akshayxyz Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 I guess even Afridi. Isn't it? I read somewhere, he created a new milestones for his likes - 100th international 10 (or less).
India-KXIP fan Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 How many great bastmen can achieve 100 tons? All of these Ponting, Lara, Kallis, Younis, Inzi, Dravid, Pieterson, Cook and many others can match Tendulkar feat if they play as many games as sachin. None of them including Tendulkar can come close to Bradman average even if they keep on playing for ever. So which feat is greater? I rest my case ^saw username stopped reading
Ultimate_Game Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 How many great bastmen can achieve 100 tons? All of these Ponting, Lara, Kallis, Younis, Inzi, Dravid, Pieterson, Cook and many others can match Tendulkar feat if they play as many games as sachin. None of them including Tendulkar can come close to Bradman average even if they keep on playing for ever. So which feat is greater? I rest my case Well there's a huge difference in "can do" and "has done". I can very well claim that Rohit Sharma "can" average 99 provided blah blah blah... Scoring 100 intl 100s is not just about playing for a long time, it also means performing over that extended period of time across all formats. If anyone can do that why hasn't anyone done it already or why nobody's even close to doing so. We have seen likes of Ponting, Lara, Dravid, Kallis etc. play for a long time but they are not anywhere near the landmark. 100 intl 100s mean you score 5 100s a year over a 20 year career span :omg: And you know what, scoring 5 100s in a year is a very ood year for a batsman. That means someone will need to be at his peak for 20 years or thereabouts to get anywhere near SRT's 100 intl 100s. That being said, as I mentioned in my earlier post Bradman's average of 99.94 is no laughing matter eithe and I expect that average will be unbeatable as well provided a batsman plays for some time at intl level.
Ultimate_Game Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 What about Hobbs 200 FC centuries? Amazing feat IMO. But I thought he got 197 actually :winky:
pensionplan Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Amazing feat IMO. But I thought he got 197 actually :winky:And by the way Tendulkar has 78 FC centuries almost 120 FC centuries lesser than Hobbs.
Crookbond Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Amazing feat IMO. But I thought he got 197 actually :winky: Amazing feat until you see the videos, no? :D
akshayxyz Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 What about Hobbs 200 FC centuries? he choked at 199. :finger:
akshayxyz Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Amazing feat IMO. But I thought he got 197 actually :winky: truely amazing. 61 international matches, overall 800+ FC matches.
mhr123 Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Brian Lara- " whoever I have spoken to who have seen very old players in action, they believe that he (Bradman) would not have averaged 99 in today's cricket." :hysterical: barely holds the bat properly in this vid lol wth is lara !!!.. does his analysis carries any weight in front our super duber @N@Lyst team in ICF...
Ultimate_Game Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 truely amazing. 61 international matches' date=' overall 800+ FC matches.[/quote'] No doubt! To score that many runs so consistently for so long deserves high praise. Truly a great of the game :hatsoff:
King Tendulkar Posted March 20, 2012 Author Posted March 20, 2012 How many great bastmen can achieve 100 tons? All of these Ponting, Lara, Kallis, Younis, Inzi, Dravid, Pieterson, Cook and many others can match Tendulkar feat if they play as many games as sachin. None of them including Tendulkar can come close to Bradman average even if they keep on playing for ever. So which feat is greater? I rest my case How did you sneak their names in to such a conversation:hysterical:
Mandrake Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 How did you sneak their names in to such a conversation:hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical:
Dravid_TheWall Posted March 20, 2012 Posted March 20, 2012 Only cause the dwarf has been playing since 16. Lara is a better player, ability wise both are on a par with Lara touch ahead but crucial bit is Lara is not mentally weak. Comparing him with Don, all I can say is :cantstop:
rkt.india Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 How many great bastmen can achieve 100 tons? All of these Ponting, Lara, Kallis, Younis, Inzi, Dravid, Pieterson, Cook and many others can match Tendulkar feat if they play as many games as sachin. None of them including Tendulkar can come close to Bradman average even if they keep on playing for ever. So which feat is greater? I rest my case Inzi has 35 100s in 498 matches test + ODIs. He takes about 14 matches for a 100. While Tendulkar has 100 centuries in 651 matches, 6.5 matches per 100. Inzmam cannot catch him up even in his dreams.
skindia Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 Inzi has 35 100s in 498 matches test + ODIs. He takes about 14 matches for a 100. While Tendulkar has 100 centuries in 651 matches' date=' 6.5 matches per 100. Inzmam cannot catch him up even in his dreams.[/quote'] Test matches having 2 innings..so its wrong stats
Sachinism Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 Only cause the dwarf has been playing since 16. Lara is a better player' date=' ability wise both are on a par with Lara touch ahead but crucial bit is Lara is not mentally weak. Comparing him with Don, all I can say is :cantstop:[/quote'] The guy who thinks Sreesanth is the best bowler around, has the audacity to mock others :hysterical: That ape-looking 'tard wouldn't even make the drinks guy in our club side
Sachin=GOD Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 The guy who thinks Sreesanth is the best bowler around' date=' has the audacity to mock others :hysterical:[/quote'] :hysterical:
Jersey #10 Posted March 21, 2012 Posted March 21, 2012 How did you sneak their names in to such a conversation:hysterical: :haha::haha::hysterical::hysterical:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now