalpanti Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 Well its better to get him ready then, a player will always take time to adjust and be his best in test whether he's 18 or 25.
Hur Rizvi Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 Well its better to get him ready then' date=' a player will always take time to adjust and be his best in test whether he's 18 or 25.[/quote'] agree, everyone needs time to adjust at this level specially when he has only played 3 F.C matches
rkt.india Posted November 17, 2011 Author Posted November 17, 2011 Cummins really steaming in every ball now.
Bradman99 Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 looked good in ODIs and T20 but i think as of yet he is not ready for test cricket... What makes you say that? He has looked our best bowler.
rajmarie Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 Saw him in CL...& then in the SA-Aus ODI series...was really impressed. & He has bowled quite well today. Action seems easy....infact..they way he runs in...dont look like he will get that much speed. Liking him bowling...& IMO..will cause trouble to our batsman down under if they play him.
vamos_rafa Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 Saw him in CL...& then in the SA-Aus ODI series...was really impressed. & He has bowled quite well today. Action seems easy....infact..they way he runs in...dont look like he will get that much speed. Liking him bowling...& IMO..will cause trouble to our batsman down under if they play him. Yes there attack suddenly seems a bit more potent. We never know which MJ might turn up against us, Cummins seems to be a very bright prospect and Siddle is one very dependable bowler.
Bradman99 Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 I'd be surprised if Johnson is still in the side when we play India. With Harris to come back and Cummins bowling better than Johnson, he may just make way unless he steps up very quickly.
Raghav_12 Posted November 18, 2011 Posted November 18, 2011 IIRC, Mitchell Johnson has always troubled Indians, specially right handers with that awkward angle. I would rather like not to face him, however crap he has become.
rkt.india Posted November 18, 2011 Author Posted November 18, 2011 I'd be surprised if Johnson is still in the side when we play India. With Harris to come back and Cummins bowling better than Johnson' date=' he may just make way unless he steps up very quickly.[/quote'] Harris is very fragile and I do not see him surviving much. IMO, I am more impressed from James Pattinson rather than Cummins in terms of bowling action and the ability to move the ball which Cummins lacks as his seam position is not the balanced, tilting to one side. Cummins, Pattinson, Siddle, and Mitchell Starc/James Faulkner/Kane Williamson. This is future attack for Australia.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now