Cricket Tragic Posted April 5, 2011 Posted April 5, 2011 True' date=' although even on debut Dravid made 95 in England ([b']not a great attack but alien conditions). I don't disagree with your assessment of Pujara, let's hope he converts his promise into performances in the coming series. You're right. It didn't matter in those days. Any attack overseas was tough. Look at the scores in this match. :cantstop: [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssLVAZ7IIcE]YouTube - Sachin Tendulkar - 122 vs. England (1996)[/ame]
vvvslaxman Posted April 5, 2011 Author Posted April 5, 2011 Selection procedure needs tinkering. THey should find new methods. Every team in the world pick the performers from the first class. I think we have to pick bunch of top players and get everyone together and provide some kind of setup where they can showcase their skills. What kind of a set up. I don't know. But they can try something like that.
kabira Posted April 5, 2011 Posted April 5, 2011 temperament and guts play huge role when we go abroad. Gambhir proved in last test match. That was one of his best gutsy knocks. We need characters like that who are willing to tough it out. Virat, Pujara, Raina, Rahane etc have the recipe and talent, but can they succeed consistently we will only know when we play them. And do not expect them to start scoring runs from first game. Remember it took a while for Laxman to be seasoned pro. Not everyone is Sachin or Dravid.
BeautifulGame Posted April 5, 2011 Posted April 5, 2011 :facepalm: He is a cross-batted slogger. He will never be a successful test player. I'm ready to bet anything on it. I agree with the other three names. I think you are judging him based on IPL.He has done wonderfully well for karnataka this season and Karnataka are one of the few teams that play on green wickets all their home matches. He also stood out in Duleep trophy and scored a double century for south zone if i am not mistaken
vvvslaxman Posted April 5, 2011 Author Posted April 5, 2011 This Murali vijay is extremely comfortable against any attack on certain pitches. But once the pitch is a little quick he just pokes and prods against balls that go outside the off stump something our 1980s batsmen loved to do.
youngindia Posted April 5, 2011 Posted April 5, 2011 Manish pandey is no slogger, plays proper cricketing shots and strikes it very well. but the report of the A team tour was not positive on his game against the quicks and i already noticed his backfoot game needs huge lift. let's see what happens this season.
youngindia Posted April 5, 2011 Posted April 5, 2011 This Murali vijay is extremely comfortable against any attack on certain pitches. But once the pitch is a little quick he just pokes and prods against balls that go outside the off stump something our 1980s batsmen loved to do. steyn's outswingers too good for him this time. steyn bowled him with an inswinger in nagpur.so he was trying to set vijay up with the surprise ball coming in again. that could be the reason for his hesitation in leaving.
expoking Posted April 6, 2011 Posted April 6, 2011 Dominating world cricket This is something i have been thinking about for a while, but it seems most appropriate now just as we've become World Champs. Would dominating world cricket be a good thing, I mean the answer seems obvious on paper but couldn't you say winning continuously becomes boring, doesn't it become less sweet with every victory, isn't it better to win as underdogs rather than as firm favorites. Remember during Australia's era of domination when the crowds would not even cheer for an innings victory for their own side, they would rather watch a closely fought game. As it is i don't think India are anywhere near domination yet, aging batting lineup in tests and no great bowling prospects which is essential for domination. But the question still stands, would you like to see India dominate?
Chandan Posted April 7, 2011 Posted April 7, 2011 This is something i have been thinking about for a while, but it seems most appropriate now just as we've become World Champs. Would dominating world cricket be a good thing, I mean the answer seems obvious on paper but couldn't you say winning continuously becomes boring, doesn't it become less sweet with every victory, isn't it better to win as underdogs rather than as firm favorites. Remember during Australia's era of domination when the crowds would not even cheer for an innings victory for their own side, they would rather watch a closely fought game. As it is i don't think India are anywhere near domination yet, aging batting lineup in tests and no great bowling prospects which is essential for domination. But the question still stands, would you like to see India dominate? Of course we'd like to see India dominate and are we not hearing about the aging batting line up since last 5 years and impotent bowling line up since infinity? Even then we are number one in tests since last 16 months and have won the world cup now. Of course the BCCI is the biggest challege that our team faces because of the ridiculous schedules that it finalises for us. This is the biggest hurdle which I'm afraid might defeat us.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now