Mariyam Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 I have never watched a boxing game in my life, so beats me. Football is 90 minutes, players are running all the time, passing the ball around, having shots at the posts, excellent skills, bootiful ladkiyas in the stadium, sometimes pissed off hooligans compare this to cricket 9 hours of play for 5 consecutive days and you get a draw? Which draw seems more acceptable? Also, in cricket you see a lot of nonathletic people, no need to name them, football players looks to be more in shape compared to cricketers. I wouldn't say cricket is a lazy sport, but more effort is required in football. Wars are fought for years, people shooting all the time, throwing grenades, having shots at border outposts, bootiful ladkiyas ( actresses) visiting the front lines to encourage the soldiers, some times pissed off citizens compare this to 90 minutes of football and in the end the war ends in a draw/ status quo. Which draw seems more acceptable? Some wars last for years after years and no one wins. I guess war is lazy too. :P
Baad Indian Posted March 9, 2011 Author Posted March 9, 2011 I have never watched a boxing game in my life, so beats me. Football is 90 minutes, players are running all the time, passing the ball around, having shots at the posts, excellent skills, bootiful ladkiyas in the stadium, sometimes pissed off hooligans compare this to cricket 9 hours of play for 5 consecutive days and you get a draw? Which draw seems more acceptable? Also, in cricket you see a lot of nonathletic people, no need to name them, football players looks to be more in shape compared to cricketers. I wouldn't say cricket is a lazy sport, but more effort is required in football. But if you look around the world , cricket skills are more difficult to master as compared to football .
Mariyam Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 But if you look around the world ' date=' cricket skills are more difficult to master as compared to football .[/quote'] Exactly, look at the Dutch and the Brazilians. They've mastered football skills so easily, but have not been able to master cricket. Hell, the Dutch couldn't even defend 190 odd runs today.
Late Cut Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 But if you look around the world ' date=' cricket skills are more difficult to master as compared to football .[/quote'] Not true at all- there are many factors that come into play including aptitude, talent, coaching...each sport is difficult for it's own reasons.
Late Cut Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Exactly, look at the Dutch and the Brazilians. They've mastered football skills so easily, but have not been able to master cricket. Hell, the Dutch couldn't even defend 190 odd runs today. Whatchu sayin about Brazilians? :orderorder:
Mariyam Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Whatchu sayin about Brazilians? :orderorder: To ensure that you would respond :P
The Outsider Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Boxing isn't even a sport - it's just a remnant of mankind's barbaric past and will die out as civilization evolves more.
Late Cut Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Boxing isn't even a sport - it's just a remnant of mankind's barbaric past and will die out as civilization evolves more. Barbaric past...hehehe...best of luck with that one! :haha:
Watson87 Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Wars are fought for years, people shooting all the time, throwing grenades, having shots at border outposts, bootiful ladkiyas ( actresses) visiting the front lines to encourage the soldiers, some times pissed off citizens compare this to 90 minutes of football and in the end the war ends in a draw/ status quo. Which draw seems more acceptable? Some wars last for years after years and no one wins. I guess war is lazy too. :P I don't like bloodshed, I am against war. Peace brother :winky2: how is war a sport? :nervous:
The Outsider Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Barbaric past...hehehe...best of luck with that one! :haha: What's the 'sport' bit in trying to outdo each other in inflicting pain?
Watson87 Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Exactly, look at the Dutch and the Brazilians. They've mastered football skills so easily, but have not been able to master cricket. Hell, the Dutch couldn't even defend 190 odd runs today. Same can be said about India, Dutch can't defend 190 lmao? Can you imagine how many goals Netherlans and Brazil would have scored agaisnt India:hysterical::hysterical:?
Mariyam Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Boxing isn't even a sport - it's just a remnant of mankind's barbaric past and will die out as civilization evolves more. Boxing maybe barbaric, but barbarism is lazy. Don't forget that. I don't like bloodshed' date=' I am against war. Peace [b']brother :winky2: how is war a sport? :nervous: Very difficult for me to be your brother, :((
Watson87 Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Boxing isn't even a sport - it's just a remnant of mankind's barbaric past and will die out as civilization evolves more. Word. Boxing is a show for women and guys who enjoy half sweaty naked men
Mariyam Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Boxing isn't even a sport - it's just a remnant of mankind's barbaric past and will die out as civilization evolves more. On a serious note, why do you say that Boxing will die out as civilization evolves more? Did track field events die out when man invented cars? Did swimming die out when ocean liners were invented? Did shot put die out when cranes were invented? On the same lines, no reason why boxing ( and I'm no supporter) should die out.
Late Cut Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 What's the 'sport' bit in trying to outdo each other in inflicting pain? Combat is part of who we are and human nature, as is pain and suffering (would be completely OT- and i won't get on the soapbox about the impermenence of things and clinging here). When you fight in a ring, it is about competing, and competing with honor and respect. No matter what people might say or trash talk, there is nothing like sparring or fighting someone in the ring to bring out the true nature of anyone. And at the end of any fight, no matter what the result ( i am talking about sports not war etc.) you will have respect for the person you fought, and a better understanding of yourself...plus you learn how to wear make up! :haha:
Mariyam Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Same can be said about India' date=' Dutch can't defend 190 lmao? Can you imagine how many goals Netherlans and Brazil would have scored agaisnt India:hysterical::hysterical:?[/quote'] I don't know about all that, but if India scored 190 goals, they would be able to defend their lead. That proves Baad Indian's theory that cricket is a tougher game to master than football.
Late Cut Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Well, Ronaldo's head is bigger than that of any cricketer, hence footballers are smarter, hence football is the more difficult and non lazy sport.
Watson87 Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 I don't know about all that, but if India scored 190 goals, they would be able to defend their lead. That proves Baad Indian's theory that cricket is a tougher game to master than football. Don't think football goes that way, behenji. :giggle: 190 goals, India would be lucky to score one goal :hysterical:
Sachin=GOD Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 I don't know about all that' date=' [b']but if India scored 190 goals, they would be able to defend their lead. That proves Baad Indian's theory that cricket is a tougher game to master than football. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: 1 run in cricket in NOT equal to 1 goal in football :winky:
Baad Indian Posted March 9, 2011 Author Posted March 9, 2011 And I believe that if Whites give there everything to cricket then they can absolutely dominate the game thanks to there strong built and athletic abilities . Notice the difference between the standard of fielding of Asian teams and Australia/NZ/South Africa . Even the Dutch and Irish are superior to the Asian teams in fielding department . These part time cricketers from Europe show better performance in the field compared to Lazy Asians.
Recommended Posts