200+ match aggregate in wins

[vvvslaxman]

Number of times the following batsmen have a match aggregate of 200 when their team wins. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;orderby=player;page=4;qualmin1=200;qualval1=runs;result=1;template=results;type=batting;view=match Bradman 12 RT Ponting 10 Whingakkara 7 Greenidge 6 Kallis 6 Langer 6 Dravid 5 Inzamam 5 Hammond 5 Atapattu 4 G CHappell 4 Miandad 4 Younis 4 Sehwag 3 Boycott 3 Hayden 3 Hutton 3 Moyo 3 Pietersen 3 G Smith 3 Sobers 3 SR Waugh 3

[Khalpat]

I didnt get it why 200, is it a kind of benchmark, the better way is how many time team have won when players have made century R Ponting 29 Don Bradman 25 M Hayden 25 Sachin 20 Inzi 18 A gilchrist 15 R Dravid 15 I Bell 11 B Lara 8 W Hammond 7 VVS Laxman 7 S Gavaskar 6

[vvvslaxman]

I didnt get it why 200, is it a kind of benchmark, the better way is how many time team have won when players have made century R Ponting 29 Don Bradman 25 M Hayden 25 Sachin 20 Inzi 18 A gilchrist 15 R Dravid 15 I Bell 11 W Hammond 7 S Gavaskar 6

Reason is when you score a 100.. there is a good chance someone else also got a 100 like in Headingley.. Tendulkar made 193.. but Dravid's 148 was much more significant. But in 200 aggregate scenario.. it is very rare two batsmen have aggregate of 200 in the same match.

[Khalpat]

Reason is when you score a 100.. there is a good chance someone else also got a 100 like in Headingley.. Tendulkar made 193.. but Dravid's 148 was much more significant. But in 200 aggregate scenario.. it is very rare two batsmen have aggregate of 200 in the same match.

Yah but again why 200 because its 5 times India has won when Sachin has scored more than 180 in a match then how is greater than 200 more significant then 180. And also its only Win Matches what about Drawn test. Many great batsman such as Lara, Sachin, Gavaskar do not come into picture and their significance we will never understand in saving a match.

[vvvslaxman]

Yah but again why 200 because its 5 times India has won when Sachin has scored more than 180 in a match then how is greater than 200 more significant then 180. And also its only Win Matches what about Drawn test. Many great batsman such as Lara, Sachin, Gavaskar do not come into picture and their significance we will never understand in saving a match.

Just because they didn't make this list they don't become any lesser players. If it makes you happy Sachin is also in this list. You are free to post the stat with a cut off 179 also as India won a match with Sachin scoring 179. ..If we go further down.. you can use 165 as cut off.. India won couple of matches with sachin scoring.. we can go down to 155 few more wins. twice 214* & 54 in the most recent test against Australia 248* vs Bangladesh.

[vvvslaxman]

with 180 cut off Bradman 14 Punter 13 Langer 9 Greenidge 8 Kallis 8 Guru Greg 7 Inzamam 7 Dravid 6 Gooch 6 Boycott 5 Hammond 5 Hayden 5 Moyo 5

[Khalpat]

Just because they didn't make this list they don't become any lesser players. If it makes you happy Sachin is also in this list. You are free to post the stat with a cut off 179 also as India won a match with Sachin scoring 179. ..If we go further down.. you can use 165 as cut off.. India won couple of matches with sachin scoring.. we can go down to 155 few more wins. twice 214* & 54 in the most recent test against Australia 248* vs Bangladesh.

Exactly that is why I asked the significance of this statistics. Please do not get me wrong, but I am still not able to understand what you are trying to say or is it just a random statistics and you found it interesting and wanted to share it with everyone. And yes I forgot using Sachin word is taboo here I just used him as an example, I am going to edit my post with Sunny or Lara or Azhar or else a whole brigade is going to come and paint me as deshdrohi bhakth murtipujak burhau upasak illogical moron.

[vvvslaxman]

This is the failure of statistics. Statistics dont show the greatness of certain knocks or players. THey can quantify numbers but can they qualify them? How valuable was Laxman's 96 in Durban compared to Jayawardene's many 200+ knocks in flat roads in SL? Stats wont tell you. Stats only confirm the greatness once quality is already evaluated.

I dont see Mahela in that list. Anyway if we start using such filters.. there are many will go missing. For instance i am using the same headingley test as an example. First dday pitch was very difficult to bat on. Second day pitch somewhat eased out. That ill be a massive exercise. Road or not if the match had resulted in a win, it would still have been considered as a signifnicant contribution.

[vvvslaxman]

Man of the match award can be combined with this.. not sure how i can do it Among batsmen who won MOM S Waugh 14 MOM out of 86 wins Punter 11/106 Hayden 8/71 Langer 8/70 Sangu 8/43 G Chappell 7/38 Dravid 7/56 Inzamam 7/49 Gilly 6/73 Gooch 6/32 Thorpe 6/38 Azhar 5/22 Pietersen 5/34 Sehwag 5/37 Hussey 5/43 Slater 5/44 laxman 5/47 Greenidge 5/57 Tendulkar 5/63

[Raghav_12]

Man of the match award can be combined with this.. not sure how i can do it Among batsmen who won MOM S Waugh 14 MOM out of 86 wins Punter 11/106 Hayden 8/71 Langer 8/70 Sangu 8/43 G Chappell 7/38 Dravid 7/56 Inzamam 7/49 Gilly 6/73 Gooch 6/32 Thorpe 6/38 Azhar 5/22 Pietersen 5/34 Sehwag 5/37 Hussey 5/43 Slater 5/44 laxman 5/47 Greenidge 5/57 Tendulkar 5/63

Are you gonna put all possible lists where Sachin fail to find a top place? Don't worry you'll always be able to find few such lists. When talk is about 1st innings average then he'll be compared with sehwag, when about fourth innings average then he'll be compared with VVS. Few years back it was fashinable to compare his fourth innings averages with other greats particularly with Lara, Dravid or Waugh. Now as Sachin closed that gap or surpassed many of these greats, that stat has gone out of fashion. How many matrix we are going to invent just to put Sachin down, RPT, no of match total of 200 in wins (while declaring that 100s are meaningless)? I am pretty sure you not gonna run out of ideas ever.

[vvvslaxman]

Are you gonna put all possible lists where Sachin fail to find a top place? Don't worry you'll always be able to find few such lists. When talk is about 1st innings average then he'll be compared with sehwag, when about fourth innings average then he'll be compared with VVS. Few years back it was fashinable to compare his fourth innings averages with other greats particularly with Lara, Dravid or Waugh. Now as Sachin closed that gap or surpassed many of these greats, that stat has gone out of fashion. How many matrix we are going to invent just to put Sachin down, RPT, no of match total of 200 in wins (while declaring that 100s are meaningless)? I am pretty sure you not gonna run out of ideas ever.

I am not putting down anybody. I don't need stats to say the weaknesses of Sachin. Strengths of Sachin. It is mainly a Tribute to Dravid than to disrespect to Tendulkar.

[Stuge]

Are you gonna put all possible lists where Sachin fail to find a top place? Don't worry you'll always be able to find few such lists. When talk is about 1st innings average then he'll be compared with sehwag, when about fourth innings average then he'll be compared with VVS.

how is this stat anti tendulkar ? why you need to look it at that way .:facepalm:

[cameron_black]

lmao the extents people will go to somehow include sachin in a list :hysterical:

[Crookbond]

how is this stat anti tendulkar ? why you need to look it at that way .:facepalm:

Exactly, how I thought about it. Beauty lies in the eyes of the beer holder.

[Khalpat]

I am not putting down anybody. I don't need stats to say the weaknesses of Sachin. Strengths of Sachin. It is mainly a Tribute to Dravid than to disrespect to Tendulkar.

Arey beta jis school main padhte ho na us school keh hum principle reh chuke hain. The school in which you are studying I was once the principle of that school. There can be hundreds of stats to show the greatness of Dravid, there can be hundreds of criteria in which this great man will be at top position, why do you need to open a thread of a rediculous statistics in which Dravid to whom you want to pay ribute is at 7th position.

[akshayxyz]

Arey beta jis school main padhte ho na us school keh hum principle reh chuke hain. The school in which you are studying I was once the principle of that school. There can be hundreds of stats to show the greatness of Dravid' date=' there can be hundreds of criteria in which this great man will be at top position, [b']why do you need to open a thread of a rediculous statistics in which Dravid to whom you want to pay ribute is at 7th position.

:hysterical: Also, sharing that position with Inzamam the great.

[Raghav_12]

Arey beta jis school main padhte ho na us school keh hum principle reh chuke hain. The school in which you are studying I was once the principle of that school. There can be hundreds of stats to show the greatness of Dravid' date=' there can be hundreds of criteria in which this great man will be at top position, why do you need to open a thread of a rediculous statistics in which Dravid to whom you want to pay ribute is at 7th position.[/quote'] haha.. This was kind of disguised tribute where people could not figure out that it was a tribute until tributer declared himself. @akhsayxyz - Not only he shares that space with Inzi, he is behind his contemporaries like Whinga and Langer.

[vvvslaxman]

Arey beta jis school main padhte ho na us school keh hum principle reh chuke hain. The school in which you are studying I was once the principle of that school. There can be hundreds of stats to show the greatness of Dravid' date=' there can be hundreds of criteria in which this great man will be at top position, why do you need to open a thread of a rediculous statistics in which Dravid to whom you want to pay ribute is at 7th position.[/quote'] He is no.1 Indian ..

[vvvslaxman]

haha.. This was kind of disguised tribute where people could not figure out that it was a tribute until tributer declared himself. @akhsayxyz - Not only he shares that space with Inzi, he is behind his contemporaries like Whinga and Langer.

He is still the no.1 Indian..

[akshayxyz]

haha.. This was kind of disguised tribute where people could not figure out that it was a tribute until tributer declared himself. @akhsayxyz - Not only he shares that space with Inzi, he is behind his contemporaries like Whinga and Langer.

I don't care whether it was tribute or to bring down anyone specific. But 'khalpat' pwned him on this one - that it was a tribute to Dravid. Least vvs should have done was, filtered the list to include only Indians. :hysterical:.