asterix Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 I couldn't find the AMITDANCE smiley..I wanted to use it on this topic.. Desi Paaji, our favorite smiley is gone..:((
akshayxyz Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 As I mentioned in another post, It was not a normal game, it was a WORLD CUP KNOCK OUT MATCH!! Every player is too focused to win n not to be thinking like mentioned in that factor, even subconsciously. Anyways, Sachin unfortunately couldn't score the TON here. And it doesn't work like '50% complacency or awe of the innings or crowd pressure for a half-century'... And when Ponting scores a Ton, Australia's win %age should go up (I am too lazy to check out his career stat), he obviously doesn't have the aura of Sachin!! The Aussies couldn't do it in this match though. :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:
DomainK Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 Surely my last post on this topic. 1. In International cricket, one has got to be mentally n physically tuned to give his 110% all the time. If Sachin's Tons affect the performance of rest of the players by even 5% on average, then that is a big enough factor and will convert a good number of potential victories into lossesties especially since all the bigger teams are so evenly matched these days, which I believe is precisely whats happening. 2. I have taken the last ~11.5 yr period of Sachin for reference in which he has 20 Tons. I believe its a big enough duration and number of TONS to be showing normal results. If you are to compare with others, then compare in a greater or at least an equally long period, with the batsmen having 10+ tons during that period. As I mentioned in another post, It was not a normal game, it was a WORLD CUP KNOCK OUT MATCH!! Every player is too focused to win n not to be thinking like mentioned in that factor, even subconsciously. Anyways, Sachin unfortunately couldn't score the TON here. And it doesn't work like '50% complacency or awe of the innings or crowd pressure for a half-century'... And when Ponting scores a Ton, Australia's win %age should go up (I am too lazy to check out his career stat), he obviously doesn't have the aura of Sachin!! The Aussies couldn't do it in this match though. :facepalm: Gone are the days we could rely on a man's word.
Sachin=GOD Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 As I mentioned in another post, It was not a normal game, it was a WORLD CUP KNOCK OUT MATCH!! Every player is too focused to win n not to be thinking like mentioned in that factor, even subconsciously. Anyways, Sachin unfortunately couldn't score the TON here. And it doesn't work like '50% complacency or awe of the innings or crowd pressure for a half-century'... And when Ponting scores a Ton, Australia's win %age should go up (I am too lazy to check out his career stat), he obviously doesn't have the aura of Sachin!! The Aussies couldn't do it in this match though. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: the lamest excuse I've ever seen for anything!!
punjabi_khota Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 This thread goes more retarded and the explanation more bullcrap with each passing match.
ganeshran Posted March 25, 2011 Author Posted March 25, 2011 Microsoft's profits doubled after Vaibhav left the company :hehe:
akshayxyz Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 Vaibhav - did you ever have any contact with any paki/lahori, or went too close to the border? you might have communicated a deadly disease - lahori logic - symptoms are all over the place.
King Tendulkar Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 talk about digging a hole bigger and bigger. This is getting retarted
Gunner_Mania Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 No wonder everyone compares Ponting with Tendulkar...His century yesterday resulted in a loss for his team! I'vent read any posts in this thread, but I thought I would contribute my 2p with the above FB status from somebody:P
vaibhav_delhi Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 Since year 2000: Sehwag: 11 wins in 12 Tons (not counting the no-ball six on 99) Sachin: 11 wins in 20 Tons I believe other team members let Sachin's Ton affect their own performances as explained in earlier posts. While only some (or none) of you guys think there could be any specific factor for why we lose so much more when Sachin scores a Ton than when Sehwag scores a Ton. I think that should be a fair assessment to end the discussion.
The Outsider Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 As I mentioned in another post, It was not a normal game, it was a WORLD CUP KNOCK OUT MATCH!! Every player is too focused to win n not to be thinking like mentioned in that factor, even subconsciously. Anyways, Sachin unfortunately couldn't score the TON here. And it doesn't work like '50% complacency or awe of the innings or crowd pressure for a half-century'... And when Ponting scores a Ton, Australia's win %age should go up (I am too lazy to check out his career stat), he obviously doesn't have the aura of Sachin!! The Aussies couldn't do it in this match though. vaibhav, a word of advice - don't let your seniors or managers at work know that you post on ICF.
The Outsider Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 Since year 2000: Sehwag: 11 wins in 12 Tons (not counting the no-ball six on 99) Sachin: 11 wins in 20 Tons I believe other team members let Sachin's Ton affect their own performances as explained in earlier posts. While only some (or none) of you guys think there could be any specific factor for why we lose so much more when Sachin scores a Ton than when Sehwag scores a Ton. I think that should be a fair assessment to end of discussion. http://indiancricketfans.com/showpost.php?p=1381594&postcount=400 If Sehwag is only going to hit hundreds against the crappier teams quite obviously he'll have that kind of record.
Sachin=GOD Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 vaibhav' date=' a word of advice - don't let your seniors or managers at work know that you post on ICF.[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
vaibhav_delhi Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 vaibhav' date=' a word of advice - don't let your seniors or managers at work know that you post on ICF.[/quote'] but some of them agree with me.:D
Raghav_12 Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 http://indiancricketfans.com/showpost.php?p=1381594&postcount=400 If Sehwag is only going to hit hundreds against the crappier teams quite obviously he'll have that kind of record. Outy.. No point in giving reason to vaibhav_delhi...He's commited himself too much for his cause and will not accept anything now even if he wants to..
vaibhav_delhi Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 http://indiancricketfans.com/showpost.php?p=1381594&postcount=400 If Sehwag is only going to hit hundreds against the crappier teams quite obviously he'll have that kind of record. Not that big a point. As we have seen, win %age when sachin plays and when he doesn't play is almost the same. Ideally when the best batsman in the world scores a ton, the team should win more than 55%, because the team is not that incapable.
Sachin=GOD Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 Not that big a point. As we have seen, win %age when sachin plays and when he doesn't play is almost the same. Ideally when the best batsman in the world scores a ton, the team should win more than 55%, because the team is not that incapable. that is ONLY for the period you have chosen to take the stats from - i.e. since 2000, what about the many, many 100s before 2000 that you have conveniently excluded because, in your words, people like to see "recent" stats.
akshayxyz Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 but some of them agree with me.:D You may very well post the IQ,CAT scores & MSFT certificates of all of them. Would be a good case to study.
ganeshran Posted March 25, 2011 Author Posted March 25, 2011 After I came to know vaibhav wrote code for Windows 7 , I switched to Linux :phehehe: j/k. I was always on Linux
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now