Iconoclast Posted August 10, 2011 Author Posted August 10, 2011 49 wickets in 13 tests, average and strike rate don't count :winky: Bhaji took 49 wickets in 13 tests at an average of 37. Ajmal took 27 wickets in 5 tests at an average of 25 (match winning stats IMHO) And just for fun Hafeez took 10 wickets at an average of 25 also :giggle:
Midfielder Posted August 11, 2011 Posted August 11, 2011 Bhaji took 49 wickets in 13 tests at an average of 37. Ajmal took 27 wickets in 5 tests at an average of 25 (match winning stats IMHO) And just for fun Hafeez took 10 wickets at an average of 25 also :giggle: These guys are new, please give them more time to be exposed. But comparing these guys to Harbhajan is travesty.
Midfielder Posted August 11, 2011 Posted August 11, 2011 Well said :icflove: There were so many insane hate posts by wrist slitters here about Bhajji's bowling in the first two tests..as if he was solely responsible for team India's loss :headshake: Now the lynch mob is after pace bowlers & batsmen after realizing that it's not Bhajji's fault wonly ( madrasi touch :winky: ) but our top batsmen and meduim pacers failed as well. I, unlike many of you wrist slitters here...don't disrespect any Indian cricketer with name calling & what not...just take it easy :two_thumbs_up: So true. The hate for Bhajji was totally startling. I am surprised they are not blaming him already.
GrassHoppers Posted August 11, 2011 Posted August 11, 2011 Dartbajan's the reason our team's in this situation this tour, time for Sir Yusuf 'Viv' Pathan to replace the pie chucker at No.8
ensd2 Posted August 11, 2011 Posted August 11, 2011 Emerging batsman of the year , his future in cricket relies on his batting
Watson87 Posted August 11, 2011 Posted August 11, 2011 He bowled pretty well against South Africa, just had two bad games against the Angrej and you guys are making fun of him. :finger: yall
div Posted August 11, 2011 Posted August 11, 2011 Shows that quality of cricket has really gone down in last few years. He is one of the most successful Indian cricketers. What do u mean by quality of cricket? Match fixing,Ball tampering,Biased umpiring etc?
Stuge Posted August 11, 2011 Posted August 11, 2011 He is one of the most successful Indian cricketer. What do u mean by quality of cricket? Match fixing,Ball tampering,Biased umpiring etc? Yes ,he was a very good bowler,but now he isn't .
tapish Posted August 12, 2011 Posted August 12, 2011 Watson, Cook, Trott, Kallis, De Villiers, Steyn etc. are all deserving. but Bhaj seriously? This has to be a joke. Bhaj has bowled poorly in the last 12 months. Apart from the bowling performance in Durban, he hasn't done anything nothing to get his nomination for the best Cricketer. If you say he got 2 hundreds on Flat tracks against mediocre bowling attack on New Zealand, even Broad has done better than him on a consistent basis with both bat and ball.
asterix Posted August 12, 2011 Posted August 12, 2011 ^ ROFLMAO.. Top class job.. :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical: :hysterical:
SachDan Posted August 12, 2011 Posted August 12, 2011 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now