Jump to content

Fastest Over Ever Bowled?


CG

Recommended Posts

Posted

IS this the fastest over ever? or joking? Brett Lee's speel in New Zealand and ain WC 2003 against SL were reall fast spells. Jeff Thompson's spell against boycott was real fast.

Posted
IS this the fastest over ever? or joking? Brett Lee's speel in New Zealand and ain WC 2003 against SL were reall fast spells. Jeff Thompson's spell against boycott was real fast.
People say this is the fastest over ever bowled and holding fastest ever but look like a medium pacer from the footage to me.
Posted
People say this is the fastest over ever bowled and holding fastest ever but look like a medium pacer from the footage to me.
Then they don't know what is fast. This over does not look fast enough to be called fastest. Holding's spell to Brian Close looked faster than this.
Posted

What a beauty Shoaib was at his fastest ! A sight to behold. Just notice his runup. He runs faster than some of the average athletes sprints. Atleast I might not be as fast when I sprint. And thats saying a lot when you are running to bowl a delievery ! Although I do not think this was Shoaib's fastest. I am sure I have seen him bowl faster. I still relish the balls he got Sachin and Dravid out . However, the other thing one can notice is his action does look quite suspect . As for Holding, doesnt look all that fast to me. Perhaps the camera work also got to do a little to it.

Posted
What a beauty Shoaib was at his fastest ! A sight to behold. Just notice his runup. He runs faster than some of the average athletes sprints. Atleast I might not be as fast when I sprint. And thats saying a lot when you are running to bowl a delievery ! Although I do not think this was Shoaib's fastest. I am sure I have seen him bowl faster. I still relish the balls he got Sachin and Dravid out . However, the other thing one can notice is his action does look quite suspect . As for Holding, doesnt look all that fast to me. Perhaps the camera work also got to do a little to it.
yUP NOT HIS FASTEST BUT REALLY A SIGHT TO BEHOLD............
Posted

The video angle doesnt really tell the full picture(just 3 balls in the video). I read a ball by ball description of this over by Scyld Berry in the 1980s. As the following links show, about four of the deliveries had Boycott at a loss how to escape damage to wicket or body - one of them I remember narrowly missed his throat, another rapped his knuckles, another smacked into his thighs, the last one ripped out the stump. And this is Boycott the supreme technician who has countered Lillee/Thomson/Garth Le Roux/Pascoe/Imran/Hadlee/West Indians and many more speedsters in the 70 http://stevelitchfield.com/holding/other.html http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/144327.html And it was the first over of a test match, no looseners from Holding. Dont be misled by the looks of it, Kim Hughes said in his autobiography that the Aussies told him that Holding's steps were so noiseless and action so graceful that batsmen had little to offer when all the sudden the ball sprang at them from out of his hand. Yup Akhtar is faster statistically but Holding was a pretty deadly bowler who was miles ahead of the Paki when it came to plotting dismissals.

Posted

I do not actually go by word of mouth. Not even if it involves experts. My logic - I have noticed far too many of these experts calling calling some bowler fast just because of his reputation. So many times I saw Donald bowling in the 130's and all I would hear is - wow, he is fast ! Only once , in 99 WC when Srinath was bowling and the caption read ' Right arm fast medium' did Graeme Pollock say - Wow, I have seen Srinath bowling and he is much much faster that just a fast medium bowler. So, what I am trying to say is its more about impression than the real stuff.

Posted

The proof of the pudding is in the eating - it doesnt matter to me if a bowler is 115 or 150mph as long as he makes the batsman fumble or keeps smacking him all over the body - thats obviously the psychological blow that expedites a wicket. In that Akhtar clip, Ponting survived that over and wasnt dismissed after another 81 runs were added. Ponting 197, Akhtar 1-74 off 16 overs.

Posted
The proof of the pudding is in the eating - it doesnt matter to me if a bowler is 115 or 150mph as long as he makes the batsman fumble or keeps smacking him all over the body - thats obviously the psychological blow that expedites a wicket. In that Akhtar clip, Ponting survived that over and wasnt dismissed after another 81 runs were added. Ponting 197, Akhtar 1-74 off 16 overs.
There are always 2 sides of the coin. Here you he is Ponting, one of the best batsmen ever especially against fast bowling, batting and looking clueless several times and then there was England, look at who batsmen are playing, very immaturish.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...