Asim Posted May 10, 2011 Posted May 10, 2011 Here is the web-site where Mr. Asim pulled out his story from, and most importantly -- look at the spin Mr. Asim (apparently a more respected member waving the Green Flag on this forum) has put on the story. http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/01/military-drone-afghan-success-rate-uav Let me highlight some points here. Now why he might have said the 2%. What does Mr. Asim do -- put a completely different spin on the whole story -- and write it in BIG BOLD letters that 98% killed are innocent civilians. Despicably shameless -- representation of facts by Asim. These guys I will tell you. OK Mamu! please put your stats of terrorists vs civilian casualties by drone attacks in Pakistan...
cricket_usa Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 According to OBL and the other terrorist collateral damage was alright cause those people were close to the intended target and anyone's death is in the hands of allah. So all the collateral damage are worth it to get rid of terrorist hiding in Pakistan. May be allah is guiding the US drones to take the people away cause all the death is in the hands of allah.
The Outsider Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 According to OBL and the other terrorist collateral damage was alright cause those people were close to the intended target and anyone's death is in the hands of allah. So all the collateral damage are worth it to get rid of terrorist hiding in Pakistan. May be allah is guiding the US drones to take the people away cause all the death is in the hands of allah. Bin Laden and other terrorists are your moral compass? :hysterical:
cricket_usa Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 If these so called innocent civilians harbor these terrorist and these so called warriors want to hide behind skirts, collateral damage is acceptable. Unfortunately OBL is the face of Islam in western countries and they may not be a moral compass for me by they are for millions of Muslims.
Recommended Posts