Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 a dropped chance does not in anyway take credit from ross and sachin.....it only shows pakistan can't field. ON THE OTHER HAND, the most dubious win in a wc GOES to pakistan 1992 when they were bowled out for 74 against england and escaped defeat due to RAIN ONLY.they would not have quailified for the semis if not for THAT POINT. proves conclusively that pakistan's only WC is the most dubious and undeserved :--D Not against a world beating side,against ageing stars like botham and lamb. and hence its highly very unfa.r also the botham dismissal was dubious and hence one of of his wickets shud be minussed. At their peak, lamb and botham would handed out a thrashing to pakistan as they did in 1987 in australia. The world beating australian side beating pakistan in their sleep from 2000 onwards and against them he would not have shone.this is proved by the 1999 final. its not that it required australia for "choking" http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64508.html In this match, the NZ tailender Gavin larsen took 14 runs(atleast scored bulk of them) in the final over out of you know who to fashion a impossible win ! proves conclusively which team has the most famous chokers! dude ifs and buts r for losers.. watever happened then was also part of the game and is incorporated by icc rules.. dont forget we crashed out in 2003 also because of the game against zimbabwe being washed out so then fair enough count it too.. and those "aging" stars like lamb and botham etc in watever form they were atleast they were good enough to surpass ur team at that time.. and obviously good enough to bring their team to semi.. where was ur "youthful" tendulkar then..? choking..?:P so no matter how u see it.. pak won fair and square.. and if u really want to question then question ur team's competence in failing to stop us.. and dude go check the records once again, this time with open eyes.. pak beat aus in 2002 odi series.. now check and tell me how many tournaments sachin won u involving aus..? just 1 in the post wc99 period..:haha:
satyam1729 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 dont forget we crashed out in 2003 also because of the game against zimbabwe being washed out so then fair enough count it too.. Are you sure you are not lying ? :haha::haha: You lost to OZ, IND and England.
Switchblade Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Computer Angel even in that game against Zims you guys needed a massive win if Zims had made anything you needed to win in 20 overs your teams N.R.R was poor
Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Are you sure you are not lying ? :haha::haha: You lost to OZ, IND and England. nope.. as far as i remember we had a chance beating zimbabwe by a big margin..
satyam1729 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 and dude go check the records once again, this time with open eyes.. pak beat aus in 2002 odi series.. now check and tell me how many tournaments sachin won u involving aus..? just 1 in the post wc99 period..:haha: CT 2002, CB SERIES 2008. :hysterical::haha: So it is 2.
satyam1729 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 nope.. as far as i remember we had a chance beating zimbabwe by a big margin..[/quote Have you checked the scorecard of that match. You would have lost that match. Fact is Pak 1992 team was the most undeserving champion. :haha:
Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Computer Angel even in that game against Zims you guys needed a massive win if Zims had made anything you needed to win in 20 overs your teams N.R.R was poor exactly.. given the circumstances then it was not quite difficult as pak was easily the best bowling side of the tournament and zimbabwe was even crappier..
satyam1729 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 exactly.. given the circumstances then it was not quite difficult as pak was easily the best bowling side of the tournament and zimbabwe was even crappier.. Pak best bowling side yet lost to OZ, IND and ENG. :hysterical::hysterical:
Deleted_User_1 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 lol how u ppl fail to remember that sachin was dropped on 8 by razzaq.. so it really was a blessing from razzaq otherwise without a lucky break he's as good as wc 2003 final in the most of important matches.. :haha: Blessing from Razzaq? Get the **** out of here, man!! It is not Sachin's fault that his catch (a tough one) was dropped.
Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 dude there can never be such thing as "undeserving champion".. now uve started to ridicule ur ownself..
Switchblade Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 No C.A their chances were very less to qualify if they made anything they needed to dismiss Zims for 70 or 75
satyam1729 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 So didn't rain save you from being out ? And rest all the WC champions never relied on rain.
Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Blessing from Razzaq? Get the **** out of here' date=' man!! It is not Sachin's fault that his catch (a tough one) was dropped.[/quote'] and neither was it waseem's.. get the point..? in case if u dont waseem owed sachin then..:haha:
The Outsider Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 nope.. as far as i remember we had a chance beating zimbabwe by a big margin.. Weren't Pakistan 3 down in 10 overs with best player of phaassht bowling out in single digits?
satyam1729 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 and neither was it waseem's.. get the point..? in case if u dont waseem owed sachin then..:haha: Wasim owned Sachin by dismissing him only 3 times in 26 matches. :giggle::hysterical::haha: You are giving all demonstration of your pakiness.
Switchblade Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Yes Inzamams total in that world cup was magnificient 16
Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 No C.A their chances were very less to qualify if they made anything they needed to dismiss Zims for 70 or 75 so..? a tough chance doesnt mean uve lost it before u get a shot on it.. we'v seen more tougher ones than this.. if u think rain favoured us in 92 then admit that it also washed us out in 03..
Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 No C.A their chances were very less to qualify if they made anything they needed to dismiss Zims for 70 or 75 so..? a tough chance doesnt mean uve lost it before u get a shot on it.. we'v seen more tougher ones than this.. if u think rain favoured us in 92 then admit that it also washed us out in 03.. fair enough..
satyam1729 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 so..? a tough chance doesnt mean uve lost it before u get a shot on it.. we'v seen more tougher ones than this.. if u think rain favoured us in 92 then admit that it also washed us out in 03.. Rain saved you from ZIM in 2003 WC . I admit it. You would have lost that match.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now