What a match.!

[Sidhoni]

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/62423.html what a match, no four, no six, nothing..! out of 4 innings, only one crossed 100, rest of the time, the teams were bowled out below 100..! :yikes:

[THX_1138]

not necessarily no boundaries. they just do not have a complete record.

[THX_1138]

if you notice, the explicit statement "0 4s" is only against scores under 4 for whom scoring a boundary would be an obvious contradiction.

[f.b.m]

Yeah thats how its done for some club teams in games where keeping accurate stats isnt that important. Also, in b4 Lurker's nostalgia trips about how the 12th century was the golden age for cricket.

[Sidhoni]

if you notice' date=' the explicit statement "0 4s" is only against scores under 4 for whom scoring a boundary would be an obvious contradiction.[/quote'] yeah, you are right,buddy.i noticed that too now after u said that, but whats the point in telling that there are 0 4s scored by the batsmen who have not even reached a total of 4.:giggle:

[Sidhoni]

Hey one more thing, its a match in which an over consisted of 4 balls..!! :yikes: i have heard that for the first time since it was an international match.

[Roshanrocks]

LOHMANN The greatest bowler in cricketing history with an average of 10.75 The DON Bradman of bowlers

[urbestfriend]

yeah' date=' you are right,buddy.i noticed that too now after u said that, but whats the point in telling that there are 0 4s scored by the batsmen who have not even reached a total of 4.:giggle:[/quote'] Since the 4's and 6's records are not maintained, software is making the best case assumption that there are no fours if batsmen haven't scored more than 4. Since six list shows all zeros, I wonder whether there was sixes at that time :dontknow: EDIT: I viewed other matches in the same series, six list is always zero which means there were no sixes. When is sixes introduced to cricket?

[Sidhoni]

Since the 4's and 6's records are not maintained, software is making the best case assumption that there are no fours if batsmen haven't scored more than 4. Since six list shows all zeros, I wonder whether there was sixes at that time :dontknow: EDIT: I viewed other matches in the same series, six list is always zero which means there were no sixes. When is sixes introduced to cricket?

ok, i dont know abt the sixes, but at the time of this series, evn 6-ball overs were not introduced, there were 4-ball overs..! :hmmm:

[White716]

What a wonderful match. You share nice information i don't know these thing before this post.

[hatja_tau]

what? Ferris and Turner bowled unchanged for 47 overs!!!:two_thumbs_up:

[Sidhoni]

What a wonderful match. You share nice information i don't know these thing before this post.

thx :icflove:

[veer]

video or it didnt happen.... :)

[jairamesh]

1888!, hell that is like 2 millenniums ago

[Sidhoni]

video or it didnt happen.... :)

i have already given the scorecard link :dontknow:

[Sidhoni]

1888!' date=' hell that is like 2 millenniums ago[/quote'] was just the 28th test match in the history of international cricket :giggle:

[Spiderguy252]

Perhaps that was considered as high totals back in the day, who knows.

[Sidhoni]

what? Ferris and Turner bowled unchanged for 47 overs!!!:two_thumbs_up:

47 4-ball overs!! :poink:

[Sachinism]

video or it didnt happen.... :)

:haha:

i have already given the scorecard link :dontknow:

:blink: