Jump to content

Should minnows be allowed to play in the 50 over world cup


Guest prince

Recommended Posts

Posted

2015 world cup format should be: 2 groups of five super six semi finals best of three finals ICC are right in increasing t20 world cup to 16 tournaments.

Posted

1. Lets not be arrogant. Smaller teams need to be promoted on the bigger stage. 2. Smaller teams have achieved a lot in world cups in the past. Kenya made it to the semis. Ireland defeated Pakistan. There is every possibility of an upset and that adds to the world cup excitement. 3. The game itself needs to spread. The more we allow these teams exposure on a big stage, the more likely they are to do well in future. Dont forget how Lanka transformed in 1996. Dont forget how India herself was a minnow and what magic 1983 WC success to us. If ICC had stuck to the policy no minnows in WC, India and Lanka would never have won a world cup. So, lets not be selfish and lets allow others have the opportunity we ourselves got in the past. They have a right to it.

Posted
1. Lets not be arrogant. Smaller teams need to be promoted on the bigger stage. 2. Smaller teams have achieved a lot in world cups in the past. Kenya made it to the semis. Ireland defeated Pakistan. There is every possibility of an upset and that adds to the world cup excitement. 3. The game itself needs to spread. The more we allow these teams exposure on a big stage, the more likely they are to do well in future. Dont forget how Lanka transformed in 1996. Dont forget how India herself was a minnow and what magic 1983 WC success to us. If ICC had stuck to the policy no minnows in WC, India and Lanka would never have won a world cup. So, lets not be selfish and lets allow others have the opportunity we ourselves got in the past. They have a right to it.
Good post.
Posted
1. Lets not be arrogant. Smaller teams need to be promoted on the bigger stage. 2. Smaller teams have achieved a lot in world cups in the past. Kenya made it to the semis. Ireland defeated Pakistan. There is every possibility of an upset and that adds to the world cup excitement. 3. The game itself needs to spread. The more we allow these teams exposure on a big stage, the more likely they are to do well in future. Dont forget how Lanka transformed in 1996. Dont forget how India herself was a minnow and what magic 1983 WC success to us. If ICC had stuck to the policy no minnows in WC, India and Lanka would never have won a world cup. So, lets not be selfish and lets allow others have the opportunity we ourselves got in the past. They have a right to it.
Is this a serious post?
Posted
1. Lets not be arrogant. Smaller teams need to be promoted on the bigger stage. 2. Smaller teams have achieved a lot in world cups in the past. Kenya made it to the semis. Ireland defeated Pakistan. There is every possibility of an upset and that adds to the world cup excitement. 3. The game itself needs to spread. The more we allow these teams exposure on a big stage, the more likely they are to do well in future. Dont forget how Lanka transformed in 1996. Dont forget how India herself was a minnow and what magic 1983 WC success to us. If ICC had stuck to the policy no minnows in WC, India and Lanka would never have won a world cup. So, lets not be selfish and lets allow others have the opportunity we ourselves got in the past. They have a right to it.
yes, thats why i'm saying that ICC are right in increasing number of t20 teams, t20 is rising around the world and it will be easier for the minnows to adapt to t20 format than 50 over format.
Posted
Only as serious as the possibility of a Kenya making it to the semis or Ireland beating Pakistan.
I was more referring to categorizing India and Sri Lanka as minnows. Personally, I feel 12 teams should constitute the World Cup, which would give the top 2-3 associate nations a chance to compete with the best, and leave the possibility open for the odd upset. 14 or 16 teams is too many and dilutes the quality of cricket you expect in a premier tournament.
Posted
ICC should have the minnows play the bigger teams at least once every year otherwise these minnows will never progress.
LOL! And who is going to watch this annual crapfest? In a cricketing era when players are struggling with injuries and overload you want to burn out the players even more?
Posted
LOL! And who is going to watch this annual crapfest? In a cricketing era when players are struggling with injuries and overload you want to burn out the players even more?
so how are these minnows going to become better?? Surely not by playing amongst each other? If they are only going to play against the best teams once every 4 years (and now even that is going to be scrapped from 2015 WC) they are always going to struggle at the bigger stage.
Posted
I was more referring to categorizing India and Sri Lanka as minnows. Personally, I feel 12 teams should constitute the World Cup, which would give the top 2-3 associate nations a chance to compete with the best, and leave the possibility open for the odd upset. 14 or 16 teams is too many and dilutes the quality of cricket you expect in a premier tournament.
Well, India and Lanka were not minnows, but certainly were underdogs and were never expected to win too many matches. I agree with the second part of your post. The number of weak teams can be limited.
Posted
ICC should have the minnows play the bigger teams at least once every year otherwise these minnows will never progress.
LOL! And who is going to watch this annual crapfest? In a cricketing era when players are struggling with injuries and overload you want to burn out the players even more?
S=G is right. The best would be to include the weaker teams in ODIs that usually follow a bilateral test series. So if India goes to play tests in SA and are playing a few ODIs after that, they should be made to invite one of the weaker teams and make it a triangular tournament. A few bucks will be lost, but it will do the game a lot of good. If Kenya had gotten enough exposure after that WC, they could have improved a lot. There was no encouragement whatsoever for their success. The players did not have a sponsor even for the basic kits. Giants like BCCI can pay for their kits, boards can pool some money to make sure the players have shoes and bats to play with. It's peanuts for most boards. But we know that the boards wont do it unless ICC makes them do it. IF we want this game to grow and spread, ICC will have grow a pair and take a few steps.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...