ganeshran Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 Nasir Hossain outt... 5 required off 3 balls
ganeshran Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 New batsman will be on strike.. keeper had taken the catch
ganeshran Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 miscue shot ... single taken 4 required off 2 balls.
ganeshran Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 Rahim hits a 66666666666666666 Bangros win Sir John :hehe:
Crookbond Posted October 11, 2011 Posted October 11, 2011 Ravi Rampaul's last overs are close to Ramsay brothers films : horror.
Cricket Tragic Posted October 13, 2011 Posted October 13, 2011 Bangbros :facepalm: Into the 40th over and they haven't yet taken a wicket. Great to see Simmons converting finally.
Cricket Tragic Posted October 13, 2011 Posted October 13, 2011 It should be. They've been a bit slow considering the fact that they haven't lost a wicket yet.
ganeshran Posted October 13, 2011 Posted October 13, 2011 Bangbros :facepalm: Into the 40th over and they haven't yet taken a wicket. Great to see Simmons converting finally. Spoken too soon :giggle:
WC2011INDIA Posted October 13, 2011 Posted October 13, 2011 Spoken too soon :giggle: Simmons has done his job. Now, the other WI batsmen have to slog and get to 280+ Samuels gone....gonna be hard now.
Cricket Tragic Posted October 13, 2011 Posted October 13, 2011 Damn. I was hoping that WI would play all the overs without losing a wicket. Highly unlikely to happen but that would have been epic.
WC2011INDIA Posted October 13, 2011 Posted October 13, 2011 Damn. I was hoping that WI would play all the overs without losing a wicket. Highly unlikely to happen but that would have been epic. Won't be surprised if all of them get out while slogging
Cricket Tragic Posted October 13, 2011 Posted October 13, 2011 Dire effort from Bangbros. They didn't make any real effort the chase down the total at all once again. It looked like they had set themselves a target of 250. :headshake:
Number Posted October 13, 2011 Posted October 13, 2011 They needed 80 runs from 40 balls at a time with 6 wickets in hand , should've tried harder than this.
.svg.png.5ab3ce86b8af4a762132502c85a350db.thumb.png.8a4574a4556391f1df10aa68196a2ab0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now