gult Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 Joginder sharma's finals record is 100%. Dump zaheer and get Jogi in.
SachDan Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 The way "I' date=' the great M$ coder (NOT QA tester :hitler:) " see it is that failure of Sehwag at top is due to presence of SRT on the other end.(This [s']dog SRT, is a mere mortal btw :finger:). It affects Sehwag by 6.5%, and hence he is not able to score many runs. And then Sehwag leaves early, SRT gets nervous (the midget choker he is) and is unable to score hundreds of his own. This induction effect (SRT affects Sehwag affects SRT) is then passed on to the rest of team, with each member affected by (6.5-x)%, where x is 6.5 for Dhoni and 0 for all others. Since the data is based on 15 finals, it is statistically significant enough for me to make my genius observations. You stupid ****tards would be thinking, what logic is that. Well, I have news for you retards. If you challenge my logic, I would NOT take my pants off and show my right ass cheek where I got Bill Gates' autograph...now you don't want me to do that, do you ? :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
asterix Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 The way "I' date=' the great M$ coder (NOT QA tester :hitler:) " see it is that failure of Sehwag at top is due to presence of SRT on the other end.(This [s']dog SRT, is a mere mortal btw :finger:). It affects Sehwag by 6.5%, and hence he is not able to score many runs. And then Sehwag leaves early, SRT gets nervous (the midget choker he is) and is unable to score hundreds of his own. This induction effect (SRT affects Sehwag affects SRT) is then passed on to the rest of team, with each member affected by (6.5-x)%, where x is 6.5 for Dhoni and 0 for all others. Since the data is based on 15 finals, it is statistically significant enough for me to make my genius observations. You stupid ****tards would be thinking, what logic is that. Well, I have news for you retards. If you challenge my logic, I would NOT take my pants off and show my right ass cheek where I got Bill Gates' autograph...now you don't want me to do that, do you ? :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Epic..
Sid Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 The way "I' date=' the great M$ coder (NOT QA tester :hitler:) " see it is that failure of Sehwag at top is due to presence of SRT on the other end.(This [s']dog SRT, is a mere mortal btw :finger:). It affects Sehwag by 6.5%, and hence he is not able to score many runs. And then Sehwag leaves early, SRT gets nervous (the midget choker he is) and is unable to score hundreds of his own. This induction effect (SRT affects Sehwag affects SRT) is then passed on to the rest of team, with each member affected by (6.5-x)%, where x is 6.5 for Dhoni and 0 for all others. Since the data is based on 15 finals, it is statistically significant enough for me to make my genius observations. You stupid ****tards would be thinking, what logic is that. Well, I have news for you retards. If you challenge my logic, I would NOT take my pants off and show my right ass cheek where I got Bill Gates' autograph...now you don't want me to do that, do you ? :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::cantstop:
Karan114 Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 The way "I' date=' the great M$ coder (NOT QA tester :hitler:) " see it is that failure of Sehwag at top is due to presence of SRT on the other end.(This [s']dog SRT, is a mere mortal btw :finger:). It affects Sehwag by 6.5%, and hence he is not able to score many runs. And then Sehwag leaves early, SRT gets nervous (the midget choker he is) and is unable to score hundreds of his own. This induction effect (SRT affects Sehwag affects SRT) is then passed on to the rest of team, with each member affected by (6.5-x)%, where x is 6.5 for Dhoni and 0 for all others. Since the data is based on 15 finals, it is statistically significant enough for me to make my genius observations. You stupid ****tards would be thinking, what logic is that. Well, I have news for you retards. If you challenge my logic, I would NOT take my pants off and show my right ass cheek where I got Bill Gates' autograph...now you don't want me to do that, do you ? :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
ganeshran Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 The way "I' date=' the great M$ coder (NOT QA tester :hitler:) " see it is that failure of Sehwag at top is due to presence of SRT on the other end.(This [s']dog SRT, is a mere mortal btw :finger:). It affects Sehwag by 6.5%, and hence he is not able to score many runs. And then Sehwag leaves early, SRT gets nervous (the midget choker he is) and is unable to score hundreds of his own. This induction effect (SRT affects Sehwag affects SRT) is then passed on to the rest of team, with each member affected by (6.5-x)%, where x is 6.5 for Dhoni and 0 for all others. Since the data is based on 15 finals, it is statistically significant enough for me to make my genius observations. You stupid ****tards would be thinking, what logic is that. Well, I have news for you retards. If you challenge my logic, I would NOT take my pants off and show my right ass cheek where I got Bill Gates' autograph...now you don't want me to do that, do you ? :hail: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Sachin=GOD Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 The way "I' date=' the great M$ coder (NOT QA tester :hitler:) " see it is that failure of Sehwag at top is due to presence of SRT on the other end.(This [s']dog SRT, is a mere mortal btw :finger:). It affects Sehwag by 6.5%, and hence he is not able to score many runs. And then Sehwag leaves early, SRT gets nervous (the midget choker he is) and is unable to score hundreds of his own. This induction effect (SRT affects Sehwag affects SRT) is then passed on to the rest of team, with each member affected by (6.5-x)%, where x is 6.5 for Dhoni and 0 for all others. Since the data is based on 15 finals, it is statistically significant enough for me to make my genius observations. You stupid ****tards would be thinking, what logic is that. Well, I have news for you retards. If you challenge my logic, I would NOT take my pants off and show my right ass cheek where I got Bill Gates' autograph...now you don't want me to do that, do you ? :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Sachinism Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 If tendulkar plays we lose If Sehwag plays we lose Might as well recruit some gully cricketers
jpkonline Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 if we go by superstitions then sachin should not score more than 99 sewag should not play in finals should also remove kohli so far he has failed in crunch situations dhoni should divorce his wife as she has been unlucky for his batting:hitler:
vaibhav_delhi Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 Sehwag: 11 wins in 12 Tons (not counting the no-ball six on 99) Sachin: 11 wins in 20 Tons since 2000. suck on it mofos :finger: The team needs to be made aware about the reason otherwise the stat only gets consolidated with time. Now close this thread or else I will have to paste my CAT scorecard for you dumbos. :finger: :P
saneindian Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 Sehwag: 11 wins in 12 Tons (not counting the no-ball six on 99) Sachin: 11 wins in 20 Tons since 2000. suck on it mofos :finger: The team needs to be made aware about the reason otherwise the stat only gets consolidated with time. Now close this thread or else I will have to paste my CAT scorecard for you dumbos. :finger: :P Bhaijaan Sehwag 1 win out of 14-15 finals wo bhi way back in 2002. Hatana to banta hai boss :--D On a serious note, there are reports that Sehwag is still not fully fit and that he may have to pass a fitness test on the morning of the QF.
vaibhav_delhi Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 Bhaijaan Sehwag 1 win out of 14-15 finals wo bhi way back in 2002. Hatana to banta hai boss :--D On a serious note, there are reports that Sehwag is still not fully fit and that he may have to pass a fitness test on the morning of the QF. never suggested to drop sachin bro. I proposed the factors n the way they could be re-mediated. And we need fully fit veeru fr the quarters:nervous:
akshayxyz Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 Sehwag: 11 wins in 12 Tons (not counting the no-ball six on 99) Sachin: 11 wins in 20 Tons since 2000. suck on it mofos :finger: The team needs to be made aware about the reason otherwise the stat only gets consolidated with time. Now close this thread or else I will have to paste my CAT scorecard for you dumbos. :finger: :P Not sufficient, you have to post the score cards of everyone around you in that room. The guy in front of you might have affected your score by 8.76% and the on the the left and right might have affected by 7.54% and 4.89% respectively - depending upon whether your right eye is dominant or left one.
akshayxyz Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 The way "I' date=' the great M$ coder (NOT QA tester :hitler:) " see it is that failure of Sehwag at top is due to presence of SRT on the other end.(This [s']dog SRT, is a mere mortal btw :finger:). It affects Sehwag by 6.5%, and hence he is not able to score many runs. And then Sehwag leaves early, SRT gets nervous (the midget choker he is) and is unable to score hundreds of his own. This induction effect (SRT affects Sehwag affects SRT) is then passed on to the rest of team, with each member affected by (6.5-x)%, where x is 6.5 for Dhoni and 0 for all others. Since the data is based on 15 finals, it is statistically significant enough for me to make my genius observations. You stupid ****tards would be thinking, what logic is that. Well, I have news for you retards. If you challenge my logic, I would NOT take my pants off and show my right ass cheek where I got Bill Gates' autograph...now you don't want me to do that, do you ? :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Sachin=GOD Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 Sehwag: 11 wins in 12 Tons (not counting the no-ball six on 99) Sachin: 11 wins in 20 Tons since 2000. So Goddy's career started in 2000 :hmmmm2: that is the only reason I can think of as to why you are so adamant on ONLY taking the runs/100s from 2000 onwards (or 2006 - depending upon which suits your argument on different occasions :hehe:) suck on it mofos :finger: The team needs to be made aware about the reason otherwise the stat only gets consolidated with time. Now close this thread or else I will have to paste my CAT scorecard for you dumbos. :finger: :P :fear: :fear: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Raghav_12 Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 The way "I' date=' the great M$ coder (NOT QA tester :hitler:) " see it is that failure of Sehwag at top is due to presence of SRT on the other end.(This [s']dog SRT, is a mere mortal btw :finger:). It affects Sehwag by 6.5%, and hence he is not able to score many runs. And then Sehwag leaves early, SRT gets nervous (the midget choker he is) and is unable to score hundreds of his own. This induction effect (SRT affects Sehwag affects SRT) is then passed on to the rest of team, with each member affected by (6.5-x)%, where x is 6.5 for Dhoni and 0 for all others. Since the data is based on 15 finals, it is statistically significant enough for me to make my genius observations. You stupid ****tards would be thinking, what logic is that. Well, I have news for you retards. If you challenge my logic, I would NOT take my pants off and show my right ass cheek where I got Bill Gates' autograph...now you don't want me to do that, do you ? Massive Pwnage.:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Raghav_12 Posted March 22, 2011 Posted March 22, 2011 Sehwag: 11 wins in 12 Tons (not counting the no-ball six on 99) Sachin: 11 wins in 20 Tons since 2000. suck on it mofos :finger: The team needs to be made aware about the reason otherwise the stat only gets consolidated with time. Now close this thread or else I will have to paste my CAT scorecard for you dumbos. :finger: :P Oh dude.. first you boasted the fact that you work for Microsoft and now this CAT scorecard. But I don't think that people here would be impressed for anything less than Nobel prize. Now don't tell me that you are Nobel Laureate as well.. In btw, if you so desperate, you can post your CAT score as well..
Cricket Tragic Posted March 22, 2011 Author Posted March 22, 2011 The way "I' date=' the great M$ coder (NOT QA tester :hitler:) " see it is that failure of Sehwag at top is due to presence of SRT on the other end.(This [s']dog SRT, is a mere mortal btw :finger:). It affects Sehwag by 6.5%, and hence he is not able to score many runs. And then Sehwag leaves early, SRT gets nervous (the midget choker he is) and is unable to score hundreds of his own. This induction effect (SRT affects Sehwag affects SRT) is then passed on to the rest of team, with each member affected by (6.5-x)%, where x is 6.5 for Dhoni and 0 for all others. Since the data is based on 15 finals, it is statistically significant enough for me to make my genius observations. You stupid ****tards would be thinking, what logic is that. Well, I have news for you retards. If you challenge my logic, I would NOT take my pants off and show my right ass cheek where I got Bill Gates' autograph...now you don't want me to do that, do you ? :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now