rkk101 Posted February 26, 2011 Posted February 26, 2011 Are the Pax genuine contenders to win the WC or that the Lankans arent as good as percieved by some ?
veer Posted February 26, 2011 Posted February 26, 2011 too many moving factors.. pak is too inconsistent just like lanaka.. plus, the venus is too dependent on toss.. i would say there are four geniune contendeer... India, SA, Ozzie and paks..
Sir_Afridi Posted February 26, 2011 Posted February 26, 2011 India is too batting dependent. If their batting fails in any knock out game, they are gone.Pak & Aus have bowling attack to make up for batting failure in knock out games.
Sid Posted February 26, 2011 Posted February 26, 2011 India is too batting dependent. If their batting fails in any knock out game' date=' they are gone.Pak & Aus have bowling attack to make up for batting failure in knock out games.[/quote'] Ya we saw that bowling attack,lol lost only by 11 runs :hysterical:
zen Posted February 26, 2011 Posted February 26, 2011 India is too batting dependent. If their batting fails in any knock out game' date=' they are gone.[b']Pak & Aus have bowling attack to make up for batting failure in knock out games. Ok, so if Pak had collapsed for 230-240, it would still have won despite bowling under lights, right? Despite the batting clicking and bowling under lights, Pak could well have lost this game, if SL had 2 good overs, no?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now